R
rben20
Guest
I couldn’t help but notice that the laity does not respond at all in the EF. Much of it is silent prayer (if the laity chooses to respond) and the Altar Servers are the ones who do the responding for the people. Compare that to the OF, and the laity is very involved in responding to the prayers. Even the prayers that are said quietly by the priest in the EF are now said aloud in the OF.
Reflecting on these differences, I’ve come to ask what exactly is the role of the laity in the EF of the Mass as seen in the early Church. Since we all don’t study Latin, what are we to get out of the Mass if we do not understand, hear (priest is particularly quiet in the Mass of the Faithful), or can even respond? I know that we are present to worship God in the most Holy Sacrifice, but as far as responding, hearing, understanding…what are your views?
Let me say that I am fond of both Masses and recently discovered the EF and quickly fell in love with it…but I do like the OF as well.
Reflecting on these differences, I’ve come to ask what exactly is the role of the laity in the EF of the Mass as seen in the early Church. Since we all don’t study Latin, what are we to get out of the Mass if we do not understand, hear (priest is particularly quiet in the Mass of the Faithful), or can even respond? I know that we are present to worship God in the most Holy Sacrifice, but as far as responding, hearing, understanding…what are your views?
Let me say that I am fond of both Masses and recently discovered the EF and quickly fell in love with it…but I do like the OF as well.