Legislator Attacks Pro-Life Women as "Men With Breasts"

  • Thread starter Thread starter juliee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
LilyM said:
Not really, any more than asking a devout Mormon who made Joseph Smith’s gold plates.

Given that the objects are believed to be of supernatural origin by Catholics and Mormons respectively, there is no way the provenance of either, if they were man-made, would be recorded or discoverable. It seems inherently UNreasonable to me to ask a question the answer to which is unknowable.
Click to expand...
But Ms. Clinton’s question *was *answered and truthfully, too. The answer given to her was “God!”
 
AngryAtheist8 said:
She should be jailed for mocking her political opponents?:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
No, but it goes to show you the stupidity that passes as education in our government schools today. When the leftists have an absurd position to argue, all these scholars can do is flail about with invective. Now, if there weren't enough of them to actually ELECT a dunce like Josephs, they might be mildly amusing. :whacky: Rob
 
LittleSoldier said:
Nah, just apprehended, given a good talking-to and then let go. And probably apprehended by her own supporters and staff who hope she has some sort of political future which she is blowing by saying the silly, nonsensical things she did (although why anyone would want someone who says things like that to have a political future is beyond me).
Code: 
 With that goofball comment, Babble the Rabble just guaranteed her seat for life. If you haven't noticed, Americans aren't getting smarter. Look who's in the White House! :eek: Rob
Click to expand...
 
What next? A “girlie man” wanting to marry a “man with breasts”?
Their fascination and obsession with sex, death, and communism are the prime movers of the Left’s dementia.
 
sedonaman said:
What next? A “girlie man” wanting to marry a “man with breasts”?
Their fascination and obsession with sex, death, and communism are the prime movers of the Left’s dementia.
Click to expand...
They're out there. :cool:
 
LilyM said:
**Not really, any more than asking a devout Mormon who made Joseph Smith’s gold plates. **
Given that the objects are believed to be of supernatural origin by Catholics and Mormons respectively, there is no way the provenance of either, if they were man-made, would be recorded or discoverable. It seems inherently UNreasonable to me to ask a question the answer to which is unknowable.
Click to expand...
Someone should ask them that.
An area of life shouldn’t be closed off to discussion just because its considered religious.

For instance, Honor Killings are motivated by (or at least justified by) religion.
Does that mean that we don’t have a right to criticize Honor Killings?:rolleyes:
 
AngryAtheist8 said:
Someone should ask them that.
An area of life shouldn’t be closed off to discussion just because its considered religious.

For instance, Honor Killings are motivated by (or at least justified by) religion.
Does that mean that we don’t have a right to criticize Honor Killings?:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Your comment smacks of pomposity. Have you ever read about Christian or Jewish "honor killings"? You atheists love to tar all people of faith with the same bloody brush. :hmmm: Rob
 
Wow it always amazes me that because I’m a woman and pro-life that the pro-aborts think I don’t have a brain. I have become pro-life because I realise that a “fetus” Is a human being and we don’t have the right to decide if they live or die. I came to that conculsion all by my little self, a man didn’t have to tell me.😉
 
bscastro said:
It is just amazing to me how cruel and nasty the opponents to life are.
Click to expand...
There are people who are cruel and nasty on both sides.

While this was offensive, it’s almost laughable at an attempt of an insult. If this is the best the pro-choicers have, keep it coming.
 
LittleSoldier said:
It might surprise you to know that there are many avid pro-lifers that have liberal viewpoints. Some of us look at each issue carefully and, hopefully using our well-formed consciences, decide on a course of action without worrying about whether it is considered liberal or conservative.

I am avidly pro-life. I am also an avid environmentalist. “Modern leftism?” Is that a concept that you have personified to the point where it actually has the capability of “fetishizing the freedom of the human will” and attempting to recast in terms that "can be changed? There is nothing wrong with being liberal when being liberal is the moral, ethical way to be.

