"Laudato Si" from Pope Francis too Depressing for Bedtime Reading; How to cope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ethereality
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

ethereality

Guest
I had to stop 15% into the Pope’s new encyclical “Laudato Si”: It’s too depressing for bedtime reading. It presents a dichotomy: Either we radically change how we’re living, adopting a life of sacrifice rather than convenience (our technology trades pollution for convenience), or we continue destroying our planet. And it seems to me most are too self-centered to even bother reading his letter, let alone live such a life of patience and self-denial.

Where are the promising signs to chase away my despair? Only the hope of the life to come after I die? So far, with the self-centered collective destruction of our planet I see only one more reason to die, not another reason to live.

Is there any chance the next G8 Summit will bear good fruit? How can we apply brakes to our culture which consists of hyper-specialized full-time jobs with one goal to the exclusion of all else?

Answering my question, “How to cope?” I would say we must accept that we are in a dire situation, and personally work to change it one day at a time:

  1. *]I will continue reading the encyclical, but not, I think, before bed. Perhaps when I am sitting on public transportation, etc.
    *]Last night I felt called to change careers, from radiation oncology for the rich (cancer therapy in the USA or Japan) to establishing clean drinking water for the poor (those who lack clean drinking water), or go into energy to either increase battery storage, solar technology, or infrastructure (e.g. recycling),
    *]but I am currently a slave to my American student loan debt ($137k @ ~7.1% interest) which I incurred getting a Master’s degree to work in radiation oncology as a physicist. The only way out appears to be working in this field for another 10-15 years (i.e. until I am 38-43).
    *]Try to educate others through personal conversation, political correspondence, and internet discussion.
    *]Live my life as an example, e.g. getting up at dawn to minimize electricity use (saying goodbye to evening parties), cooking my own meals to minimize waste from convenience stores,[1] taking the stairs rather than elevator, using fans rather than air conditioning, clothing rather than heating, dressing appropriately rather than fashionably (white clothing in the summer to reflect heat, black clothing in the winter to absorb it), using a bicycle rather than a car.

    I don’t know what to do about the problem of ridicule, though: I shared my thoughts with some incoming students (first year Japanese master’s students, me being a first year American doctoral student) about taking the elevator one flight short and walking the last flight to save energy, and they just laughed at me and declared it strange. (Our student room is on the eighth floor.)

    They were Japanese, so that’s a different set of problems,[2] but as for Americans, do they not think in terms of moral relativism, hence undermining “leading by example”? I have been told the solution to moral relativism is to be happy, and then leading by example will work because people will want to be as happy as you. I do not know how to be happy, though, because I am suffering so much (physically and psychologically): I cannot be happy knowing that I have a loving Father in heaven who will make everything right, because I cannot regard these thoughts as knowledge rather than hope. (If someone were to ask me if Christianity were true, I would have to tell them that I hope it is but don’t know that it is. I know that I suffer, but I don’t know that my suffering is worth it.)

    What are your thoughts on all these matters?

    [1] It is common in Japan to buy meals from convenience stores to eat at one’s desk to minimize time spent not working; of course all the plastic wrapping is thrown away. The alternative is bringing a ‘bentou’ or boxed lunch, i.e. a “sack lunch” from home.
    [2] The Japanese think in “us/them” categories, so it will be very, very difficult for them to see me as a role model, rather than as “an American”. They would need to see a Japanese person do something to regard it as a role model, and even then, Japanese don’t change their custom unless everyone does it. I likewise asked my part-time boss (Canadian, has lived in Japan >20 years) whether I could open the window instead of use air conditioning, and that idea was shot down because “Japanese companies don’t do that.” So there would need to be some political pressure and government decision; the most I could do would be to encourage the Japanese Christians I know at church to contact their politicians.
 
Stop reading it and live your life as usual. It’s an encyclical, not the 11th commandment. Catholics are not bound by it and there is no need to despair over it; there is no need to change careers or stop using the air conditioning.
 
ethereality,

I’m sorry to hear you are suffering, and hope for you to feel better soon. First, remember all things are in God’s hands. I do believe in an afterlife better than this one. We pray to do our best, then we rest in God’s love and grace.

Pope Francis encourages us in *Laudato Si *to take time to connect with the Lord spiritually and to appreciate the nature of the Earth. As a professional in biological science, you probably can appreciate the inner workings of the cells such as are coming to light from research. Here are just some of them:

rcsb.org/pdb/101/motm_archive.do .

