Legionaries of Christ

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually, my brother decided to go on retreat with Fr. Groeschel’s group next week. Please keep him in you rprayers.

I guess one thing I have been pondering of late is the vocation issue ExLegionary brought up. Before entering the Legion, I really did think my brother had a vocation. There were definite signs, he was exploring his options, and got “sucked-in” so to speak by the idealism and total surrender aspescts of the Legion when he went for a weekend. He can look back now, and see that many of their tactics were heavy handed and geared towards recruitment rather than discernment. But he too feels like ExLegionary that his vocation was to the Legion and he can’t imagine being a priest in any other capacity. But the problem with that is, why would God call you to serve Him in an organization that is so flawed, knowing the havoc it would wreak on your faith and psyche? I just have to think that God’s calling was to the priesthood, and the Legion got in the way.
 
We have to make a gentle distinction between a call to the religious life and a call to the priesthood. The call to the religious life is very specific. God calls us to live the Gospel according to a charism that is very specific. Franciscans are not Legionaries and Legionaries are not Jesuits and so forth. That’s one call.

The call to the priesthood is universal. The priesthood is not part of the religious life. It is not even necessary for the religious life and in reverse. The religious life is not necessary for the priesthood. A priest can be a seular man. That’s why we have diocesan priests, societies of priests and fraternities of priests. These are secular men. They are not consecrated religious. A Maryknoll, FSSP or a Vincentian is no more a religious than a diocesan priest. They are all secular men who are priests. God calls a priest to enter into the priesthood of Jeus Christ, not into the Franciscans or the Dominicans, etc.

Religious men who are priests were called by Christ to enter into a covenant with him within a religious family that is very specific. It lives a very specific life and is guided by a very specific rule. Their way of life is governed by their community, not by their priesthood. As far as their priesthood is concerned, there is no difference between them and any other priest. What makes them different is their religious life. The way that they live the Gospel. That’s why religious communities consider the priesthood to be a call inside another call.

Christ calls a religious man to enter the universal priesthood of Jesus Christ, while at the same time remaining within his religious family living the Gospel according to the gifts of that family. What they do as priests is the same as other priests. How they live day to day is very different from other people, because they are religious, not because they are priests.

This is why a man who is a priest separates his priestly vocation from his religious vocation. They are two vocations. When you blend them, in your mind, then you have clouded the waters. This is where we get into tat craziness where we begin to use such language as Franciscan priests, Jesuit priests, Dominican priess, etc. There are not such priests. There are priests who are Franciscans, Dominicans, Jesuits and secular. All of them share the same priesthood of Jesus Christ, but they do not share the same way of living the Gospel. Each has been called to live the Gospel according to a different gift or religious charism. It makes no difference to Christ or the religious community if they are ordained or not, as long as they have the call to live that charism.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
IMHO

When i bombed out of the Legion of Christ i did not know where to turn.
Interesting choice of words. Do you still view your leaving the Legion as a failure? I would think that it was in some sense a victory of your maturing and being able to discern the evil in Fr. Maciel. He had many people fooled, young, old, rich, poor, Cardinals, even Popes. He took advantage of the idealism of youth, and abused those entrusted to his care for his own purposes.
 
Interesting choice of words. Do you still view your leaving the Legion as a failure? I would think that it was in some sense a victory of your maturing and being able to discern the evil in Fr. Maciel. He had many people fooled, young, old, rich, poor, Cardinals, even Popes. He took advantage of the idealism of youth, and abused those entrusted to his care for his own purposes.
We also have to be careful here. The fact that Fr. Marciel committed some serious sins, does not reflect on the current members of the congregation. We’re still waiting for the final verdict on the congregation.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
I never meant to infer anything against any other members of the Legionaries. Every other Legionary I have ever met has seemed to be an exemplary priest, and it is very sad and puzzling that Maciel was so successful in building this organization considering his own personal corruption.

However, there also seem to be many flaws in the configuration of the organization, and in many ways they have not properly looked after the human needs of their members. I have one brother who came home from the Legionaries after 2 years with a severe mental breakdown, and now this brother. And I am now privy to some of his stories of what has been happening there… I am also in the middle of reading the book written by ExLegionary about his experiences during some 23 years in the organization, and it’s all starting to make some sense.

