A
Armyvet007
Guest
So you discredit the entire traditional Catholic spirituality with a “by the way” statement that has no basis in fact and is said as an aside, calling tradition a “fixation,” as if it were a psychological disorder.
**That was not my intent. I apologize for my poor words and the resulting insult.
My issue isn’t with traditionalists *. My issue is the “form over function” elements within traditionalism [it has to be in Latin to be valid, priests who don’t like/perform the TLM are somehow less of a priest then those that do, OF is somehow less reverent because it doesn’t have X or Y in it, the only reason you can do Z is because the Church gave special permission to Z but Z is still wrong/invalid, unless you go to a TLM you aren’t really a good Catholic, I’ll drive hours to another parish to find a TLM instead of going to my parish OF Mass, etc.] That to me smacks of people placing the form of the Mass above the function of it; and that’s the group I viewed the poster I was responding to be in based on- “we want to restore the remarkable heritage and history that the past few generations stole from us.” That has nothing do with function, but everything to do with form.
As to the fixation part, would “a static snapshot on one period in Church history” be a better way of stating it? Because that is what I see. Before and after X date/time period the Mass wasn’t as “perfect” as it is at X date/time period and it needs to return to how it was at X date/time period.
For someone who just called out someone else about “civility” you do an amazing job of showing disrespect to those on this particular forum who are drawn to traditional Catholic practices.
That I can’t argue with [even if my words matched what I meant to say]. It wasn’t civil.
(which, by the way, is NOT a fixation on American Catholicism as practiced during the first half of the 20th century)
Unlike you, I’ll offer at least one piece of evidence to support my claim. Take a look at most of the groups associated with the traditionalists and you’ll notice that they did not originate in America, but Europe. Furthermore, you’ll notice that traditional Catholicism is found all over the globe, not just in America. I’m sure Bishop Fellay would be amused to find out that he is fixated on American Catholicism…
Either stop attacking traditional Catholicism in the traditional Catholicism forum, or at least educate yourself and offer rational arguments, not unsupported asides.
**Why would I educate myself any further then I have? My first experience, actually my first awareness of traditionalism, was when I started coming to CAF and looking at the traditional forum. Imagine the shock of seeing threads full of posts that attack the Church, praise/created excuses for those who disobeyed it, decry non-traditionalists as being “less Catholic” then traditionalists, and frankly have the same “holier then thou” arrogance I see displayed by the anti-Catholic fundamentalists in my home town and by Americans in general toward anything different from American culture/society. What motivation would I have for educating myself on traditionalism when the first impression I get of it is so negative and when this first impression is repeatedly reinforced?
**
Once again I apologize for my poor word choice and for the resulting insult. I also apologize for the lack of civility and the resulting hypocracy in my post. I am not trying to attack traditionalism. I am defending the non-traditionalism form and function of our faith [part of the issue could be that “a good offense is the best defense” is too ingrained in my thought process] from those within traditionalism that place form over function.
- PAX