T
TruthfulReign
Guest
What are you using for a Lenten Mass setting, or what is your favorite Lenten Mass setting?
Is this only for Lent? Or all of the liturgical year? Goodness, our organist plays while the schola goes to Holy Communion. Also, we sing the communion antiphons (they’ve been set to music by our director, a very competent composer) and these each include an interlude for piano and cello…AND we started doing these to get AWAY from the absolute dreck that’s typically available for Communion songs.One very important thing to remember is that there is a prohibition against instrumental solos during the Mass. Furthermore, the instruments should be at a minimum and used only to sustain the singing of the faithful.
Liturgical “dance” is also not allowed. Unless you are in a missionary territory where dance is indigenous to the culture of the natives, this kind of activity should not be done in the Western world.[11.] **The Mystery of the Eucharist “is too great for anyone to permit himself to treat it according to his own whim, so that its sacredness and its universal ordering would be obscured”.27 **On the contrary, anyone who acts thus by giving free rein to his own inclinations, even if he is a Priest, injures the substantial unity of the Roman Rite, which ought to be vigorously preserved,28 and becomes responsible for actions that are in no way consistent with the hunger and thirst for the living God that is experienced by the people today. Nor do such actions serve authentic pastoral care or proper liturgical renewal; instead, they deprive Christ’s faithful of their patrimony and their heritage. For arbitrary actions are not conducive to true renewal,29 but are detrimental to the right of Christ’s faithful to a liturgical celebration that is an expression of the Church’s life in accordance with her tradition and discipline. In the end, they introduce elements of distortion and disharmony into the very celebration of the Eucharist, which is oriented in its own lofty way and by its very nature to signifying and wondrously bringing about the communion of divine life and the unity of the People of God.30 The result is uncertainty in matters of doctrine, perplexity and scandal on the part of the People of God, and, almost as a necessary consequence, vigorous opposition, all of which greatly confuse and sadden many of Christ’s faithful in this age of ours when Christian life is often particularly difficult on account of the inroads of “secularization” as well.31
Thus, what you are engaging in, as well-meaning as it may sound, is ilicit and should not be done.The dance has never been made an integral part of the official worship of the Latin Church.
The individual who made this suggestion to your parish at your in-service is not an official with the Church, neither does he have the right to invent a practice and suggest it to others.
- The faithful should stand from the beginning of the Entrance chant, or while the priest approaches the altar, until the end of the Collect
Actually, that is to make the distinction between the time when there is an Entrance Chant and when there isn’t. They have a procession and that IS the priest approaching the altar. You stand for that.Doesn’t “or while the priest approaches the alter” give the priest the authority to kneel on the stairs prior to approaching the alter.
I don’t have a legal degree but I know where you place commas and usage of the words “and” & “or” makes a huge difference.
Standing is the posture proper to the introductory rites. Thus, whoever, is recommending that parishses kneel during the Penitential Rite is going beyond the bounds of what the GIRM states and is inserting his own idiosyncracies here. This is moving into dangerous territory because this violates what the Constitution on Sacred Liturgy states that no one, on his own authority has the right to alter the Mass.Doesn’t “or while the priest approaches the alter” give the priest the authority to kneel on the stairs prior to approaching the alter.
I don’t have a legal degree but I know where you place commas and usage of the words “and” & “or” makes a huge difference.
Is this permissable? Does it fall within the Lenton purpose or should I mention something, or let it be?musical instruments may be played only to give necessary support to the singing. "It would be advisable for those preparing liturgical celebrations to attend to the purpose rather than the strict letter of this law and determine whether certain instrumental pieces may in the local situation indeed foster the spirit of the Lenten season.
Actually, this is not licit. Unfortunately, Lent and Holy Week are hotbeds of experimentation. This is sad.I’ve got a question about what I’m being asked to do at my parish.
Is this permissable? Does it fall within the Lenton purpose or should I mention something, or let it be?
Read below:
"Sunday in Lent, the mass will go as follows…When mass is ready to begin, Fr.will say, from the back, “Good morning/evening”, and
will proceed to invite the assembly to turn to their neighbors and introduce themselves and answer a question that will change from week to week…after a two or three minutes of conversation,
an instrumentalist will begin to play the chords/music to “Be Still”(music also in your mail slot) and the assembly should quiet down.
Then the refrain to “Be Still” is sung by the choir one time.
Then the music is played without singing, and one person confidently speaks the words of Jesus into the mic so that it comes out above the music.
Then the choir sings the refrain to “Be Still” again and so on until the entrance procession is finished.