My personal but somewhat educated opinion is that Maciel had a deep-seated need to control and dominate other people. Hence, the sexual abuse of young men and boys, his affair with and impregnation of a much younger woman, and his isolation and manipulation of new young members of the Legionaries. He was building his own personal kingdom, over which he had total control. I’m sure he had some good motivations and charitable impulses, but they were overwhelmed by his need for power.

The main problem now that Maciel has passed away, is that the organization seems to see little need to make reforms and to win back the trust and loyalty of it’s members and supporters. Maybe they’re waiting for the results of the current Visitation, but it would seem to me that the resignation/replacement of the current top leadership would go a long way towards restoring that trust. I find it hard to believe that they had no idea what was going on, or at least that their failure to know indicates serious incompetence. And maybe they were also victims of this man’s fraud and manipulation. If so, then all the more reason to find a way to bring in some fresh, new leadership untainted by the scandal.
 
I never meant to infer anything against any other members of the Legionaries. Every other Legionary I have ever met has seemed to be an exemplary priest, and it is very sad and puzzling that Maciel was so successful in building this organization considering his own personal corruption.

However, there also seem to be many flaws in the configuration of the organization, and in many ways they have not properly looked after the human needs of their members. I have one brother who came home from the Legionaries after 2 years with a severe mental breakdown, and now this brother. And I am now privy to some of his stories of what has been happening there… I am also in the middle of reading the book written by ExLegionary about his experiences during some 23 years in the organization, and it’s all starting to make some sense.

My personal but somewhat educated opinion is that Maciel had a deep-seated need to control and dominate other people. Hence, the sexual abuse of young men and boys, his affair with and impregnation of a much younger woman, and his isolation and manipulation of new young members of the Legionaries. He was building his own personal kingdom, over which he had total control. I’m sure he had some good motivations and charitable impulses, but they were overwhelmed by his need for power.

The main problem now that Maciel has passed away, is that the organization seems to see little need to make reforms and to win back the trust and loyalty of it’s members and supporters. Maybe they’re waiting for the results of the current Visitation, but it would seem to me that the resignation/replacement of the current top leadership would go a long way towards restoring that trust. I find it hard to believe that they had no idea what was going on, or at least that their failure to know indicates serious incompetence. And maybe they were also victims of this man’s fraud and manipulation. If so, then all the more reason to find a way to bring in some fresh, new leadership untainted by the scandal.
I’m not privy to any private discussions, but I would bet that much of what you’re saying is of concern to the Vatican.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Actually, my brother decided to go on retreat with Fr. Groeschel’s group next week. Please keep him in you rprayers.

But the problem with that is, why would God call you to serve Him in an organization that is so flawed, knowing the havoc it would wreak on your faith and psyche? I just have to think that God’s calling was to the priesthood, and the Legion got in the way.
jacie,
this is a great discussion!

jacie,

1] with all due respect for Fr Groeschel…a champion of the Legionaries of Christ and Fr. Maciel for the longest time…

2] I do believe there is a mystery involved in your deep question and insight. I can be radical:
the question could also be: Does God call anyone to the Legion of Christ, or does the Legion of Christ simply call people to itself [in a kind of Narcissistic way]? What if the Legion of Christ is not God’s work but rather the work of a Pedophile Narcissist Psychopath?
 
Bro JR,
great thinking!

But could that distinction be more in the abstract than in reality and the distinction gets blurred?

One is called to the Religious Community… in the case of the LC/RC…there appears to be a fundamental call to the Regnum Christi Movement either in its lay or priestly dimension… this would be similar to the call to the Franciscan Order in its various dimensions…it is also closely bound to the spirit and charism of the Founder… The Legion and Regnum were also closely bound to Fr. Maciel, his saintliness, etc.