These molecules, working together for our bodies, could only come from an intelligent source—our Triune God. Only one God could have put all this together to make life in its abundance and diversity. Such power is awesome.

God has allowed suffering and fallen nature in our world because of sin of humans. He has not wanted robots as his people, but those who have free choice. The Pope works in the hope that people choose what is best, and we should too. This does not happen overnight. Yet no matter what happens, each of us can hope in the Lord for our destiny.
:heaven:
 
How is treating cancer bad? I mean, if you wanna change careers, go for it, but I don’t see it as bad.
Where I’m from, you shouldn’t wear black in the summer or white in the winter. Heck, it’s still hot here in September and you DO NOT wear white after Labor Day.
I’m sorry this is causing you distress, but maybe you should take baby steps if you want to be more “green.” Rome wasn’t built in a day
 
Stop reading it and live your life as usual. It’s an encyclical, not the 11th commandment. Catholics are not bound by it and there is no need to despair over it; there is no need to change careers or stop using the air conditioning.
There’s no need to despair over it, but we should definitely pay attention to it – the Pope is teaching the faithful on moral issues. If you ignore Laudato Si, you can’t complain about those who ignore Humanae Vitae.

There are many small things that most of us could do to help the environment, and that won’t completely upend our lives. Many of the saints have spoken about the necessity of being good stewards of God’s gifts, as well as the necessity of not letting “easy” and “comfortable” be our gods.

Ethereality, I hope you will re-think the change of careers. I really doubt that God is telling you not to continue to save lives.
 
Please remember, it’s not your responsibility to save the world, it’s just your responsibility to do what small part God has given you, and will give you.

You are torturing yourself because of the inaction and indifference of others. This will always exist. Take joy in the small acts you are making, to use the stairs is beneficial in so many ways. Don’t take to heart the mockery of others, and anyway, they may have been secretly impressed even if they did think it strange. We often have so little idea of how we affect people.

The best thing for you to do is pray and ask God for hope. It may help if you to drop the encyclical for a while (do come back to it later though) and read St Augustine’s treatise on Faith, Hope and Love first. The three are very much related. It may give you some spiritual assistance in your future approach to the recent encyclical, and help you avoid this feeling of despair, which will not help anyone at all. Also, it is never good to make big decisions while in a state of despair*… certainly don’t act on any idea of a career change while you feel this way.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enchiridion_of_Augustine
 
Etherreality,

You have received some good advice here. The situation our Holy Father addresses in the encyclical can indeed seem overwhelming. This can cause some to throw up their hands and say, “Not my problem,” and others to perhaps become too apprehensive over things they cannot control. Of course the middle way is best. There are small choices each of us can make to be better stewards of God’s creation. Some of us are in a position to do more, but those who are not should not be distressed. Do what you can. But don’t ignore or disregard Pope Francis’ message, as some would suggest. I am always more optimistic in the morning. Maybe you can read a short section first thing instead of late in the day.

Also, the training you have received can do a lot of good! It is consistent with the pope’s message that we must help the vulnerable, and cancer is a great equalizer, bringing down rich and poor alike. If you can help them, that is a noble calling indeed!
 
There’s no need to despair over it, but we should definitely pay attention to it – the Pope is teaching the faithful on moral issues. If you ignore Laudato Si, you can’t complain about those who ignore Humanae Vitae.

There are many small things that most of us could do to help the environment, and that won’t completely upend our lives. Many of the saints have spoken about the necessity of being good stewards of God’s gifts, as well as the necessity of not letting “easy” and “comfortable” be our gods.

Ethereality, I hope you will re-think the change of careers. I really doubt that God is telling you not to continue to save lives.
Listen to her ^^^^^
 
There’s no need to despair over it, but we should definitely pay attention to it – the Pope is teaching the faithful on moral issues. If you ignore Laudato Si, you can’t complain about those who ignore Humanae Vitae.

There are many small things that most of us could do to help the environment, and that won’t completely upend our lives. Many of the saints have spoken about the necessity of being good stewards of God’s gifts, as well as the necessity of not letting “easy” and “comfortable” be our gods.

