If I understand Donahue’s criticism, it is not the L.A. Times which is responsible but the columnist who writes for it. I suppose you can hold the Times responsible for not muzzling George Skelton, but this would be a secondary fault rather than a primary one.
The Sacramento Bee apparently wrote an editorial criticizing Cardinal Mahony for speaking out, and the Scripps News Service is distributing it. The piece is milder than Skelton’s column but still says Mahony went beyond acceptable standards.
scrippsnews.com/node/20938
The Bee’s editorial may actually be the worse of the two, because Skelton is so obviously overboard. He speaks to persons already in his camp. But the Bee speaks to those in the middle, the ones who are less committed in their opinions. These are the people who, when polled, say they are against physician assisted-suicide but if the question is worded differently, say they are for allowing terminally ill patients to receive life-ending medication.
Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez may be the highest profile Catholic to support the assisted-suicide bill (AB 374), but he isn’t the only one. The bill’s co-author, Patty Berg, who identified herself as a practicing Catholic, (at least she did in 2005), said that issue is “just like Roe v. Wade, it’s just like abortion. If you support choice at the beginning of life, you can’t reconcile not supporting choice at the end."
calcatholic.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?id=ba29bff6-a838-4171-84d0-ab34da454a24
I think we need to thank Cardinal Mahony, and also San Francisco’s Archbishop George Niederauer for speaking out againt this measure.