Let's perform a thought experiment: "Create a world of your own"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Economist
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think you misunderstood me. Since God is ever-loving and perfect, I’d just follow world building how He would.
 
I think you misunderstood me. Since God is ever-loving and perfect, I’d just follow world building how He would.
As described in the bible. You said you were going to use it as instructions. Presumably the world is exactly as God designed it. Could it be a world which He didn’t want?
 
Isn’t my world better?
That’s a value judgment that I am not prepared to make or endorse. Sorry, but with my limited knowledge I cannot definitively state that no predation > predation as a general rule.
 
40.png
Bradskii:
Isn’t my world better?
That’s a value judgment that I am not prepared to make or endorse. Sorry, but with my limited knowledge I cannot definitively state that no predation > predation as a general rule.
So before the fall wasn’t any better or worse than after?
 
I can’t say - I wasn’t there.
Me neither. So let’s just say that you have no idea if there was death and agony before the fall. Because you weren’t there.

As an aside, were there any other other times that are talked about in the bible when you ‘weren’t there’ that you cannot be sure about?
 
Carnivores did not eat meat originally. If I could be in charge for a while, I would love all the animals and none of them would be carnivores. Neither would the other creatures.

I am sure God loves His creatures more than I could, but I wouldn’t like to have His knowledge about what goes on in the world. He sees everything, no matter how good or cruel. All I have to do is get my mail and find news about cruelty to animals or turn on the news and hear about the shootings or child abuse, and I just collapse in on my core like a dying star. (Yes, that happens. Astronomy 101.)
 
This theme overall has been proposed in Science Fiction many times.

One particularly, in my opinion, fascinating take on creating your own universe is Ted Sturgeon’s “Microcosmic God”.

 
Last edited:
Is that a serious question? If we have disease, accident, starvation, old age and being eaten alive and we remove ‘being eaten alive’, can you seriously ask if that’s better? Honestly?
Dying over many weeks from starvation or disease, vs. being killed in a few seconds. Of course it’s a serious question, don’t be so dismissive.
 
I would just create a black-hole that just keeps getting bigger and bigger. But here’s the hitch, only the black-hole exists, and the creator does not.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Bradskii:
Is that a serious question? If we have disease, accident, starvation, old age and being eaten alive and we remove ‘being eaten alive’, can you seriously ask if that’s better? Honestly?
Dying over many weeks from starvation or disease, vs. being killed in a few seconds. Of course it’s a serious question, don’t be so dismissive.
It isn’t either/or. We are ADDING death by being torn apart alive. Hands up all those who think it’s a good idea…

There you go. Nobody does.

And by the way, I’m omnipotent. There’s food for all. Nobody starves. Unless you again want to suggest that an omnipotent being couldn’t prevent starvation?
 
And by the way, I’m omnipotent. There’s food for all. Nobody starves. Unless you again want to suggest that an omnipotent being couldn’t prevent starvation?
So really this is a debate about natural suffering?
 
40.png
Bradskii:
And by the way, I’m omnipotent. There’s food for all. Nobody starves. Unless you again want to suggest that an omnipotent being couldn’t prevent starvation?
So really this is a debate about natural suffering?
No. Just making a world that we think would be suitable. It has many aspects to it. This is just one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top