Ethereality, I hope you will re-think the change of careers. I really doubt that God is telling you not to continue to save lives.
Good point. I find it sad that the same people who have been berating other Catholics for not strictly adhering to Humanae Vita, are so glibly dismissing Laudato Si. They are both papal encyclicals, one cannot treat one as gospel truth and trash the other. You either respect all papal encyclicals and prayerfully try to follow the popes’ teachings, or you admit that “cafeteria” Catholics who pick and choose which teachings to follow were right all along.

👍
 
Good point. I find it sad that the same people who have been berating other Catholics for not strictly adhering to Humanae Vita, are so glibly dismissing Laudato Si.
Of course one can look at it the other way. There are those that are all in on Laudato Si but ignore Humanae Vita. According to the polls that say many Catholics vote for politicians that support pro contraception and abortion policies it would seem that is more the case.
 
There’s no need to despair over it, but we should definitely pay attention to it – the Pope is teaching the faithful on moral issues. If you ignore Laudato Si, you can’t complain about those who ignore Humanae Vitae.

There are many small things that most of us could do to help the environment, and that won’t completely upend our lives. Many of the saints have spoken about the necessity of being good stewards of God’s gifts, as well as the necessity of not letting “easy” and “comfortable” be our gods.

Ethereality, I hope you will re-think the change of careers. I really doubt that God is telling you not to continue to save lives.
You know, that’s a good point/thought about “if you ignore Laudato Si, you can’t complain about those who ignore Humanae Vitae.” - but, I’m not sure that’s accurate.

Speaking generally about encyclicals, not necessarily these two: it is completely accurate to say that they are not completely infallible. One criteria for infallibility is that the “ex cathedra” statement made is in conformity with the unchanging truths of the Church. It is true that most encyclicals probably mostly conform to the unchanging truths of the Church, but it is conceivable that they don’t. Now to get more specific: As far as I know, the truths of Humanae Vitae do not in any way contradict the truths previously handed down up until that point. For that reason, Catholics cannot reject its exhortations regarding birth control, because it upholds and reinforces what the Church has always taught. Now, I have not read Laudato Si, and I probably won’t (at least, not in full) any time soon, so I am not making assumptions here - all I’m saying is what I think the critcizers of it would say: perhaps it is possible that there are parts of it that are not necessarily false, but are not part of a continuous teaching of the Catholic Church. Therefore, there could be parts of it which we are not required to hold as beliefs of the Catholic Church.

I am sure that whether Laudato Si is a really good encyclical or not, there are parts of it which reinforce and uphold Catholic teachings, and these are the parts which we should accept and follow. On the other hand (I’m probably gonna get chewed out here for saying this): I think Pope Francis has some good things to say about protecting the Earth, and realizing it is a gift from God. However, I must say, in my opinion it is very dangerous not only to support science that is not consensus or proven (basically that climate change/global warming exists and is caused by humans), but science that is overwhelmingly supported by advocates of birth control/contraception, abortion, and population reduction. (I.e., global warming is caused by humans, we better just start controlling the population.) Not necessarily saying he is incorrect, but that’s just the thing - the Pope is putting forth a pretty authoritative document that is at least partially based on the assumption that this science is proven and/or unanimously supported in the science world. Maybe it’s possible that he could have written a similar encyclical that did not make such assumptions.

As a final note, I have heard it thrown around the last few days since the encyclical’s release, as a response to its critics, that “well, St. JPII and Pope Benedict also wrote about care of the environment, Pope Francis is just continuing that tradition!” I would respond that, yes, I’m sure they did, but did they also basically claim that humans are ruining the environment and make the appearance of trying to close the debate on what the cause of climate change and global warming is? Because that’s what encyclicals do for those loyal Catholics who have good intentions, but fail to realize that not everything that is said in encyclicals is required to be believed - they take it all as truth and that it should not be disputed.

Do you get what I’m trying to say? I’ll see if I can sum this up: There are many good things to be said about care of the Earth and the fact that the Earth is God’s creation and a gift to man, but I believe there are ways to do that without supporting unproven/disputed science.
 
Well, there are many who absolutely follow and adhere to what plenty of past popes have written,
But a sitting Pope? Not so much.

He’s our leader. We should at least pray over it after a sincere and thorough reading.
You don’t get to be Pope without scholarship and the promptings of the Holy Spirit, after all.
And anyway, I read it. Seems like all Catholic thoughts…love your neighbor, care for the earth, speak on behalf of the needy, assist those who need help.
I don’t get the panic or the questioning.
Seems like basic Catholic theology to me.

I’m not here to debate, either, just my observation.
Peace to all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top