As a member of the Legion/Regnum Movement, one’s religioius superior/spiritual director
…in the Movement it’s all the same!.. invites/promotes one to the priesthood…So a member might go for the priesthood because his superior/director suggests, tells…

This is probably totally assways. But that is the way it has been for decades in the Legion/Regnum

Example: Fr. Alvaro Corcuera joined the Movement as a lay member and became a consecrated lay member of the Regnum Christi [called 3rd Degree Regnum Christi] and lived in a community of other laymen…for years. Then Fr. Maciel invited him to the priesthood and after some years training he was ordained a priest. So apparently his vocation “changed”…
We have to make a gentle distinction between a call to the religious life and a call to the priesthood. The call to the religious life is very specific. God calls us to live the Gospel according to a charism that is very specific. Franciscans are not Legionaries and Legionaries are not Jesuits and so forth. That’s one call.

The call to the priesthood is universal. The priesthood is not part of the religious life. It is not even necessary for the religious life and in reverse. The religious life is not necessary for the priesthood.
 
Dear Charitas,
I know there is a Miles Jesu which is being investigated by the Vatican and well nigh disbanded.
No, not Miles Jesu, but Miles Christi.

If Miles Jesu is being investigated by the Vatican…then I would have to say
(forgive me before hand for this)

they are “Miles” apart!

The website for the Miles Christi Religious Order is www.mileschristi.org

They are a religious order of Priests and Brothers devoted to the pursuit of sanctity, for the greater glory of God. Their mission is the sanctification of the laity, particularly of college students.

The Canons Regular of St. John Cantius are a community, this from their website.
Their website is filled with information and they have many resources for priests and laity alike.

"Admission to the Canons Regular of St. John Cantius

Admission to the Canons Regular of St. John Cantius is open to Catholic men who have expressed a desire to lead a life based upon the Rule of Saint Augustine and in accordance with the Constititions of the Canons Regular of St. John Cantius."

On a spectrum of vocation these two seem to be (ahem, again, pardon) “Miles” apart.
The Religious Order of Miles Christi traveling abroad and the Canons Regular of St. John Cantius a community serving a variety of functions within the location of a parish in Chicago.

If any of this has been of any worth to you then, Deo Gratias!
If not, pardon and forgiveness.

a Mary,
 
Are they brothers, or full-fledged priests? Would they be open to a priest transferring from the Legionaries? I would love to send my brother for a visit, but right now he can’t imagine himself falling in love with another order the way he felt about the Legionaries. Please pray for him.
Is there something wrong with the Legionaries? If he loves the Legionaires, he shoud stay. He doesn’t have to leave them.
 
I read an blurb by the Archbishop of Miami, Bishop John Favalora. The Legion is no longer allowed to minister in that diocese. But it gave no reason. Not that a bishop needs a reason to forbid a community from functioning in his diocese, but is this going on elsewhere? Are they being disinvited in other dioceses? This was on a blog, but no more information.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Is there something wrong with the Legionaries? If he loves the Legionaires, he shoud stay. He doesn’t have to leave them.
Yes, there is much wrong with the Legionaries, unfortunately. There is also much good, but it is difficult to say that they will be able to save it.

The Legion calls young men to live a life of poverty, chastity, obedience and charity, and to give total devotion to Christ and also to the Legion. This sort of total self-giving is very attractive to the devout idealist, and is a good thing in the right hands. The problem is that Fr. Maciel, the founder and in total control up until just a few years ago, used this ideal of orthodoxy and total self-giving to attract and then control the membership in an abusive and selfilsh way, The organization has so much promise, mostly because of the type of wonderful people it has attracted, but many eventually figure out as they mature that Fr. Maciel’s ultimate ends were the accumulation of wealth and power for himself.

This sounds rather harsh, but is more and more apparently the truth. The young men in the Legion are taught that they must refrain from developing any close friendships with their classmates, are cut off from contact with family and friends for a number of years after joining, and are rarely allowed to venture out on their own where they are not under the constant supervision of their superiors. To some extent, this can be understood as part of the total self-giving and committment to Christ that they desire, and not necessarily lbad in itself, but in reality it was too often used to keep “recruits” under wraps and part of the organization with little regard to whether they really had a vocation or not. It probably greatly contributed to the explosive growth of the organization. One example of their misuse of their recruits for their own purposes not in keeping with the best interests of the recruit himself or the truth in general is the fact that the Legionaries ordained several classes of “seminarians” (or Candidates) after the leadership supposedly discovered and confirmed Maciel’s infidelity and embezzlement of funds, without breathing a word of it to those being ordained. Was this fair? Should they have not had the opportunity to know these facts before taking solemn vows?

