P
pablope
Guest
No problem Camp…saw yourI’m just pulling your leg, my friend. No need to apologize.
And the video you posted was well worth the time. Thanks.![]()
No problem Camp…saw yourI’m just pulling your leg, my friend. No need to apologize.
And the video you posted was well worth the time. Thanks.![]()
Interesting…question, if I may…and I do not want to butt in…please take your time to answer it…Zaffiroborant,
We moved forward from being an intelligence through being organized by Father in Heaven to become a spirit, then we were given mortal life with a physical body through the Creation process that included creating this earth and giving it a purpose for us to be here. That physical Creation process was completed by the Word, Jesus Christ.
Pablope,Interesting…question, if I may…and I do not want to butt in…please take your time to answer it…
If we, humanity was completed by Jesus Christ…what were we before he arrived here on earth? Weren’t there already completed human beings before he arrived here on earth?
If we always existed, then we are neither the creation or literal offspring of God.Zaffiroborant,
We moved forward from being an intelligence through being organized by Father in Heaven to become a spirit, then we were given mortal life with a physical body through the Creation process that included creating this earth and giving it a purpose for us to be here. That physical Creation process was completed by the Word, Jesus Christ.
Acts 17: 28-29If we always existed, then we are neither the creation or literal offspring of God.
I don’'t disagree with St. Paul either. But you see he didn’t say anything about being the offspring of Heavenly parents as your Prophet has in a formal declaration to the world. Nor did he say anything about our existing eternally as “intelligences”.Acts 17: 28-29
28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.
29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.
"Definition of CREATION (Merriam-Webster)
1
: the act of creating; especially : the act of bringing the world into ordered existence
2
: the act of making, inventing, or producing: as
a : the act of investing with a new rank or office
b : the first representation of a dramatic role
3
: something that is created: as
a : world
b : creatures singly or in aggregate
c : an original work of art
d : a new usually striking article of clothing
Examples of CREATION
The play continues to entertain audiences 25 years after its creation.
Job creation will be an important issue in next year’s elections.
These changes will lead to the creation of new businesses.
The company was largely the creation of one woman.
Come taste our chef’s delicious new creations.
She’s wearing one of her original fashion creations.
How are humans different from the rest of creation?
First Known Use of CREATION
14th century"
I think the word “creation” fits just fine about us being part of “Creation”.
As to the word “offspring”, I certainly don’t disagree with the Apostle Paul in his use of the word that was translated into the word “offspring”.
Thanks, parker…further questions or clarifications:Pablope,
We were spirits, and so was He–we were imperfect, and He was perfect. He was the Word, Alpha and Omega, the Firstborn. “The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us”. Before He was born, He lived as Jehovah and completed the Creation of this world, and added man (Adam) and woman (Eve) to the physical world to begin bringing about the plan of salvation that included Himself coming to earth as the Savior of the world.
So, yes, there were already completed human beings before He arrived here on earth as the baby Jesus, and He existed before that birth as a Spirit, as God the Son.
Pablope,Thanks, parker…further questions or clarifications:
If there were completed human beings before Christ’s birth, these humans then were perfect already? (no need for further creation) …what happened to those human beings? Aren’t we, in effect, their descendants? What happened to these humans after Christ’s birth?
Dude why do you guys keep calling them out? They’re already “wrong” for a million other reasons way less technical than this. By saying this, you’re like saying that you’re ok with everything else except this. Seriously dude. Theres only like 13 million of them and a billion Catholics. And we know we have an omniscient God who founded a supernatural church who he assured wouldn’t fall into “apostasy.” I think that partially speaks for itself.Mormons please clarify:
“He produced a Spirit like to Himself,” namely Christ. Christ, in this sense, is not the “co-equal,” “eternally begotten,” “same substance” “persona” of the later creeds.
