Latin's death rattle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rwoehmke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rwoehmke

Guest
A Catholic News Service article by John Thavis which may be viewed by clicking on World News at the site [ explains the difficulty that the Bishops at the recent synod on the Eucharist had with the Latin language. Apparently Latin is taking a hit even in the upper reaches of the Church. This would appear to bode ill for any widespread return of the Latin Mass anytime soon. Will the daily missal one day soon have the Mass in the vernacular on one side and the Mass in English on the other?]( explains the difficulty that the Bishops at the recent synod on the Eucharist had with the Latin language. Apparently Latin is taking a hit even in the upper reaches of the Church. This would appear to bode ill for any widespread return of the Latin Mass anytime soon. Will the daily missal one day soon have the Mass in the vernacular on one side and the Mass in English on the other?)
 
We have guitar masses and pumpkin carving at masses. I guess we’ll have a latinless Church in a few decades. 😦

:bigyikes: :tsktsk:
  • Kathie :bowdown:
 
Since Latin is the official language of the Roman Church it doesn’t speak well of the bishops, especially American, that they don’t know it. No wonder they have so much trouble comprehending other things.
Maybe they should go back to a qualified seminary.



 
40.png
rwoehmke:
Will the daily missal one day soon have the Mass in the vernacular on one side and the Mass in English on the other?
One could only hope! I would love to have a Mass in (real) English!
 
The cited article (link) is a bit misleading. When it says:
Latin came up in one of the synod propositions on liturgy, which called for training of seminarians so they are able to say Mass and lead prayers in Latin. But a proposal to promote Mass in Latin for international, multilingual gatherings of Catholics was downgraded from a recommendation to a suggestion.
It is true the proposal to promote Latin at international gatherings of multilingual congregants was finalized as a “suggestion”. However the same proposal “recommends” that priests be prepared in seminary to understand and celebrate the Mass in Latin. It also urges a “not neglect the possibility” of educating the faithful. (link)

tee
 
Someone had just told me this today, but then went on to say not to fear. I guess our Holy Father (God bless him!) isn’t going to back down and have everything translated for them. Actually, he gave his homily to these latinless people in, yes, you guessed right, LATIN! He obviously is not going to let latin become extinct in the Church. Praised be to God for such a wonder Pope!
 
40.png
snow_white:
Someone had just told me this today, but then went on to say not to fear. I guess our Holy Father (God bless him!) isn’t going to back down and have everything translated for them. Actually, he gave his homily to these latinless people in, yes, you guessed right, LATIN! He obviously is not going to let latin become extinct in the Church. Praised be to God for such a wonder Pope!
Oh, now that was brilliant. To prove a point, he preaches in a language they don’t understand? He will win the battle and lose the war. Instruct the faithful in a language they don’t understand, broaden the chasim that already exists between Rome and the people. How do you say schisim in Latin?

Nohome
 
40.png
Nohome:
Oh, now that was brilliant. To prove a point, he preaches in a language they don’t understand? He will win the battle and lose the war. Instruct the faithful in a language they don’t understand, broaden the chasim that already exists between Rome and the people. How do you say schisim in Latin?

Nohome
I very much doubt if the Holy Father had any intent of the kind, either using his homily to emphasize Latin in and of itself or as a kind of gauntlet to fling in the face of the bishops. It’s the official language of the Church, what was he supposed to use, English? French, the language of diplomacy? Switch about for the whole of the homily? I think he speaks several languages, but he isn’t the polyglot that the old Holy Father was. They had headsets and translators, it isn’t that big a deal. Latin isn’t going to be abandoned and I bet you see more of this: bishops at meetings with headphones on.
 
tom.wineman said:
Since Latin is the official language of the Roman Church it doesn’t speak well of the bishops, especially American, that they don’t know it. No wonder they have so much trouble comprehending other things.
Maybe they should go back to a qualified seminary.




Tom:

The Israelis managed to find a way to Resurrect Hebrew, which was even deader than Latin is now. So we shouldn’t give up hope,…but maybe we could learn how the Israelis did it and then apply the lesson.

One thing they did is made the language something people used every day by as many people as possible: Teach in Latin; write in Latin; buy and sell in Latin; govern in Latin; and, yes, worship in Latin.