I would liken it to an abusive and controlling husband. The behavior is so similar: First, you target a younger, sweet-natured, naive woman, turn on the charm and convince her that you are going to look after her and take care of her for the rest of her life, then you isolate her from her friends and family and convince her that you are all she needs, then you create an environment for her that keeps her away from contact with anyone who might influence her to think or act independently of you, then you can soon do anything you want to her because she is totally dependent on you and you have become all she knows. She becomes ashamed of her situation, and so is relucltant to reach out to anyone for help and admit failure, and she only leaves if the abuse somehow becomes bad enough that she can no longer bear it.

My brother is upset because so many of the remaining Legionaries don’t seem to want to admit to themselves the gravity of Maciel’s actions. They still want to honor him and hang his pictures on their walls. They don’t know anything else, and haven’t the maturity to understand what he was really all about. And many of those who dare to speak out are marginalized and ostracized by the organization. The organization seems to be circling the wagons and trying to maintain the status quo instead of instituting any real reform. But of course if they were all raised and trained in the Legion, how would they know any different?

I know many may think this discussion uncharitable, as I might once have, but I have come to the realization that abusers too often use the charitable impulses of good people to provide cover for their actions, and it’s time for the truth to come out. I hope and pray this organization can be saved and reformed properly to be what it should have been from the beginning. They are losing many good and holy priests. Unfortunately, many of them could and would have become successful and lifelong priests in other orders or congregations, but their experience with the Legionaries may have irretrievably destroyed their vocation. What I see in my brother since he’s been home corresponds with someone who has been through hell and back. There is a level of post-traumitization (PTSD, if you will) evident, and he is reveling in being in touch with family and friends and the outside world in general after a seemingly long drought… Now I would be the first to agree that I admire any Order or Congregation that demands total dedication and integrity from it’s members, But I would then expect that organization to act in a charitable and Christian manner in its dealings with its members and with others. It unfortunately appears that the Legionaries have not.
 
Bro JR,
great thinking!

But could that distinction be more in the abstract than in reality and the distinction gets blurred?

One is called to the Religious Community… in the case of the LC/RC…there appears to be a fundamental call to the Regnum Christi Movement either in its lay or priestly dimension… this would be similar to the call to the Franciscan Order in its various dimensions…it is also closely bound to the spirit and charism of the Founder… The Legion and Regnum were also closely bound to Fr. Maciel, his saintliness, etc.

As a member of the Legion/Regnum Movement, one’s religioius superior/spiritual director
…in the Movement it’s all the same!.. invites/promotes one to the priesthood…So a member might go for the priesthood because his superior/director suggests, tells…

This is probably totally assways. But that is the way it has been for decades in the Legion/Regnum

Example: Fr. Alvaro Corcuera joined the Movement as a lay member and became a consecrated lay member of the Regnum Christi [called 3rd Degree Regnum Christi] and lived in a community of other laymen…for years. Then Fr. Maciel invited him to the priesthood and after some years training he was ordained a priest. So apparently his vocation “changed”…
We have to make a gentle distinction between a call to the religious life and a call to the priesthood. The call to the religious life is very specific. God calls us to live the Gospel according to a charism that is very specific. Franciscans are not Legionaries and Legionaries are not Jesuits and so forth. That’s one call.

The call to the priesthood is universal. The priesthood is not part of the religious life. It is not even necessary for the religious life and in reverse. The religious life is not necessary for the priesthood.
There are communities that are clerical communities. This means that all of their members or the majority must be priests. But this does not mean that one is called to be a “Blank” Priest. One is called to be a priest. One can be called to be a priest within a specific spiritual family. That can be an order, a congregation, a society, a fraternity, a secular order, or an institute. For example, those who join the Canons of St. Jon Cantius are called to be priests within the Augustinian family as a Canon of St. John Cantius. It’s almost like a funnel. The priest is called to serve within a very specific context. But the priesthood does not belong to the context. It belongs to the universal Church. However, the priest is called to exercise the Churh’s priestly mission within that context. That’s why a religious can leave his community and remain a priest. Many who do, join a diocese. It is important to keep the distinction between the priesthood and vocation to a particular way of life very clear, in fact, not just in theory.

