V
vjnycguy
Guest
Latin rebirth in schools: Latin is about to undergo a renaissance in schools under plans being draw… t.co/vaaeoFYZ
Benedict XVI
Benedict XVI
my daughter’s charter school taught latin. They did it to give the children (grades k-6th)Well reading the article I don’t see how this will trickle down to the schools where most kids in N. America study. I don’t expect to see Latin taught around here any time soon.
They are teaching it correctly. High schools teach Classical Latin, as they should – it precedes ecclesiastical Latin. To pronounce classical Latin with ecclesiastical pronunciation is simply incorrect.My high school offers Latin, I don’t take it though since I took Spanish in Middle school. However, I’m glad I didn’t take Latin because my high school teaches Latin wrong. They pronounce all V’s as U’s and all double C’s as ck, not as ch. Like Ecce Agnus Dei, would be Ecke. I resolved to learning Ecclesiastical Latin according to Mr. Collins’ Primer and Italian via Berlitz. So while in some respect it is good that Latin returns to high schools, they risk botching the language up. That simply insults it. Languages are art forms!
Not around here, either. Our DRE is a high school language teacher, Latin & German. There are no Latin classes in our school district. She offered to teach Latin, and received an emphatic “no” from the school board.Well reading the article I don’t see how this will trickle down to the schools where most kids in N. America study. I don’t expect to see Latin taught around here any time soon.
There is really no such thing as a “Ecclesiastical pronunciation” of Latin. All it is, is Latin words pronounced as though they were Italian. This was done, of course, by Italian speakers. Similarly, there are versions of Latin pronunciation that treat it as though it were English (now mostly extirpated, but is where we get the standard English pronunciations of words like “Caesar” and “Cicero” from – imagine it all pronounced that way), as though it were German (still vibrant in German-speaking lands), etc. The Italianate pronunciation happens to be the one “preferred by the Church” since the late 1800s or so, but strictly because Italians were running the show. Attempting to impose it on non-Italian-speaking countries was an absolute novelty, and has probably contributed to marginalizing the language.My high school offers Latin, I don’t take it though since I took Spanish in Middle school. However, I’m glad I didn’t take Latin because my high school teaches Latin wrong. They pronounce all V’s as U’s and all double C’s as ck, not as ch. Like Ecce Agnus Dei, would be Ecke. I resolved to learning Ecclesiastical Latin according to Mr. Collins’ Primer and Italian via Berlitz. So while in some respect it is good that Latin returns to high schools, they risk botching the language up. That simply insults it. Languages are art forms!
It sounds barbaric.They are teaching it correctly. High schools teach Classical Latin, as they should – it precedes ecclesiastical Latin. To pronounce classical Latin with ecclesiastical pronunciation is simply incorrect.
You are wrong, not your high school.
I don’t understand why they would say no to her teaching Latin. Latin is not a religion that is only used for a religion, in this case, Catholicism. It is also used in providing scientific names for animals, plants, and I think other things in the field of science as well. Therefore, having a basic education in Latin could be beneficial to any student who plans to have a career in science.Not around here, either. Our DRE is a high school language teacher, Latin & German. There are no Latin classes in our school district. She offered to teach Latin, and received an emphatic “no” from the school board.
So, she teaches German part-time, and is our DRE the rest of the time.
I fail to see how that is a valid basis for misleading students, so I stand by my statement that we should teach Latin in a historically accurate context.It sounds barbaric.
Yes, she told them exactly what you wrote here. They wouldn’t have it, though.I don’t understand why they would say no to her teaching Latin. Latin is not a religion that is only used for a religion, in this case, Catholicism. It is also used in providing scientific names for animals, plants, and I think other things in the field of science as well. Therefore, having a basic education in Latin could be beneficial to any student who plans to have a career in science.
The same can probably also be said about law, since there are many Latin expressions which have formed the basis of Roman law, the principles of which the U.S. was set up to follow.I don’t understand why they would say no to her teaching Latin. Latin is not a religion that is only used for a religion, in this case, Catholicism. It is also used in providing scientific names for animals, plants, and I think other things in the field of science as well. Therefore, having a basic education in Latin could be beneficial to any student who plans to have a career in science.