B
Bluegoat
Guest
OK, so this may seem like a strange question. I am pretty sure what I think, but I am curious to see how others interpret it.
I work with pregnant and birthing women. When labour is going slowly, one recommendation is for the mom and husband to engage in sexual activity. This is one of the most effective and safest ways to stimulate the hormones that stimulate labour; although their are synthetic versions available, they have many more risks to mother and child, and of course have to be administered at the hospital. In many cases, actual intercourse is not allowed because of the possibility of infection, or totally impracticable for the labouring woman.
Do people think this would this violate the idea that sexual activity is always meant to end in normal intercourse and ejaculation? My thought is that it is directed entirely toward the delivery of a healthy baby, the natural product of sexual activity, it makes perfect sense.
I work with pregnant and birthing women. When labour is going slowly, one recommendation is for the mom and husband to engage in sexual activity. This is one of the most effective and safest ways to stimulate the hormones that stimulate labour; although their are synthetic versions available, they have many more risks to mother and child, and of course have to be administered at the hospital. In many cases, actual intercourse is not allowed because of the possibility of infection, or totally impracticable for the labouring woman.
Do people think this would this violate the idea that sexual activity is always meant to end in normal intercourse and ejaculation? My thought is that it is directed entirely toward the delivery of a healthy baby, the natural product of sexual activity, it makes perfect sense.