Latin and Eastern devotions

  • Thread starter Thread starter BVMFatima
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

BVMFatima

Guest
What are some devotions the Latin Church has that the East does not have, and what are some devotions the East has that us Latins dont have?
 
All of them

None

The Latin concept of devotion is alien to the East and any devotion you find in the East is a Latinization.
What about the prayer rule of the Theotokos? It is extremely similar to the Rosary yet predates the Rosary by centuries.
 
An interesting response to an interesting question while it is well intentioned it can come off as innocent at best or contentious at worst.

The key devotions that currently stand out are the Rosary, Divine Mercy Chaplet, Stations of the Cross, etc on the Latin side. Yet in the East there is the Jesus Prayer, Monasticism, Hesychasm etc.

While it may seem that the Latin has more well known devotions per se; that doesn’t mean that one side is superior to the other. Especially considering that each lung is a part of the body of Christ. The Latin lung had to deal with the rise of scientific thought and Luther. The East had to deal with the rise of Nestorianism and then Islam. Then through in politics (ie EGO) and voila schism.

Perhaps i’m mistaken after all this is just my opinion.
 
Generally what you’ll find in the East that even seemingly private prayers are considered liturgical in some sense. Paraliturgical may be the word I’m looking for, but still. But we don’t really have things like the St. Michael chaplet and so on. I like some of the Latin devotions even though I’ve found that I prefer Eastern spirituality, so personally I keep practicing them. I wouldn’t personally count the Jesus Prayer as a devotion though — it’s more like a spiritual exercise. There are Akathists as well, the most common and official one being the one to the Theotokos — it’s recited at church during Lent. But even that goes to show you the public nature of our prayers.
 
The Eastern Catholic Churches have many beautiful Akathists and Molebens. My favorite is probably Jesus Christ Lover Of Mankind.
 
There are certainly devotions common to East and West (in the sense of “prayers or religions acts that are not obligatory, and generally chosen by the one doing them”):
  • lighting candles and praying before a holy image
  • making pilgrimages
  • reading the Scriptures, especially the psalter and the Gospels (the latter being popular both in old Russia and in medieval England)
Even the akathists noted above, when incorporated into a liturgical service, are often appointed “if the priest desires it.” In this sense, they are not that much different from the selection of a set of votive Mass propers in the West. And of course, layfolk in both east and west had collections of non-liturgical prayers for centuries, alongside ecclesial liturgical services and monastic practices.

Jeff Mierzejewski
 
What about the prayer rule of the Theotokos? It is extremely similar to the Rosary yet predates the Rosary by centuries.
Sorry, what I meant was devotions is seen as an entirely different thing in the East and thus Latin devotions do not fit our spirituality the same way our devotions do not fit the Latin spirituality. Even the use of Prayer Rules has a different application to Eastern spiritual life than it does with Latin prayers such as the Rosary or the Divine Mercy Chaplet.
 
The Eastern Catholic Churches have many beautiful Akathists and Molebens. My favorite is probably Jesus Christ Lover Of Mankind.
Which is a Latinization. Or should I say, a Byzantinization of the Sacred Heart. But a Latinization nonetheless.
 
Which is a Latinization. Or should I say, a Byzantinization of the Sacred Heart. But a Latinization nonetheless.
Isn’t a certain degree of sharing acceptable? I’ve often see Eastern icons in Latin churches, for example.
 
Yet in the East there is the Jesus Prayer, Monasticism, Hesychasm etc.
None of these are devotions. Monasticism is a way of life. People in religious orders are, to some degree, considered monastics. Though monasticism in the East is indeed different from Western spiritual life in religious orders. Though there are some Western orders that are very close to Eastern monasticism, like the Trappists. All in the East are called to be monastics to some degree, even lay people. It is not exclusive to those who are tonsured and live in the mountains, caves, or desert. Though they might be sometimes called true monastics as opposed to most lay persons who have only a certain degree of monastic life in them.

The Jesus Prayer and Hesychasm aren’t devotions. Hesychasm is asceticism, a way of life where one focuses on spiritual growth by deep, inner prayer. The Jesus Prayer is one of the ways to practice Hesychasm.
 
I have it in booklet form and it was published by the Eparchy of St Nicholas of the Ukrainian Catholic Church.
 
Isn’t a certain degree of sharing acceptable? I’ve often see Eastern icons in Latin churches, for example.
Spirituality isn’t Lego where you can take different blocks and build something out of it. Every piece is more like a picture puzzle where they should fit with each other and build a complete picture. Inserting a foreign piece will not produce the right complete picture, it may not even fit anywhere on the puzzle. And it goes both ways. I doubt that icons in the Roman Catholic Church is seen in the same way it is in the Eastern Churches. Sometimes icons are there because they are seen as religious art, even though Eastern Christians don’t see icons as merely religious art.
 