If you run out of words, just play the refrain instrumentally and then sing the refrain every other time…
This willl take place every Sunday in Lent…"
- “In Lent, the altar should not be decorated with flowers, and musical instruments may be played only to give necessary support to the singing.” [20] This is in order that the penitential character of the season be preserved.
…19. The chants to be sung in celebrations, especially of the Eucharist, and also at devotional exercises should be in harmony with the spirit of the season and the liturgical texts.
From Musicam Sacram:…23. The first Sunday of Lent marks the beginning of the annual lenten observance. [25] In the Mass of this Sunday, there should be some distinctive elements that underline this important moment (e.g., the entrance procession with litanies of the saints).
That sounds like what you are doing. According to the documents, this should not be done. The penitential nature of Lent needs to be respected.
- The playing of these same instruments as solos is not permitted in Advent, Lent, during the Sacred Triduum and in the Offices and Masses of the Dead.
[4.] "Certainly the liturgical reform inaugurated by the Council has greatly contributed to a more conscious, active and fruitful participation in the Holy Sacrifice of the Altar on the part of the faithful."10 Even so, “shadows are not lacking”.11 In this regard it is not possible to be silent about the abuses, even quite grave ones, against the nature of the Liturgy and the Sacraments as well as the tradition and the authority of the Church, which in our day not infrequently plague liturgical celebrations in one ecclesial environment or another. In some places the perpetration of liturgical abuses has become almost habitual, a fact which obviously cannot be allowed and must cease.
[5.] The observance of the norms published by the authority of the Church requires conformity of thought and of word, of external action and of the application of the heart. A merely external observation of norms would obviously be contrary to the nature of the Sacred Liturgy, in which Christ Himself wishes to gather His Church, so that together with Himself she will be “one body and one spirit”.12 For this reason, external action must be illuminated by faith and charity, which unite us with Christ and with one another and engender love for the poor and the abandoned. **The liturgical words and rites, moreover, are a faithful expression, matured over the centuries, of the understanding of Christ, and they teach us to think as He Himself does;13 by conforming our minds to these words, we raise our hearts to the Lord. **All that is said in this Instruction is directed toward such a conformity of our own understanding with that of Christ, as expressed in the words and the rites of the Liturgy.
[6.] For abuses “contribute to the obscuring of the Catholic faith and doctrine concerning this wonderful sacrament”.14 Thus, **they also hinder the faithful from “re-living in a certain way the experience of the two disciples of Emmaus: ‘and their eyes were opened, and they recognized Him’”.**15 For in the presence of God’s power and divinity16 and the splendor of His goodness, made manifest especially in the Sacrament of the Eucharist, it is fitting that all the faithful should have and put into practice that power of acknowledging God’s majesty that they have received through the saving Passion of the Only-Begotten Son.17
[7.] Not infrequently, abuses are rooted in a false understanding of liberty. Yet God has not granted us in Christ an illusory liberty by which we may do what we wish, but a liberty by which we may do that which is fitting and right.18 This is true not only of precepts coming directly from God, but also of laws promulgated by the Church, with appropriate regard for the nature of each norm. For this reason, all should conform to the ordinances set forth by legitimate ecclesiastical authority.
[8.] It is therefore to be noted with great sadness that “ecumenical initiatives which are well-intentioned, nevertheless indulge at times in Eucharistic practices contrary to the discipline by which the Church expresses her faith”. Yet the Eucharist “is too great a gift to tolerate ambiguity or depreciation”. It is therefore necessary that some things be corrected or more clearly delineated so that in this respect as well “the Eucharist will continue to shine forth in all its radiant mystery”.19
Inasmuch as this does not specifically spell things out, such innovations were never envisioned by the Church or else they would have been included in the GIRM and in the other authoritative documents of the Holy See that govern liturgy. As Pope Benedict XVI has said on numerous occasions, the Mass is not something that we “cobble up” for ourselves. We need to receive the norms and rubrics with humility and not try to change things around based on our own idiosyncracies.[9.] Finally, abuses are often based on ignorance, in that they involve a rejection of those elements whose deeper meaning is not understood and whose antiquity is not recognized. For “the liturgical prayers, orations and songs are pervaded by the inspiration and impulse” of the Sacred Scriptures themselves, “and it is from these that the actions and signs receive their meaning”.20 As for the visible signs “which the Sacred Liturgy uses in order to signify the invisible divine realities, they have been chosen by Christ or by the Church”.21 Finally, the structures and forms of the sacred celebrations according to each of the Rites of both East and West are in harmony with the practice of the universal Church also as regards practices received universally from apostolic and unbroken tradition,22 which it is the Church’s task to transmit faithfully and carefully to future generations. All these things are wisely safeguarded and protected by the liturgical norms.