If you can have most of the world’s educated Catholics doing this 3 hours hours per day, that should do the trick.

As long as Latin is something that a few Priests, Bishops, Cardinals and members of the Curia do, Latin as a live language is doomed!

The only way Latin can remain a live language is if Latin is used by educated Catholics everywhere!

One benefit of this is that, when the persecution starts, Catholics will have a way to communicate with each other that the rest of the world won’t be able to understand, or will understand only after consulting Latin experts.

That would give Catholics an advantage over the persecuters when it comes to communications.

So, for the sake of the Church, Latin must be saved.

In Christ, Michael
 
40.png
Nohome:
Oh, now that was brilliant. To prove a point, he preaches in a language they don’t understand? He will win the battle and lose the war. Instruct the faithful in a language they don’t understand, broaden the chasim that already exists between Rome and the people. How do you say schisim in Latin?

Nohome
Nohome:

He taught in a language ALL Educated Catholics understood until about 50 years ago. He taught in a language my pastor is fluent in, and he’s ANGLICAN.

Maybe you should be asking why the Cardinals and Bishops decided they didn’t need to speak, read and write a language that ALL educated Catholics spoke, read and wrote until some 50 years ago… Maybe you should ask why they’re not fluent in a language that an ANGLICAN Priest is.

Actually, based on the postings from here, I would say the chasm exists between heretical and apostate Bishops and the people in their Dioceses (I live in one of those Dioceses), and not between the people and Rome (to whom the people often appeal) as you’re claiming.

The Pope wanted to say that the Bishops. priests and those responsible for educating Catholics in theology need to become reasonably fluent in Latin.

For various reasons, I think the Pope is right.

In Christ, Michael
 
40.png
JimG:
One could only hope! I would love to have a Mass in (real) English!
Jim & Rwoehmke:

The Pope is Negotiating with Archbishop Hepworth of the TAC to bring in 285,000 Anglican Catholics as part of a Sui Iuris Rite within the Catholic Church. If this works, we’ll probably pick up a couple of million of the Anglicans for the “Southern Cone” who are going to leave the Anglican Communion over the problems the communion has with heresy and apostasy.

If you have an Anglican Use parish (That’s Catholic with Pastoral Provision to use an adopted Anglican Liturgy), near you or near where you’re travelling, go to the mass and see what it’s like.

If you want to see what one of our liturgies looks like, try St. John’s Anglican Church one Sunday after you’ve fulfilled your Sunday obligation:
stjohnsanglicanchurch.com/

My parish is here:
St. Mary of the Angel’s
stmaryoftheangels.org/

The services of all of the above are in real English. You will also notice that the translation of the Novus Ordo used by in most English speaking countries is much better than the one adopted for use in America.

I don’t understand why the USCCB chose to go with the inferior translation when a better one was available.

In Christ, Michael
 
Traditional Ang:
One benefit of this is that, when the persecution starts, Catholics will have a way to communicate with each other that the rest of the world won’t be able to understand, or will understand only after consulting Latin experts.
During a time of persecution, speaking Latin would be the equivalent of speaking Yiddish in WWII Germany. That said there is value in knowing Latin that goes far beyond Church. Many concepts of common law are still in Latin (though horribly mispronounced on TV) 🙂 . I was required to take Latin as an undergrad in science and it remains a tool in biologic taxonomy.

A basic understanding of Latin would get you on the bus, through the subway or checked into a hotel in most of Western Europe until English became ubiquitous. I even find Latin useful in the study of Japanese because most phonyms can be understood using the Latin pronounciation (あ、い、う、え、お = a,i,u,e,o)

I just fail to see what Latin will do for the common Catholic. I think it would drive away more people from the Church than it would attract. My kids already hate religious education as it is, throw in another language and you’ve lost another generation.

Nohome
 
40.png
abcdefg:
How about in Middle or Old English?
Only if someone finds a Middle English missal written by Chaucer, or perhaps some undiscovered, out of character, Beowulf missal! (For my money, the best thing about the Norman conquest was the eventual transformation of OE into ME.)
Traditional Ang:
If you have an Anglican Use parish (That’s Catholic with Pastoral Provision to use an adopted Anglican Liturgy), near you or near where you’re travelling, go to the mass and see what it’s like.
That sounds promising. I guess that would be English English rather than ICEL English.

