I can send you a pm if you like…and really, you’re comparing the mormon temple to sex. I think I’ll use that some time, see what happens.
I think I am coming to understand your attitude a little bit, Rebecca.
Diana, guess what, I don’t consider sex as sacred. Certainly it is private, but I’ve never been bashful about talking about sex. Just, I’m sure the mods here would ban me. My girlfriends and I discuss “stuff” amongst ourselves…give each other intimate “stuff” for use later.
Yep, and that’s what I mean. “Sex” isn’t sacred–at least, the mechanics of it in general are not. However, what goes on between a husband and wife IS, or should be. Discussing sex as an abstract concept is one thing, but the fact that you would discuss the specific sex you have with your husband is quite another, and that’s why I was specific enough to make it about sex between you and your husband. I guess if you don’t think that something that private, that important, and that is supposed to be exclusive to you two is not important enough to keep private and ‘sacred,’ then I can certainly understand why you think nothing else, especially the Temple, is.
…and I can think of nothing else that would possibly be a personal enough analogy to make work. I do honestly think that most people would get the analogy, though.
…and I was not comparing the Temple to sex. I was comparing what happens in the Temple and how we feel about it to the way most married couples feel about the sex they share with one another. It’s not about demeaning the Temple to the level of sex as you think of it, as 'it’s just sex," either, m’dear. It’s about putting marital sex where it belongs: in the specific and “speshul” place it should hold in martial relationships. Sex is NEVER 'just sex."
Or rather, it shouldn’t be. I’m sad that you think it is.