I believe that the old orders (Carthusians, Benedictines and Francsicans) have done a very good job at keeping the distinction alive. When you enter their houses you can tell that they are what they say they are: monks and friars, not priests. You can’t tell if an individual is a priest or not. Their habits, rights, duties, work, prayer life, titles, mission, and even their roles in the community are the same for all. You can only see the priest when it’s time for the sacraments. In their rule and their constitution the word priest is not mentioned. Their priests follow the same rules as do diocesan priests. The founders were not concerned about the priesthood. They were concerned about the sanctification of the brothers and through them the Church. They were very ecclesial, not priestly.

The newer orders and congregations were the ones who introduced into the Church the idea of consecrated priests. They were founded for priests who wanted a consecrated life. Then in the 20th century we see the foundation of societies, fraternities and secular institutes for priests who do not want the consecrated life, but do want the community support in their ministry.

What we see over the centuries is the Holy Spirit gifting his Church with different arenas where priests can be sanctified and supported. That’s why may abbeys and religious orders are now fighting the laity tooth and nail on this issue of priests. They don’t want to lose their religious charism by focussing on the priesthood of some of their members. In some places it has become a battle between religious orders vs the laity. The laity wants more priests. The orders want more religious. The laity wants priests to run parishes and do what priests have done in the past. The orders want religious to BE what they were founded to be, members of a community first and foremost and ministers to the laity second. I believe that in those places where this tug of war is taking place there is a need for education. The average Catholic does not know what it means to be a consecrated relgious. This was much clearer 150 years ago than it is today. The fault lies with bishops and religious orders.

Bishops asked religious orders to take over priestly duties in their dioceses because of a shortage of priests. Religious agreed. But with the passage of time, religious became so involved in priestly duties that they began to live and look like diocesan priests.

Now, we have the John Paul Generation. This is the generaton of younger religious who want to go back to their roots Mendicants want to be mendicants, not parish priests. Monks want to be cloistered. Friars want to be brothers and so forth. But the average person in the pew has not had the benefit of an explanation. It’s no wonder that people get confused and when they get confused, they become angry.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Yes, JREducation, I believe that the University of Steubenville has prohibited the Legionaries from operating on its campus. There are also a number of schools that have fractured after being taken over by the Legionaries, with parents complaining that the organization was more interested in recruiting members than it was in serving the students and families. I’m sure this doesn’t always happen when the Legionaries move in, but probably depends on the particular leaders involved. But it does seem to be a pattern. The excuse has always been that they are hated and feared because of their orthodoxy, but sadly I think it is much more than that.
 
Yes, there is much wrong with the Legionaries, unfortunately. There is also much good, but it is difficult to say that they will be able to save it.

The Legion calls young men to live a life of poverty, chastity, obedience and charity, and to give total devotion to Christ and also to the Legion. This sort of total self-giving is very attractive to the devout idealist, and is a good thing in the right hands. The problem is that Fr. Maciel, the founder and in total control up until just a few years ago, used this ideal of orthodoxy and total self-giving to attract and then control the membership in an abusive and selfilsh way, The organization has so much promise, mostly because of the type of wonderful people it has attracted, but many eventually figure out as they mature that Fr. Maciel’s ultimate ends were the accumulation of wealth and power for himself.

This sounds rather harsh, but is more and more apparently the truth. The young men in the Legion are taught that they must refrain from developing any close friendships with their classmates, are cut off from contact with family and friends for a number of years after joining, and are rarely allowed to venture out on their own where they are not under the constant supervision of their superiors. To some extent, this can be understood as part of the total self-giving and committment to Christ that they desire, and not necessarily lbad in itself, but in reality it was too often used to keep “recruits” under wraps and part of the organization with little regard to whether they really had a vocation or not. It probably greatly contributed to the explosive growth of the organization. One example of their misuse of their recruits for their own purposes not in keeping with the best interests of the recruit himself or the truth in general is the fact that the Legionaries ordained several classes of “seminarians” (or Candidates) after the leadership supposedly discovered and confirmed Maciel’s infidelity and embezzlement of funds, without breathing a word of it to those being ordained. Was this fair? Should they have not had the opportunity to know these facts before taking solemn vows?