While it may seem that the Latin has more well known devotions per se; that doesn’t mean that one side is superior to the other.
It is not about one side being superior to the other. But as I mentioned in a previous post, spirituality isn’t just something you can jumble up and you can pick and choose however you want to do it. The Church isn’t a spiritual buffet where you can choose what to have on your plate. It’s not about being right or wrong, but being compatible in the bigger spiritual picture. Every practice is meant to build upon a spirituality based on one’s tradition. If we are going to mix and match East and West, why not mix and match with other faith practices as well? That is dangerous territory.
Especially considering that each lung is a part of the body of Christ. The Latin lung had to deal with the rise of scientific thought and Luther. The East had to deal with the rise of Nestorianism and then Islam. Then through in politics (ie EGO) and voila schism.

Perhaps i’m mistaken after all this is just my opinion.
I’m starting to believe that this two-lung theory is wrong at its very core. Or maybe we are not understanding it the way it was meant. It suggests that the East, with 5 Rites, is lumped together as one lung, regardless with our own variation in traditions. That is one thing wrong with it. The other is the inferrence that each Tradition is not complete on its own and must take in other traditions to be complete. There is great danger in that understanding. It means for the most part of our history we only practiced half of Christianity? We each only have Christianity Lite instead of having the fullness of Apostolic Faith expressed in different ways?
 
Eastern Catholics in places like Ukraine, Ruthenia, Czech Republic, etc practiced both Eastern and Western devotions, Adoration, Sacred Heart, Rosary, etc. Some of them may be declared Saints in the near future. They ‘mixed and matched’ as some now call it, and instead of it leading them into ‘dangerous territory’ it brought them great personal holiness.
 
Eastern Catholics in places like Ukraine, Ruthenia, Czech Republic, etc practiced both Eastern and Western devotions, Adoration, Sacred Heart, Rosary, etc. Some of them may be declared Saints in the near future. They ‘mixed and matched’ as some now call it, and instead of it leading them into ‘dangerous territory’ it brought them great personal holiness.
Like who?
 
It is not about one side being superior to the other. But as I mentioned in a previous post, spirituality isn’t just something you can jumble up and you can pick and choose however you want to do it. The Church isn’t a spiritual buffet where you can choose what to have on your plate. It’s not about being right or wrong, but being compatible in the bigger spiritual picture. Every practice is meant to build upon a spirituality based on one’s tradition. If we are going to mix and match East and West, why not mix and match with other faith practices as well? That is dangerous territory.
No tradition developed in a vacuum. East has influenced West and vice versa for the entire history of Christianity. Perhaps you don’t mean this in the way that I’ve interpreted it, but it seems arrogant for either “side” to presume that the spirituality of the other has nothing to offer unless one takes it as a whole.
 
No tradition developed in a vacuum. East has influenced West and vice versa for the entire history of Christianity. Perhaps you don’t mean this in the way that I’ve interpreted it, but it seems arrogant for either “side” to presume that the spirituality of the other has nothing to offer unless one takes it as a whole.
There was actually a vacuum of 500 years after the Great Schism and before any of the unions. Surprisingly, this is when most of what we recognize as the faith is today developed and “finalized”, for the lack of a better term.
 
There was actually a vacuum of 500 years after the Great Schism and before any of the unions. Surprisingly, this is when most of what we recognize as the faith is today developed and “finalized”, for the lack of a better term.
True - but there was certainly a lot of cross-sharing during the first thousand years. Benedictine monasticism, the core of Western religious life, ultimately traces its origins to the Desert Fathers of the Coptic tradition…as does Byzantine monasticism.

Going back to the theme of this thread, I think we have to recognize that the Latin Church is very large and diverse - there isn’t a single Latin spirituality - there are several. Franciscan spirituality is very different from Benedictine spirituality which is very different from Carmelite spirituality. Private devotions such as the rosary or divine office reflect the popular spirituality of much of the laity - but even the specific nature of these popular devotions varies greatly from country to country. The devotional life of Latins here in the Dominican Republic is very foreign to me in many regards compared to the devotional life of Latin Catholics back home in Canada. I don’t think we can make sweeping generalizations about the West vs the East. The East is more universally liturgical in its spiritual life, but we must remember that Vatican II encouraged the lay faithful of the Latin Church to participate daily in the divine office. My personal prayer life is more centered around the Liturgy of the Hours than any private devotion, and I"m a lay Latin. I think this is a growing trend. The Rosary itself, while a beautiful devotion, is “inspired” by the liturgy - 150 Aves to symbolize the 150 psalms of the Pslater…the Pater Noster and Doxology taken also from the liturgy.
 
The Latin concept of devotion is alien to the East and any devotion you find in the East is a Latinization.
That sounds really nice and I know there’s this wish to purge all the Eastern churches of Latinizations. But realistically, people love the devotions and there’s only so much purging you can do before you insult or hurt people.

Including yourself - I’ve seen an awful lot of elderly babushkas praying their Rosaries before and after the Divine Liturgy, and I’m not at all inclined to tell them their devotion is wrong or “alien”. If you want to, go ahead, but watch out for those canes. 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top