Legislator Feuds w/Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter HagiaSophia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

HagiaSophia

Guest
February 1, 2005
A letter from Colorado’s three highest-ranking Catholics angered a House Democrat on Monday who said she resented “being told how to be a good Catholic.”

Rep. Fran Coleman, a Denver Democrat who said she was raped a few years ago, publicly admonished the Colorado Catholic Conference for its opposition to a bill that would require hospitals to give emergency contraception information to sexual assault victims.

The conference represents Denver Archbishop Charles Chaput, Pueblo Bishop Arthur Tafoya and Colorado Springs Bishop Michael Sheridan.

“I absolutely resent the Catholic Church preaching to me because I represent people of all faiths,” a red-faced Coleman said during debate on the House floor. “I question their ability to continue to be in a tax-exempt status. We don’t need to be preached or read to.”

Despite opposition by anti-abortion Republicans, House Bill 1042 won final passage 46-19 and now moves to the Senate, where it is expected to pass. Gov. Bill Owens, who is Catholic, would not comment Monday on his position on the bill.
Coleman was angered by a letter sent to all House lawmakers and signed by Timothy Dore, executive director of the Colorado Catholic Conference, which represents the three dioceses in the state.

The letter was read aloud on the House floor by Rep. Keith King, R-Colorado Springs, who argued that the bill would force Catholic hospitals to go against their religious beliefs. Dore’s letter said the state has always recognized the rights of hospitals to practice medicine based on their beliefs on “the value of human life at all stages from the moment of conception.”
The bill wouldn’t require hospitals to dispense the so-called morning after pill, but rather adopt protocols to inform sexual assault survivors of the availability of emergency contraception. The hospital may dispense the pills or give a referral on where the woman can get the contraceptives.

The bill also has a “conscience clause” that exempts any health-care worker who objects to giving the information on religious or moral grounds.

rockymountainnews.com/drmn/legislature/article/0,1299,DRMN_37_3513132,00.html
 
Since when are people or organizations not allowed to have opinions or inform their representatives?

This is not a socialistic state no matter what some lawmakers might wish.
 
Typical tactics! Get angry, red-faced, go ballistic, proffer a personal revelation as justification…anything but deal head on with the moral issue. And with so many definitions of “rape” now who knows what really happened to her.
 
40.png
caroljm36:
And with so many definitions of “rape” now who knows what really happened to her.
And may God be with you also!!
 
Just shows you that when you get to the either of the extreme edges of Catholicism, that people think that they are more Catholic than the Pope.:banghead:

PF
 
How could someone actually question what form of rape someone had…as if that needs to be…GRrrrrrrr never mind… more self rightousness around here than righteousness.

I have no problem with info being available for rape victims…I cannot and will not pass judgement on their state of mind after such an ordeal…you can quote Doctrine to me up, down, sideways and whatnot…people in that state of mind should have ALL info available…INCLUDING… a Chaplain to be there to comfort and try to let the victim know what her faith teaches…AS WELL AS the allowable time the church says one CAN take an after rape pill

Also…I could feel that womans anger, but if she isnt a practicing Catholic…what can we expect? I would hope though that she would be happy to have a religion that DOES lay out its teachings on how to be a good catholic…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top