CUT HERE FOR LACK OF SPACE

I know many may think this discussion uncharitable, as I might once have, but I have come to the realization that abusers too often use the charitable impulses of good people to provide cover for their actions, and it’s time for the truth to come out. I hope and pray this organization can be saved and reformed properly to be what it should have been from the beginning. They are losing many good and holy priests. Unfortunately, many of them could and would have become successful and lifelong priests in other orders or congregations, but their experience with the Legionaries may have irretrievably destroyed their vocation. What I see in my brother since he’s been home corresponds with someone who has been through hell and back. There is a level of post-traumitization (PTSD, if you will) evident, and he is reveling in being in touch with family and friends and the outside world in general after a seemingly long drought… Now I would be the first to agree that I admire any Order or Congregation that demands total dedication and integrity from it’s members, But I would then expect that organization to act in a charitable and Christian manner in its dealings with its members and with others. It unfortunately appears that the Legionaries have not.
I’d like to make two observations here, just to help other readers. In many religious communities, mostly in orders, there is such a thing as enclosure. For example, Carthusians have very little contact with the outside world. Some Carthusians go decades without seeing anyone who is not a Carthusian. But the idea here is not to shield someone from the world for the sole purpose of control. The idea here is that the individual hermit wants to separate from the world and the Carthusian monastery offers him a sacred space where he can do this. There is no control from the superior or the community. The superior himself is a hermit and has little or no contact with the outside world, not even with the outside Church. They deliberately keep contact to a minimum, whatever is necessary for their spiritual and material growth.

There are also orders that are founded around the charism of theri founder such as Benedictines, Franciscans, Missionaries of Charity, Dominicans, Discalced Carmelites, and Jesuits. In these communnities, the founders, even though they are dead, continue to influence their members. But they influence their members by their lives and their holiness. These founders were leaders and protectors of their bretheren. They were the first to be out there on the front lines doing whatever it is that the order does. They spent their lives as models for their spiritual sons or daughters. In reality, they did not ask their sons or daughters to look to them. These founders always pointed to Christ. They commanded obedience in conforming to Christ, not to themselves. The reason that they are put on a pedastal and their preseence is still strongly felt is because they earned the love and admiration of their spiritual children. Their spiritual children love to imitate them, because as they do so, they find themselves closer to Christ. In essence, the founders serve as teachers on the Christian life. There is an openness to the universal call to holiness. It’s not cultic relationship between the founder and his/her children. Mother Teresa’s Missionaries of Charity love her, because she showed them something better. What did she show them? She showed them Christ, not herself.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Yes, JREducation, I believe that the University of Steubenville has prohibited the Legionaries from operating on its campus. There are also a number of schools that have fractured after being taken over by the Legionaries, with parents complaining that the organization was more interested in recruiting members than it was in serving the students and families. I’m sure this doesn’t always happen when the Legionaries move in, but probably depends on the particular leaders involved. But it does seem to be a pattern. The excuse has always been that they are hated and feared because of their orthodoxy, but sadly I think it is much more than that.
I was wondering about that, because Archbishop Favalora is a very orthodox man. They must have done or not done something for him to say that they can no longer function in his diocese. This is not a bishop who is an extremist. He’s a well balanced man with a lot of experience.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
jacie,
jacie,

1] with all due respect for Fr Groeschel…a champion of the Legionaries of Christ and Fr. Maciel for the longest time…

2] I do believe there is a mystery involved in your deep question and insight. I can be radical:
the question could also be: Does God call anyone to the Legion of Christ, or does the Legion of Christ simply call people to itself [in a kind of Narcissistic way]? What if the Legion of Christ is not God’s work but rather the work of a Pedophile Narcissist Psychopath?
I agree that, taking into account what we now know of Fr. Maciel, the Legionaries were not God’s work, at least not in the beginning. Fr. Maciel did not appear to have good intentions when he formed this organization. That said, it is possible that God did work upon many individuals involved in the organization, and there was much good work done for Christ. Take yourself, for instance. You describe in your book your ministry to the poor peoples of Quintana Roo in Mexico. You started up radio evangelization programs, the School of Faith that trained catechists. Do you not think that God at least had a hand in any of that? Did you not take these actions out of love for Christ?

