S
SavedbyHisBlood
Guest
Does anyone know the significance of this? I read that it was an apperation of the Virgin Mary but i really dont know much more about it.
What is your opinion regarding the painting itself? The material has not deterioated in 500 years. My understanding is the material should only last at the most 50 years. The painting is said to float and really isn’t on the surface of the material. Supposedly, in one eye of the Virgin is Juan Diego and in the other the bishop. I believe that was just recently discovered.The Juan Diego canonization committee ignored presentations (including one from a Mexican Catholic prelate) which cast doubt that there even was a Juan Diego. But alas the deed is done, not much we can do about it now. The Juan Diego story is much like legends surrounding the scapular or the rosary, where, maybe 100 years after the fact, there will be a supernatural origin for it. I personally view the Guadalupe image as a pious painting that eventually developed an extraordinary story surrounding it, and which helped bring a lot of people into the Church and away from paganism, human sacrifice, and what not.
John, I can’t get your 1st. link to open, but the second one is not even a Catholic site.These links cover the ground better than anything I can offer but it tells you where I am coming from. And as you say, people are free to believe what they want, or not.
latinamericanstudies.org/religion/myth.htm
findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1058/is_15_119/ai_90190872/
defunct link at CSICOP
You really are going to have to come uo with more reliable sources than the Washington Post.These links cover the ground better than anything I can offer but it tells you where I am coming from. And as you say, people are free to believe what they want, or not.
latinamericanstudies.org/religion/myth.htm
findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1058/is_15_119/ai_90190872/
defunct link at CSICOP
Last night on THE WORLD OVER, EWTN, it was reported changes have been made in the Mass. I was wondering if that will include the Memorare.Our Lady of Guadalupe is, indeed the patroness of the Americas. New Orleans has had an OLOG parish for over a hundred years and my cathedral parish in Baton Rouge has a full-sized image of the tilma framed and on display. It is not a Mexican cultural affectation because this is French south Louisiana.
For those of us who grew up before Vatican II, we recited the Memorare. Haven’t heard it at all of late because we might upset our Protestant brethren.
The Blessed Mother is a powerful intercessor on our behalf.
I remember the old Douay Rheims bible footnotes which said that the woman was the Church. But it identified the woman as the Vigin Mary in an allegorical way.This is true. Specifically, the Image portrays Revelation 12:1-2, which says, “A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars. She was with child and wailed aloud in pain as she labored to give birth.”
Probably not. The Memorare was never part of Mass. We could talk about the decline of devotion to Our Lady which followed after Vatican II. It was certainly a different world before.Last night on THE WORLD OVER, EWTN, it was reported changes have been made in the Mass. I was wondering if that will include the Memorare.
This thing about upsetting our Protestant brethren: how many have converted because we’ve changed the Mass, removed statues etc? How many come to a Mass? I’ve never understood this reasoning.