Maria,
I was first exposed to the LC by the guiding hand of my mother. I met Father Kermit, a very well-rounded, holy, and in many ways typical LC, who inspired me a great deal. Since then I have enjoyed many opportunities to be exposed to their spirituality, their formation practices, and the boys, brothers, and priests from all stages of progression toward their vocation.
Never have I ever met an LC whom I found to be poorly rounded. They bring to the order their particular talents, and are in no way forced to stay. In fact, one thing that the “recruiter” (the priest who’s job it is to talk to those who are interested in joining) will say to someone who is interested (as I was at a few points in my life) is that the schools are primarily a place of discernment, and, if you feel that God is calling you elsewhere you will be encouraged to leave (or finish your year of studies then leave) to persue that call. Also, they will tell you that if they feel that you are either not sutable for the priesthood, your charism is more suitable for another order or diocesan work, they will suggest leaving to persue the appropriate route to find your place to maximize your ability and reap the benefits of your particular charism.
The life of an LC is not easy. They do have a rigorous schedule. Discipline is very important to their formation process… a process which takes 12 years if I’m not mistaken. I can see how someone who does not share the LC charism could misunderstand the reasons for the LC being the way that it is, but in no way is a scary picture of the LC as a controlling, overly strict, or discompassionate assessment of the order warranted.
As to the usefulness of the opinions of x-LCs in determining the quality/character of the order, I’d say it is negligible. Instead, I would look to the experiences of those who are in no way bias against them. Would you ask an x-Catholic for an opinion on the validity of the Catholic Faith and expect an answer that would be useful in understanding the character of the Catholic Church?
I plan on going to the annual spring retreat that the LC put on in Connecticut next Easter. I have found it to be one of my most moving and beneficial experiences in my faith life.
Do I believe that there may be some reason for people to be put-off by the Legionaries? Yes, I suppose that there may be. However, I do not believe that it is a problem with the LC… rather, I believe that those people have experienced a true difference between their own charism and that of the charism of the LC. How they react to this difference reflects more their character than that of the LC.
The Church is dynamic. Different orders fulfill different roles in the task of evangelization. The LC role is very unique, and without experiencing the joy of complete self-giving that the LC brothers and priests exhibit it would be hard for anyone to understand it.
As to the relationship between the pope and the LC, perhaps this will help:
The pope thanked the Legionaries and Regnum Christi members for the loyalty they have shown to the church and to the pontiff. Their style of apostolate, he said, rightly reflects the need to proclaim Gospel truths fearlessly, “with intellectual depth and with courage.”
In a letter posted on the Legionaries’ Web site, the pope congratulated Fr Maciel for 60 years of “intense, generous and fruitful priestly ministry.” The pope said he wanted to join in the “canticle of praise and thanksgiving” for the great things the priest has accomplished and said Father Maciel has always been concerned with the “integral promotion of the person.” (
CathNews)
The best way to find out about the LC is to spend time with them. No amount of talking, or reading, (and most definitely
not) or visiting anti-LC websites, will ever give you a good picture of who and what they are.
God bless,
Agricola