I think it is also important to consider the spiritual warfare going on here. The devil wanted to destroy Christ. In lieu of that, the next best thing is to destroy priests. I think he has unfortunately had great success with this using Fr. Maciel. This last century was supposedly turned over to the devil to wreak havoc, as Pope Leo’s dream would have us believe. The smoke of Satan has indeed entered the inside depths of the Christ’s Church. What greater victory for Satan than to use Maciel to establish such power and influence with Cardinals and Popes, and lead so many good people astray, much less destroy them. All under the guise of such supposed faithfullness and orthodoxy.

But I have to believe that God always has the upper hand. There is a plan here, When I attended my brother’s ordination in Rome several years ago, I had a very powerful vision of sorts that has stayed with me very intensely. He was ordained along with some 50 other priests on Christmas Eve. The following day, as was customary for the Legion, the new priests were to say their first Masses at St. Peter’s, each at a separate altar or chapel within the very large Basilica, simultaneously. That early Christmas morning, as I was walking up to St. Peter’s Square, busloads of young Legionaries from the local Seminary, all in their black cassocks were being dropped off busload after busload to attend the masses. I watched these hundreds of beautiful, vibrant young men scurrying about, coming from behind the numerous pillars along the Colonnade and bustling their way into the Basilica, and was overwhelmed with a deep interior feeling that I can only say was from the Holy Spirit, that this was God’s holy cavalry coming to the rescue of Holy Mother Church.

I think that there is hope. I think that God is going to turn this whole thing back on Satan and somehow bring forth the most beautiful, lovely group of holy priests that the Church has seen in a very long time. Maciel attracted the best and the brightest, as he was so proud to say. Well, what do you think God can do with that? They’re there, and we have to save them so they can save us.
 
I have been following this thread and would like to add my humble opinion. First that the saying that God writes straight with crooked lines holds much truth. Whatever their founders sins may be. God used it to draw many fervent souls.

As a Former Missionary and now a Carmelite hermit. I have seen very clearly that where The Spirit works so more ardently does the devil try to destroy what is good. Rather than looking at it from only negative terms, maybe we can see that maybe God’s work is being done in many of these young men and that their vocation is now being allowed to be tried by fire. It can either galvanize a vocation if we allow it or we can let it bring us to despair. The choice is ours.

The hermitage is a place of spiritual warfare but it is not exclusive to hermits alone. So, with prayer time and healing your brother can decide if He will be strengthened by the fire or allow it to destroy his vocation. If we look to humans , they will always fall short. If we look to God we find our true selves and His abundant healing and mercy.

Purgations and the Cross are part of any real vocation for it is a call to follow Christ crucified. If we die with Him we shall also be raised with Him. and then as Julian of Norwhich says, “all shall be well and again all manner of things shall be well.”

Please tell your brother I am praying for him and the grace of healing and Holy Perserverence as he walks his own personal way of the cross. May it end for Him in the joy of the resurrection promised to all those who having put their hand to the plow do not look back.

with tender love in Jesus,

O Adonai, an insignificant hermit
 
Favalora had very good reason to ban the LC/RC. They had no permision to operate in the Archdiocese of Miami. Apparently the only permission that had been granted was to certain LC priests (on a case by case basis) to serve their people only. They came to my parish in Miami, started openly recruiting for all their children’s clubs (Challenge, Conquest, Pure Fashion…etc.) They had even set up the main hall at our parish for all the meetings for Pure Fashion for all of Miami. They also attempted to get involved in the school. The parents were very concerned, tried to express their concern to the pastor to no avail, and ended up writing many, many letters to the archdiocese. The pastor (who is relatively new and very sympathetic to the Legion and RC) was the one who invited them in the first place.
 
I read an blurb by the Archbishop of Miami, Bishop John Favalora. The Legion is no longer allowed to minister in that diocese. But it gave no reason. Not that a bishop needs a reason to forbid a community from functioning in his diocese, but is this going on elsewhere? Are they being disinvited in other dioceses? This was on a blog, but no more information.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
In the other dioceses where they have been excluded it is because of communication issues. They refuse to communicate with the diocese on what they are doing. Also the dioceses raised questions about their vocations “recruiting” with teens with out seeking diocese or parental approval.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top