In fact, Jesus was quite the liberal when he walked the earth as God Incarnate. IMHO.
Click to expand...
This is the thing. If you ask a liberal if the haves should help the truly needy, he will say yes. If you ask a Catholic, he will say yes. If you ask a conservative, he will say yes.

So, the fact that you agree with liberals here and there does not mean you are a liberal, just as the fact that you agree with Protestants that God is Triune doesn’t make you a Protestant. It just means that the liberals have some good ideas mixed in with the bad ideas. The liberals want to be sure that the material needs of the poor are met; not a bad idea! One is reminded of Someone Who mentioned helping the poor!

But the liberals also think that abortion is all right (yes, yes, I know there are a few liberals out there who do not support ligalized abortion, but it’s on the Democrats" platform), and that is a *bad *idea.

When we pull apart pure liberal thinking, the reason is supports helping the poor is not the same reason that Christ wanted to help the poor. Thus, the fact that you or Christ or any reasonable person agrees with the liberals here or there does not mean that you or Christ or any reasonable person is liberal. The outward similarity of proposals is mere coincidence.
 
St_Francis said:
This is the thing. If you ask a liberal if the haves should help the truly needy, he will say yes. If you ask a Catholic, he will say yes. If you ask a conservative, he will say yes.

So, the fact that you agree with liberals here and there does not mean you are a liberal, just as the fact that you agree with Protestants that God is Triune doesn’t make you a Protestant. It just means that the liberals have some good ideas mixed in with the bad ideas. The liberals want to be sure that the material needs of the poor are met; not a bad idea! One is reminded of Someone Who mentioned helping the poor!

But the liberals also think that abortion is all right (yes, yes, I know there are a few liberals out there who do not support ligalized abortion, but it’s on the Democrats" platform), and that is a *bad *idea.

When we pull apart pure liberal thinking, the reason is supports helping the poor is not the same reason that Christ wanted to help the poor. Thus, the fact that you or Christ or any reasonable person agrees with the liberals here or there does not mean that you or Christ or any reasonable person is liberal. The outward similarity of proposals is mere coincidence.
Click to expand...
👍 I personally think the outward similarity is due more to semantic gymnastics than to coincidence.
 
RACJ said:
Your comment smacks of pomposity. Have you ever read about Christian or Jewish “honor killings”? You atheists love to tar all people of faith with the same bloody brush. :hmmm: Rob
Click to expand...
I admit that Islam is worse.
But Islam, Judaism, and Christianity are all Abrahamic religions.
Moreover, Christian churches and Jewish groups are perfectly capable of oppressing people too.
 
Originally Posted by St Francis
This is the thing. If you ask a liberal if the haves should help the truly needy, he will say yes. If you ask a Catholic, he will say yes. If you ask a conservative, he will say yes.

So, the fact that you agree with liberals here and there does not mean you are a liberal, just as the fact that you agree with Protestants that God is Triune doesn’t make you a Protestant. It just means that the liberals have some good ideas mixed in with the bad ideas. The liberals want to be sure that the material needs of the poor are met; not a bad idea! One is reminded of Someone Who mentioned helping the poor!

But the liberals also think that abortion is all right (yes, yes, I know there are a few liberals out there who do not support ligalized abortion, but it’s on the Democrats" platform), and that is a bad idea.

When we pull apart pure liberal thinking, the reason is supports helping the poor is not the same reason that Christ wanted to help the poor. Thus, the fact that you or Christ or any reasonable person agrees with the liberals here or there does not mean that you or Christ or any reasonable person is liberal. The outward similarity of proposals is mere coincidence.
sedonaman said:
👍 I personally think the outward similarity is due more to semantic gymnastics than to coincidence.
Click to expand...
I suppose the Christians could be faking their concern;)
 
Some men suffer from Gynecomastia through no fault of their own. I’ve got the condition myself. It’s not very fun when you go out and through your shirt people see protruding man breasts 😦

I don’t think this is very sensitive to people like me 😦

I mean I’m not as hardcore pro-life as Catholics but clearly this lawmaker has stigmatized men with this medical condition as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top