Lectors and duty to read what is written

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrew71
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Andrew71

Guest
The lector at the 4pm mass tonight changed the order of the words in the second reading from"brothers and sisters" to “sisters and brothers”. From what I could tell this was done intentionally. It appears the reader may be somewhat disturbed that brothers comes first, and is wanting to put the word sisters first to make a point. I am glad it really didnt change the meaning. But isn’t this a slippery slope if the Lector feels they can change what is written to meet the ends of ones agenda? Isn’t this wrong?
Should I be disturbed? What should I do?
 
My understanding is that a Lector is supposed to read what is written, nothing more. I suggest sending a polite e-mail to your priest or a deacon in your parish explaining the situation and requesting clarification.
 
I’d leave it as is. If the lector does it again, then contact the pastor.
 
Same here, as a Novus Ordo Lector who understands what exactly it is. Lectoring isn’t about just reading things off a page, nor its other extreme to interject dramatism and self-experiementation of the liturgy into it (though small emphasis might be needed to emphasize a catechecal point or say the name of our Lord Jesus Christ). It is first and foremost the proclaiming (not “reading”) of the Word of God, and we should be thankful that the Church even has allowed laypeople to touch the Word during the Mass post Vatican II, because it was regulated before to those of the Minor orders and clergy only.

In fact all the ministries of altar server/acolyte, lector, usher/porter still have the official ordinary ministers being seminarians and clergy. All laypeople who do these “ministries” in the church are COMISSIONED to do so, not INSTITUTED as those of minor orders in Extraordiary Form apostolates or organizations and seminaries are. It’s not a right, its a **privilege **as a layperson to be even comissioned to do so, so “Say the Black and do the Red” as Fr. Z often quotes.

And as a subpoint point, If you read Paul’s epistles in the Bible, he does not say “Brothers and Sisters” in the actual texts he wrote every single time, possibly never (someone clarify that one). Maybe in actuality he wrote this greeting at the beginning of his epistles as they were letters, but this seems like some kind of liturgical add-on that really is unnecessary overall for the Readings at Mass, and many of the readings at mass are parts of the full chapters or letters in the Bible, not complete readings or epistles.
 
Same here, as a Novus Ordo Lector who understands what exactly it is. Lectoring isn’t about just reading things off a page…
No, it’s not just about reading things off a page, but it is about reading things off a page…
 
Same here, as a Novus Ordo Lector who understands what exactly it is. Lectoring isn’t about just reading things off a page, nor its other extreme to interject dramatism and self-experiementation of the liturgy into it (though small emphasis might be needed to emphasize a catechecal point or say the name of our Lord Jesus Christ). It is first and foremost the proclaiming (not “reading”) of the Word of God, and we should be thankful that the Church even has allowed laypeople to touch the Word during the Mass post Vatican II, because it was regulated before to those of the Minor orders and clergy only.

In fact all the ministries of altar server/acolyte, lector, usher/porter still have the official ordinary ministers being seminarians and clergy. All laypeople who do these “ministries” in the church are COMISSIONED to do so, not INSTITUTED as those of minor orders in Extraordiary Form apostolates or organizations and seminaries are. It’s not a right, its a **privilege **as a layperson to be even comissioned to do so, so “Say the Black and do the Red” as Fr. Z often quotes.

And as a subpoint point, If you read Paul’s epistles in the Bible, he does not say “Brothers and Sisters” in the actual texts he wrote every single time, possibly never (someone clarify that one). Maybe in actuality he wrote this greeting at the beginning of his epistles as they were letters, but this seems like some kind of liturgical add-on that really is unnecessary overall for the Readings at Mass, and many of the readings at mass are parts of the full chapters or letters in the Bible, not complete readings or epistles.
Since you brought it up, a Lector IS still an instituted ministry. What you are referring to is a “Reader” who perfoms essentially the same duties as a Lector but is, as you point out, commissioned rather then instituted. (and Readers can be male or female while Lectors are always male)
 
The lector at the 4pm mass tonight changed the order of the words in the second reading from"brothers and sisters" to “sisters and brothers”. From what I could tell this was done intentionally. It appears the reader may be somewhat disturbed that brothers comes first, and is wanting to put the word sisters first to make a point. I am glad it really didnt change the meaning. But isn’t this a slippery slope if the Lector feels they can change what is written to meet the ends of ones agenda? Isn’t this wrong?
Should I be disturbed? What should I do?
How in the world could you tell it was intentional, and even if you could, how do you know the reader’s reasoning?

Readers should not change the text of the readings for the Mass. But we should not be listening for every slip and imputing meaning to them. If over time you notice a consistent pattern with a particular reader, you could mention it to your priest in private.

If your parish does not have a large roster of readers, perhaps you could ask about becoming one yourself.
 
How in the world could you tell it was intentional, and even if you could, how do you know the reader’s reasoning?

Readers should not change the text of the readings for the Mass. But we should not be listening for every slip and imputing meaning to them. If over time you notice a consistent pattern with a particular reader, you could mention it to your priest in private.

If your parish does not have a large roster of readers, perhaps you could ask about becoming one yourself.
You are right! There is no way I could tell if it was intentional at the time I heard it, however another parishoner mentioned that this particular reader has made this particular edit of “Sister and Brothers” before…thus it is Intentional.

So instead of making this into a court case of he said she said, let me ask the question this way. Are Lectors or Readers allowed to intentionally change the wording of the readings during Mass in the manner stated above?
 
+It is . . . absolutely not permitted . . . the Holy See has authorized a particular translation of Sacred :bible1: Scripture to be used during the liturgical Holy Prayer of the Mass . . . this individual is arbitrarily and willfully substituting his/her judgement for that of our Holy Mother Church’s Magesterium . . .

The **Scriptural **revelation of the anthropological nature of the creation of man first . . . and the creation of woman from a rib taken from the side of man (close to his heart to be loved and under his arm to be protected as it is so often preached) second . . . is the simple . . . sound . . . :bible1: Biblical basis for placing “brothers” before “sisters” . . .

I suspect the reader/lector has been led astray by the rampant feminism that is afoot nowadays . . . which is attempting to contaminate and corrupt so profoundly so many translations of Sacred :bible1: Scripture . . . Holy Hymns centuries old . . . the Creeds . . . etc., etc., etc. . . . below is a link to the wonderfully revealing document from EWTN’s library from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of the Holy See regarding such attempts to usurp the authority of our Holy Mother Catholic Church’s Magesterium . . . and to illicitly arbitrarily and capriciously personally change Sacred :bible1: Scripture . . . the Holy Thoughts of God . . . to suit individual misguided unauthorized personal tastes . . .

:compcoff: **Link to the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith’s Document on this subject: **ewtn.com/library/CURIA/CDFNORMS.HTM

. . . all for Jesus+
. . . thank You Sweet Spirit of our Holy God+
. . . thank you Blessed Virgin Mary our Mother+
. . . thank you Blessed Holy Mother Church+
 
You are right! There is no way I could tell if it was intentional at the time I heard it, however another parishoner mentioned that this particular reader has made this particular edit of “Sister and Brothers” before…thus it is Intentional.

So instead of making this into a court case of he said she said, let me ask the question this way. Are Lectors or Readers allowed to intentionally change the wording of the readings during Mass in the manner stated above?
No they shouldn’t change the wording, as I said above. Since you know this has been done more than once, you should speak to your pastor privately about this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top