(My ideal would have been to have the Mass translated into English by T.S. Eliot, but I guess he was dead by the time there was a need for it.)
 
40.png
Nohome:
During a time of persecution, speaking Latin would be the equivalent of speaking Yiddish in WWII Germany. That said there is value in knowing Latin that goes far beyond Church. Many concepts of common law are still in Latin (though horribly mispronounced on TV) 🙂 . I was required to take Latin as an undergrad in science and it remains a tool in biologic taxonomy.

A basic understanding of Latin would get you on the bus, through the subway or checked into a hotel in most of Western Europe until English became ubiquitous. I even find Latin useful in the study of Japanese because most phonyms can be understood using the Latin pronounciation (??? = a,i,u,e,o)

I just fail to see what Latin will do for the common Catholic. I think it would drive away more people from the Church than it would attract. My kids already hate religious education as it is, throw in another language and you’ve lost another generation.

Nohome
Nohome:

It’s different from Yiddish, Most of the Germans could understand Yiddish. It would be more like one of the Native American Languages in the USA, except in this case, Catholics are the one eliminating Latin. And, very few non-Catholics understand Ecclesiastical Latin.

I saying that It would be useful as a code, esp. if someone then added a code on tope of the language itself. Think in terms of the “Navajo Code Talkers” writ large. Did you know the word “Mass” was originally a code word for the Eucharist derived from “Eta, Missa Est” (“Go, You are Dismissed”). Just like the “FISH” was a code sign (One Christian drew one curved line. The other, if he was a fellow believer, finished the FISH by drawing the other line).

You would be very supprised at what becomes useful during times of persecution.

Regarding Latin chasing people awya,

Until the last 50 years, the Catholic Church was growing through evangelism as much as through Brithrate. That was when the Church had the Latin Mass and required educated Catholics to learn some Latin.

Since Vatican II, all of that has been dropped, along with Mass Attendence, membership in the parishes and vocations to the Sacred Priesthood. Meanwhile, the most heavily attended Parishes, and those producing the most vocations, are those doing Indult LATIN Masses. Based on the above, I’d say the effect of having Latin was and is the exact opposite from you claimed it would be.

With what passes for “Religious Education” in many Catholic Schools today, I don’t blame your kids. You might ask your kids what they’re teaching them in “Religous Education”. At the same time, you might want to CAREFULLY examine the materials they’ve been given or even tape record one or two of the clases. I’m sure this would be an eye-opener!

Regarding teaching kids another Language - Most kids in Europe learn how to speak at least 3 languages, and it doesn’t turn them off. I used to know 3 European Soccer players who all spoke at least 4 languages fluently.

Kids aren’t turned off by being challenged. They’re turned off by being BORED! They’re also turned off by subject matter that’s poorly presented by people who obviously don’t care about them or the subject matter.

As long as the subject matter is well presented by people who care about the kids and the subject, and who want to challenge the kids, the kids won’t get turned off.

At least that what I’ve seen.

In Christ, Michael
 
40.png
JimG:
Only if someone finds a Middle English missal written by Chaucer, or perhaps some undiscovered, out of character, Beowulf missal! (For my money, the best thing about the Norman conquest was the eventual transformation of OE into ME.)

That sounds promising. I guess that would be English English rather than ICEL English.

(My ideal would have been to have the Mass translated into English by T.S. Eliot, but I guess he was dead by the time there was a need for it.)
Jim:

Well, the English Missal is one generation removed from Shakespeare, and was a revision of a Missal done during the Reign of Henry VII…

It just might be down your alley, as far as language is concerned.

Pray for us and that this crazy idea works. If it does, not only will you have the Parish close by you that I linked, but you’ll have a lot of “orthodox” Anglican national juridictions who just might come on over (As well as a couple of Dioceses and parishes in the USA and Canada).

And, as far as I’m concerned, the more the merrier, and then I and a couple of others don’t have to wait for Mahony to be replaced.

In Christ, Michael
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top