F
FaithRuir
Guest
I think you misunderstood me. Since God is ever-loving and perfect, I’d just follow world building how He would.
As described in the bible. You said you were going to use it as instructions. Presumably the world is exactly as God designed it. Could it be a world which He didn’t want?I think you misunderstood me. Since God is ever-loving and perfect, I’d just follow world building how He would.
That’s a value judgment that I am not prepared to make or endorse. Sorry, but with my limited knowledge I cannot definitively state that no predation > predation as a general rule.Isn’t my world better?
Either that or the reverse is true.I think you’re overthinking my posts.
So before the fall wasn’t any better or worse than after?Bradskii:
That’s a value judgment that I am not prepared to make or endorse. Sorry, but with my limited knowledge I cannot definitively state that no predation > predation as a general rule.Isn’t my world better?
I do not necessarily subscribe to the notion that before the fall = no predation.So before the fall wasn’t any better or worse than after?
OK. So there was fear and agony and death before the fall.Bradskii:
I do not necessarily subscribe to the notion that before the fall = no predation.So before the fall wasn’t any better or worse than after?
Me neither. So let’s just say that you have no idea if there was death and agony before the fall. Because you weren’t there.I can’t say - I wasn’t there.
Dying over many weeks from starvation or disease, vs. being killed in a few seconds. Of course it’s a serious question, don’t be so dismissive.Is that a serious question? If we have disease, accident, starvation, old age and being eaten alive and we remove ‘being eaten alive’, can you seriously ask if that’s better? Honestly?
That’s what generally happens when you asked a question. So what is the answer?That would be telling…
You should check the etymology of the word.Carnivores did not eat meat originally.
It isn’t either/or. We are ADDING death by being torn apart alive. Hands up all those who think it’s a good idea…Bradskii:
Dying over many weeks from starvation or disease, vs. being killed in a few seconds. Of course it’s a serious question, don’t be so dismissive.Is that a serious question? If we have disease, accident, starvation, old age and being eaten alive and we remove ‘being eaten alive’, can you seriously ask if that’s better? Honestly?
So really this is a debate about natural suffering?And by the way, I’m omnipotent. There’s food for all. Nobody starves. Unless you again want to suggest that an omnipotent being couldn’t prevent starvation?
No. Just making a world that we think would be suitable. It has many aspects to it. This is just one.Bradskii:
So really this is a debate about natural suffering?And by the way, I’m omnipotent. There’s food for all. Nobody starves. Unless you again want to suggest that an omnipotent being couldn’t prevent starvation?