Lawmakers Tussle Over Role Of Extremists In Protest-Related Violence

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThinkingSapien
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

ThinkingSapien

Guest
Role Of Extremists In Protest-Related Violence Debated In Hearing : Live Updates: House Hearing On Homeland Threats : NPR

Republicans, Democrats and witnesses on Thursday were fighting in microcosm the national political argument over the demonstrations — and some violence — that have followed the police killing.

[…]

Critics, most of whom were Republicans in this hearing, focused on antifa, which they described as a well-organized domestic terror organization. They pressed FBI Director Christopher Wray about what they called antifa’s sources of funding and asked him what the bureau is doing to smash it.

Wray tried to take pains to describe the FBI’s perspective, which is different from the characterizations made by the members of Congress. Antifa, he said, is a “real thing,” but he also characterized it as more of an “ideology or a movement,” as opposed to a terror organization.

An analysis of federal court records in June showed no signs of anti-fascist links in cases brought because of the unrest. Another look at cases in Portland, Ore., showed most federal charges there were misdemeanors. That’s despite Attorney General William Barr’s repeated assertions that antifa is fueling or organizing the violence.

On Thursday, Wray told lawmakers that the protest-related violence “does not appear to be organized or attributed to one particular group or even movement.”

He acknowledged that the FBI has opened investigations into “violent anarchists, extremists” who he said are tied to the antifa movement. The bureau, Wray said, has seen people who self-identify as antifa coalescing regionally into “small groups or nodes,” but he stopped short of declaring it an organization.

That frustrated Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, who said he thought Wray was “downplaying it.” Antifa has “uniforms,” Crenshaw said. It raises money to buy laser dazzlers for use against police; it adopts similar tactics at different protests and so on, he said.

Other Republicans focused their remarks on the deaths and injuries suffered by police in the demonstrations following Floyd’s death.

Their narrative in the hearing room mirrored the message projected at the Republican National Committee this year and other venues: The nation is under siege by anarchists in this telling, and the movement responding to law enforcement in Black communities must be viewed warily because of the extremists who have infiltrated it.

Democrats, especially the panel’s Black lawmakers, pressed Wray from a completely different perspective. Rep. Cedric Richmond, D-La., for example, asked Wray about whether the FBI viewed the Black Lives Matter movement as a target for investigation.
 
Last edited:
Interesting to see the FBI confirm the obviously true statement that Antifa isn’t an organisation. I am interested to see what people on this forum have to say about it. It’s a big problem for a lot of the popular measures against antifa, because naturally you can’t declare something a terrorist organisation that can’t possibly be considered one. If you did so it wouldn’t be totally clear on what the law actually meant, but I suppose it would just be used as a means to crackdown on a broad range of protestors.
 
If you did so it wouldn’t be totally clear on what the law actually meant, but I suppose it would just be used as a means to crackdown on a broad range of protestors.
That’s all it is. They’re fascists, folks, that’s why they don’t like antifascists.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top