U
USMC_Convert
Guest
Why in one part of the Bible does Jesus say St. John the Baptist is the least in the Kingdom of Heaven and in another part He says those who mislead others are the least in the Kingdom?
Poetic language. Essentially, even John the Baptist, the culmination of the OT prophets, pales in comparison to God’s new covenant through His son, Jesus Christ.Why in one part of the Bible does Jesus say St. John the Baptist is the least in the Kingdom of Heaven and in another part He says those who mislead others are the least in the Kingdom?
Jesus does not say “St. John the Baptist is the least in the Kingdom of Heaven”Why in one part of the Bible does Jesus say St. John the Baptist is the least in the Kingdom of Heaven and in another part He says those who mislead others are the least in the Kingdom?
From the USCCB, regarding verses 17 - 20Here is the other verse (in context):
Matthew 5:17-20 17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. 18 Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place. 19 Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do so will be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever obeys and teaches these commandments will be called greatest in the kingdom of heaven. 20 I tell you, unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter into the kingdom of heaven.”
Good question. I find this confusing too.
- [5:17–20] This statement of Jesus’ position concerning the Mosaic law is composed of traditional material from Matthew’s sermon documentation (see note on Mt 5:1–7:29), other Q material (cf. Mt 18; Lk 16:17), and the evangelist’s own editorial touches. To fulfill the law appears at first to mean a literal enforcement of the law in the least detail: until heaven and earth pass away nothing of the law will pass (Mt 5:18). Yet the “passing away” of heaven and earth is not necessarily the end of the world understood, as in much apocalyptic literature, as the dissolution of the existing universe. The “turning of the ages” comes with the apocalyptic event of Jesus’ death and resurrection, and those to whom this gospel is addressed are living in the new and final age, prophesied by Isaiah as the time of “new heavens and a new earth” (Is 65:17; 66:22). Meanwhile, during Jesus’ ministry when the kingdom is already breaking in, his mission remains within the framework of the law, though with significant anticipation of the age to come, as the following antitheses (Mt 5:21–48) show.
It appears that that specific reference to “the law” is regarding the Mosaic law.
- [5:19] Probably these commandments means those of the Mosaic law. But this is an interim ethic “until heaven and earth pass away.”
Nothing confusing. The law must be obeyed and that’s something Jesus did. That’s why Jesus is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven (the greatest in God’s Administration)Here is the other verse (in context):
Matthew 5:17-20 17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. 18 Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place. 19 Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do so will be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever obeys and teaches these commandments will be called greatest in the kingdom of heaven. 20 I tell you, unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter into the kingdom of heaven.”
Good question. I find this confusing too.