Lesbians getting pregnant

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This made me think, gays and lesbians are more open to live…
 
How did you think they have children?
Well, of course, and the article reeks of an agenda, but it still seems highly odd (if true) that gay and lesbian teens – and specifically the ones secure enough to identify as such, not kids who are still figuring out their sexuality – would be producing significantly more pregnancies than het kids. Unless gay kids are hyperfertile, that implies they’re having more hetero sex than the kids who actually enjoy that sort of thing. Is that not weird?
 
With science of conception outside the womb
and Invitro Fertilization, it is definitely possible
to have babies w/o heterosexual sex.
Also, w/ the wide acceptance of same-sex
marriages, they would want to have children
to make it SEEM like a normal family.
 
"One thing you would think lesbians wouldn’t have to deal with is pregnancy. Seems like a solid assumption, right? Not so much. "

Why Are Lesbian Teens Having Two To Seven Times As Many Babies As Their Heterosexual Peers?
In the 70’s 80’s there was disgraceful cartoon mocking the radical-feminist lesbians which depicted a (man-hating) woman and hir partner who had undergone artificial fertility treatment for the sole purpose of being able to achieve that pinnacle of wimmin’s liberation - the right to have an abortion. :eek:
 
Nowadays the LGBTQ lobby love the traditional institution of ‘marriage’ and ‘family’ a lot more than their trailblazing 70’s and 80’s counterparts.

…gender specific toilets? Not so much!
 
Serious question for catholics who think lesbians should be able to artificially and deliberately deprive a child of a gender-balanced nuclear family - how exactly can the child of two gay or lesbian adoptive ‘parents’ keep the 5th Commandment?
 
Serious question for catholics who think lesbians should be able to artificially and deliberately deprive a child of a gender-balanced nuclear family - how exactly can the child of two gay or lesbian adoptive ‘parents’ keep the 5th Commandment?
Are you serious? Plenty of people are brought up by just one parent, and they manage it. I don’t think the commandment requires that you have both.

Also, by Catholic numbering the Fifth Commandment is “Thou shalt not kill,” so your post is unintentionally amusing.
 
Are you serious?
Are you?
Let’s keep asking each other that…you know…like we’re having a ‘serious’ discussion. :rolleyes:
…Plenty of people are brought up by just one parent, and they manage it.
I said “deliberately deprive”. Not orphans.
Who are you talking about?
…I don’t think the commandment requires that you have both.
It says mother AND father.
I’m pretty sure God means what He says.
…Also, by Catholic numbering the Fifth Commandment is “Thou shalt not kill,” so your post is unintentionally amusing.
You want to quibble about which came first Exodus or Deuteronomy?
You think it’s ‘amusing’ that a child is sold by their surrogate mother to gay adoptive parents?

The irony is on YOU!
Because it’s no coincidence that abortion-on-demand (thou shalt not kill unborn babies) and gay surrogacy (which violates the fifth Commandment) are BOTH against Gods moral law.
YFF!
 
Homosexuals are hypersexual! I’d be shocked except I know what everyone else knew before politics made saying it heresy.
 
With science of conception outside the womb
and Invitro Fertilization, it is definitely possible
to have babies w/o heterosexual sex.
Also, w/ the wide acceptance of same-sex
marriages, they would want to have children
to make it SEEM like a normal family.
Yes, IVF and artificial means of conception and pregnancy are a separate issue. But the author’s main point was that persons with a stated homosexual orientation seem to be having a lot of heterosexual sex.
 
Yes, IVF and artificial means of conception and pregnancy are a separate issue. But the author’s main point was that persons with a stated homosexual orientation seem to be having a lot of heterosexual sex.
Why do you think the author finds that unusual? Adolescence is a time of physical, social, and emotional changes with pressures from parents, peers, teachers and religion. As well as a marked increase in sex hormones. According to Erik Erikson, appropriate social development in adolescence requires solving the major challenge of ego-identity vs. role diffusion. To resolve this life crisis, adolescents must form an ego-identity, a strong sense of “who I am and what I stand for,” or they may suffer role diffusion (running from activity to activity…)"

It is not possible to know from the graphs when the gay/lesbian teens impregnated/became pregnant. Was it during the time that they were questioning or after they identified themselves as gay or lesbian?
 
The implication drawn by the author is that sexual “orientation” is not a fixed, unchangeable characteristic that it is often assumed to be.
 
The implication drawn by the author is that sexual “orientation” is not a fixed, unchangeable characteristic that it is often assumed to be.
The links the author supplied do not address the fixed or unchangeable characteristics of sexual orientation. They do agree with what is well established about fluidity. What they imply is that sexual orientation, along with drug abuse and lack of education are risk factors in teen pregnancies.

In my former post I pointed out that we don’t know from the graphs when the teens self identified as gay or lesbian. My experience is most gay men start out as questioning or bi-sexual before they self identify as gay.

From the NY High School study the author linked to:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4463368/table/tbl1/

From a national study which is not from the article.

April 2015
Pregnancy Risk Among Bisexual, Lesbian, and Gay Youth:
What Does Research Tell Us?

actforyouth.net/resources/rf/rf_lgb-prg_0415.pdf
To better understand the extent of same-sex behaviors in adolescence, researchers analyzed a large, nationally representative sample of youth age 15-21 who were not married or living with a partner (McCabe et al., 2011). While only 3% of males and 6% of females in the 2002 survey described themselves as “homosexual” or “bisexual,” higher numbers—4% of males and 11% of females—reported that they had engaged in same-sex activity. Clearly, describing oneself as either “gay/lesbian” or “heterosexual” does not necessarily rule out bisexual behavior, especially among young women. A counter-intuitive finding of this study was that females who identified themselves as lesbian or bisexual or who reported same-sex attraction were more likely to engage in sex with males than were females who identified themselves as heterosexual.
Analysis of the 2005 and 2007 New York City Youth Risk Behavior Surveys also found that sexually active girls were more likely than boys to engage in bisexual behaviors (9% vs. 4%, respectively) (Pathela & Schillinger, 2010). Two out of three youth who had same-sex partners also had opposite-sex partners. Perhaps unexpectedly, at least two school-based studies have found that most sexually active students who reported engaging exclusively in same-sex behavior identified themselves as heterosexual (Goodenow et al., 2002; Pathela & Schillinger, 2010).
  • Emphasis added
 
Well, of course, and the article reeks of an agenda, but it still seems highly odd (if true) that gay and lesbian teens – and specifically the ones secure enough to identify as such, not kids who are still figuring out their sexuality – would be producing significantly more pregnancies than het kids. Unless gay kids are hyperfertile, that implies they’re having more hetero sex than the kids who actually enjoy that sort of thing. Is that not weird?
Not really. See the article Frobert linked. Also, I gay and lesbian teens might approach sex the same way the “good” girls did in years gone by. The “good girls” got pregnant and the “bad girls” didn’t because the “good girls” weren’t honest with themselves about their sexuality and the “bad girls” were and so they were prepared and used birth control.
 
No, adolescents are hypersexual.
But the study was considering adolescent homosexuals compared to adolescent non homosexuals.

To be clear I’m saying that people acting on homosexual impulses are likely hypersexual. Though hypersexual impulses could also be a factor in homosexual acts.
 
Serious question for catholics who think lesbians should be able to artificially and deliberately deprive a child of a gender-balanced nuclear family - how exactly can the child of two gay or lesbian adoptive ‘parents’ keep the 5th Commandment?
How does the child with an abusive father do it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top