FAIR link
My friend, I asked if you would care to explain LDS beliefs using Scripture or other documents. I must now assume that you do not care to explain, but leave us to glean your answer from one enigmatic passage of your ‘bible’.Campeador,
The answer was “no”. The scripture gave you context for that answer. I tried to make it simpler before, but you wanted “scripture”, not simple. Now you have it both ways…![]()
My friend, my intent is to understand the LDS more fully. This is not a “call out”. Saying “They’re already “wrong” for a million other reasons” suggest a total disrespect for them and their beliefs. Please, try to be more charitable to our wayward brothers and sisters in Christ.Dude why do you guys keep calling them out? They’re already “wrong” for a million other reasons way less technical than this. By saying this, you’re like saying that you’re ok with everything else except this. Seriously dude. Theres only like 13 million of them and a billion Catholics. And we know we have an omniscient God who founded a supernatural church who he assured wouldn’t fall into “apostasy.” I think that partially speaks for itself.
Try understanding our Muslim brothers and sisters who there are actually about a billion of and will actually pose a threat if we don’t have good relations to them and will actually affect your lives or your children’s lives. Seriously if you’re that concerned baout their beliefs you’d research them yourself.My friend, my intent is to understand the LDS more fully. This is not a “call out”. Saying “They’re already “wrong” for a million other reasons” suggest a total disrespect for them and their beliefs. Please, try to be more charitable to our wayward brothers and sisters in Christ.
No one’s got a gun to your head, SnakeMauler. If you don’t like this particular thread then don’t participate.Try understanding our Muslim brothers and sisters who there are actually about a billion of and will actually pose a threat if we don’t have good relations to them and will actually affect your lives or your children’s lives. Seriously if you’re that concerned baout their beliefs you’d research them yourself.
God said “let there be light”, and there was light. Doesn’t seem like a process to me. When God speaks his words become reality. I don’t know where you ever got the idea that God organized existing “intelligences” to create human beings. Only God, the Father, Son and Holy Spirit is eternal, everything else is created. Parker, I mean no offense here, but you wonder why the rest of Christianity does not consider Mormons to be Christians? Ideas like this do not help the cause.Zaffiroborant,
We moved forward from being an intelligence through being organized by Father in Heaven to become a spirit, then we were given mortal life with a physical body through the Creation process that included creating this earth and giving it a purpose for us to be here. That physical Creation process was completed by the Word, Jesus Christ.
But why? If they have the fullness of Truth they should proclaim the Truth, not be ambiguous about it.Jello? meet wall.
Interjecting here…it would be nice if the charity concept were to be reciprocated. I do not think that the LDS position regarding the Catholic Church being “apostate” and the official position that Christ abandoned our Church so as to allow JS to lead believers 1800 years later is all that respectful or charitable and it darn sure isn’t true. I am not trying to interfere with the polite interaction here but don’t you have to… sooner or later…challenge a lie?My friend, my intent is to understand the LDS more fully. This is not a “call out”. Saying “They’re already “wrong” for a million other reasons” suggest a total disrespect for them and their beliefs. Please, try to be more charitable to our wayward brothers and sisters in Christ.
Campeador,My friend, I asked if you would care to explain LDS beliefs using Scripture or other documents. I must now assume that you do not care to explain, but leave us to glean your answer from one enigmatic passage of your ‘bible’.
Going back to the FAIR article, it would seem that the LDS place a lot of credence on Lactantius and his work The Divine Institutions, even with his “lack of grasp on Christian principles and his almost utter ignorance of Scripture”. The FAIR author claims that Lactantius’ work “corresponds to LDS doctrine”, and lists some examples. It is in these examples we find the words “God made” and “He produced”, suggesting God made/produced Jesus.
Campeador,But why? If they have the fullness of Truth they should proclaim the Truth, not be ambiguous about it.
Luke 8:16
No man, when he hath lighted a candle, covereth it with a vessel, or putteth [it] under a bed; but setteth [it] on a candlestick, that they which enter in may see the light.