Legalize robot marriage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adamski
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Adamski

Guest
Last night when flipping the channels I came upon a show that was promoting the idea of robot marriage for (not kidding)

They where using the president for gay marriage to push thier ideas and said there are 1000’s of men wanting to marry robots in the US right now and 2 companies are working and life like women robots.
 
Your question makes me think of an episode of Futurama… It is a cartoon meant for adults made by the same guy who makes the Simpsons. Anyhow, it is an episode where one of the women wishes to marry Bender, who is a robot. “Support Robosexual Marriage” was the theme of the episode. I can’t imagine anybody actually arguing for it, though. 🙂
 
50 years ago who actually thought we’d have to endure discussions of homosexual marriage?

40 years ago?
20?
 
Adamski said:
Last night when flipping the channels I came upon a show that was promoting the idea of robot marriage for (not kidding)

They where using the president for gay marriage to push thier ideas and said there are 1000’s of men wanting to marry robots in the US right now and 2 companies are working and life like women robots.
Click to expand...
Don’t be a hater. Robots deserve equality. Why do we think we are better than they are? Let’s stop the oppression and bigotry now.
 
This really could become reality …

I was also reading about how science in the united states where couples do invetro fertilization and then they have multiple embryos which they use or sex selection

So nothing is far fetched
 
fix said:
Don’t be a hater. Robots deserve equality. Why do we think we are better than they are? Let’s stop the oppression and bigotry now.
Click to expand...
:bigyikes::rotfl::rotfl::whacky:

Lol I was thinking the same thing! 😃
 
Anything to justify Sin.

First we justify murder (Abortion)
Now we justify same sex, sex… (Called Gay Marriage)
What’s next?? Don’t answer, the list is longer then the ocean is deep.

When you take God out of society, schools, etc. this is what you end up with…
 
Adamski said:
Last night when flipping the channels I came upon a show that was promoting the idea of robot marriage for (not kidding)

They where using the president for gay marriage to push thier ideas and said there are 1000’s of men wanting to marry robots in the US right now and 2 companies are working and life like women robots.
Click to expand...
And once this kicks off they’ll start doing furries too… and I will be hiding in my basement…
 
Robots are not conscious. They cannot love etc. Regardless of one’s views on gay marriage, * the analogy with marrying robots is invalid and shows a basic misunderstanding of logic.
  • Unless one holds the absurd position that gays cannot love or be loved.
 
wittgenstein said:
Robots are not conscious. They cannot love etc. Regardless of one’s views on gay marriage, * the analogy with marrying robots is invalid and shows a basic misunderstanding of logic.
  • Unless one holds the absurd position that gays cannot love or be loved.
Click to expand...
If you think two men can “marry” that fails the logic test.
 
Response to post 11
Read post 10 again.I took no position (pro or con) as to gay marriage. My only point was that the analogy of marrying robots is silly and shows a lack of basic logic skills.
Even if I agree with a person’s position and they make a moronic argument, I will still point out that their “argument” is moronic.
Yep, I’m old school, the truth is more important to me then winning.
 
wittgenstein said:
Robots are not conscious. They cannot love etc. Regardless of one’s views on gay marriage, * the analogy with marrying robots is invalid and shows a basic misunderstanding of logic.
Click to expand...
Not really. The analogy simply illustrates how abnormal homosexuality is on a technical level.
 
wittgenstein said:
Robots are not conscious. They cannot love etc. Regardless of one’s views on gay marriage, * the analogy with marrying robots is invalid and shows a basic misunderstanding of logic.
  • Unless one holds the absurd position that gays cannot love or be loved.
Click to expand...
What’s love got to do with it?
 
wittgenstein said:
Response to post 11
Read post 10 again.I took no position (pro or con) as to gay marriage. My only point was that the analogy of marrying robots is silly and shows a lack of basic logic skills.
Even if I agree with a person’s position and they make a moronic argument, I will still point out that their “argument” is moronic.
Yep, I’m old school, the truth is more important to me then winning.
Click to expand...
Robot marriage is no more illogical than “gay” marriage. Both are impossible and honestly I have used the analogy of robotics before in arguing against faux marriage. Once one artificially defines marriage there are no boundaries.
 
Response to post 15
Really!!!. Tell my wife (Peggy,as if its any of your business ) that love has nothing to do with marriage!
 
wittgenstein said:
Response to post 15
Really!!!. Tell my wife (Peggy,as if its any of your business ) that love has nothing to do with marriage!
Click to expand...
Love has a great deal to do with marriage…but it is far from the only consideration. For one thing, potential marriage partners must be compatible on a biological level. An illicit, unnatural, and unholy amour between two people—be it an adult and a juvenile, or persons of the same gender—is morally berift, biologically unfruitful, and just all-around lousy.
 
There are different types of love. My love for my wife is different then my love for my daughter (a juvenile ). I am sure that most gay men would agree that if a gay man married a gay juvenile,that is WRONG. I and my wife have gay friends. None are child molesters,or even have an interest in such things.
My attitude is that I hate liver and refuse to eat it. However, if someone loves liver I do not think of him as a moral degenerate. Similarly, I am disgusted by the thought of me kissing a guy. But if someones else likes it…its really none of my business.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top