B
It’s not an attack!. It’s a realization that the Catholic Church has serious problems liturgically and spiritually. And that these are the problems that effect the very identity of what it is to be Roman Catholic, and the traditions we inherited from the Holy Saints and Church Fathers are being neglected by events like this. By those who have power in the Church.Did you, or people that share your same avenue of attack, ever stop and think that attitudes like this drive people away from traditionalism?
I am very much interested in learning about traditional Catholic practices, and to attend a TLM, but it’s people like you that keep me away.
I don’t mean to be insulting, but if this is the kind of elitism and sarcasm I can expect to see, I want no part of it.
Granted, the irregularities at Cardinal Mahoney’s conference are serious. That doesn’t set aside the legitimacy of the “accusation.” The OP makes fun of the term “instilled with Christ!” as it regards the Conference (not all of which may be irregular). This implies that HE or SHE knows what it means to be “instilled with Christ,” an arrogant attitude frequently exhibited by so-called “traditionalists.” So it was a perfectly cogent observation on the part of the second poster.I’ll politely ignore the previous accusation and ask why on earth are liturgical “dancers” required in Anaheim California? and why are they flocked around the altar??
that’s because they have no answer. they love the Church in their hearts, as they should!, and on some level they recoil at the ridiculousness of what they see, but can’t bring themselves–out of loyalty?-- to admit that there are sad deficiencies around them.In every thread on these boards, the argument is always reduced to the character of the traditionalist.
!
No, I’m suggesting that it not be employed in the mocking of others and that to do so immediately begs the question “so what do YOU know about it?” and begets a reaction probably opposite to that hoped for or anticipated by the person making the observation.In every thread on these boards, the argument is always reduced to the character of the traditionalist.
What are you suggesting? That it’s impossible to know what it means to be instilled with Christ? If that’s the case, the phrase is meaningless. Of course one can know what it means to be instilled with Christ!
I don’t have it in front of me, but the law of the Church is that at the bare minimum, the sacred vessels are supposed to be guilded on the surface that touches the Most Sacred Species.Okay, I give up. Can someone show me in the GIRM the use of baskets and Kool-Aid pitchers on the altar?![]()
Don’t generalize, my friend, many of us have questioned priests at the doors of our parishes after Sunday Mass while they were greeting parishoners as to the irregularities they witnessed. The existance of irregularities doesn’t excuse arrogance on the part of those witnessing said irregularities.that’s because they have no answer. they love the Church in their hearts, as they should!, and on some level they recoil at the ridiculousness of what they see, but can’t bring themselves–out of loyalty?-- to admit that there are sad deficiencies around them.
Easier to make an attack rather than deal with the disappointments.
There is no danger that it will become the standard, because it is at odds with obedience. The reform of the reform, ie, the continued organic development and evolution of the liturgy may well NOT look precisely like the TLM. I doubt either “camp” will be completely satisfied.It is the expression like this of the Roman Catholic Mass that will destroy the very identity of Roman Catholicism. What Pope Benedict XVI is trying to prevent. If this becomes the standard by which our youth identify Catholicism with than the rich traditions of Roman Catholicism, like the TLM, the, Gregorian Chant, the arts, etc…, will never be carried forward.
As I said, I very much doubt this is the standard, though I will have to say that most of the times that I’ve noticed irregularities at Mass, they have taken place on my vaction…which is always on the California coast. Last weekend, I went to San Buenaventure Mission in Ventura, CA, in the Archdiocese of LA. The Most Precious Blood was consecrated in a glass chalice. Sad, in the place founded by Fr. Lausin for the salvation of souls and the spread of the Gospel.Well, well, what a circus. That slide-show brought back a lot of nightmarish memories from the late '60 and early '70s. The Kool-Air pitchers & baskets (of what?) in particular were a hoot. Reminded me of the big bottles of Coke and bags of chips I mentioned in another thread a while back. (And there are those in this forum who didn’t believe such things ever existed.)
All I can say is thank the Good Lord I don’t have to deal with it.
And it doesn’t take an terribly high IQ nor does one have to spend a great deal of time on this forum to detect arrogance and pomposity on the part of some so-called “traditionalists.”
Hmmm…Don’t generalize…
However, when the intergrity of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is attacked, then, we cannot sit idly by and have our heads in the sand and say nothing.It is certainly sad to see that we can go so quickly on the attack against fellow Catholics who appear to be expressing their faith to the world.
Just because it may be different than the way some might express theirs doesn’t make it “bad”.
Father forgive us for those times we grieve you in wounding your Body.