Letter from a man whose mother was stoned to death

  • Thread starter Thread starter cestusdei
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I find it fascinating that pro “leaves” Catholicism because we are so mean, but now is actually defending stoning women to death in Islam.
 
I find it fascinating that pro “leaves” Catholicism because we are so mean, but now is actually defending stoning women to death in Islam.
Kind of puts a new spin on the old adage, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.”
 
burial up to his waist, and for a woman up to her neck (article 102
It must be a terrible ordeal. Poor people. To think that a man can deprive a woman of love and affection and if she finds it elsewhere, she could ‘end up dead’. Terrible, Brutal, Barbaric.

At least her suffering is over. There’s is yet to come. Whether the regime is legitimate or not, everyone who threw a stone will answer for it before Almighty God.

I ask my fellow Catholics to join me in prayer for the repose of their souls for Jeus said: ‘when to or more join together in prayer, there am I in the midst of them’. Perhaps one deprofundis or whatever one choses.
 
Kind of puts a new spin on the old adage, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.”
I kinda feel guilty that I found that funny, considering what a serious topic this is… :o
 
I find it fascinating that pro “leaves” Catholicism because we are so mean, but now is actually defending stoning women to death in Islam.
I’ve never found you to be particularly mean, just ignorant.

Please quote the language where I defend stoning. If you can’t do that, then admit that you lied about what I said.

I’m tired of watching you deliberately lie about what other people say. It’s childish and, combined with the fact that you openly claim to be a priest, defames your entire profession
 
You have indicated no problem with Iranian law or Saudi law for that matter. Stoning women is an old Islamic custom. But to be fair they do stone men and children too. Your religion has some interesting traditions.
 
You have indicated no problem with Iranian law or Saudi law for that matter. Stoning women is an old Islamic custom. But to be fair they do stone men and children too. Your religion has some interesting traditions.
How old is auto da fe?

This is some tactic of yours…accuse other people of supporting whatever, and then accuse them of lying when they deny it. You are a ridiculous excuse for a witness.
 
When was the last auto de fe? I can post about stonings that have happened within the last year in Islam. I don’t have to go back 500 years.
 
When was the last auto de fe? I can post about stonings that have happened within the last year in Islam. I don’t have to go back 500 years.
Some Catholics burned a “witch” in Guatemala just a couple of years ago. It’s a semi-regular event in rural latin America.
 
Really? How regular? Did the Church participate and approve of it? Let’s see the link. Let’s see a link that shows this is a regular even in Latin America. Oh, and how racist of you to attack those poor rural Indians.

Do you want me to post some more Islamic stoning stories and maybe some pics?
 
Really? How regular? Did the Church participate and approve of it? Let’s see the link. Let’s see a link that shows this is a regular even in Latin America. Oh, and how racist of you to attack those poor rural Indians.

Do you want me to post some more Islamic stoning stories and maybe some pics?
Classic tactics: deny deny deny, and then when you see proof, make excuses.

You support burning people.
 
Ah but pro, I was playing you. Demanding specific citations and details. You do that all the time. You have no proof at all. I actually do give links, which you then ignore. But it is fun to play it your way.

The point remains. The Church didn’t participate or approve. Islam does participate and approve of stoning. Muhammed sure did or haven’t you read the hadith?
 
Ah but pro, I was playing you. Demanding specific citations and details. You do that all the time. You have no proof at all. I actually do give links, which you then ignore. But it is fun to play it your way.

The point remains. The Church didn’t participate or approve. Islam does participate and approve of stoning. Muhammed sure did or haven’t you read the hadith?
What a lousy attempt at misdirection the point.

It’s proof cestus, you just made excuses when confronted with burning.

You support burning people. How disgusting.
 
If you can show the Catholic Church approved of this burning and was integrally involved then you would have a point. Please provide the link and the section of the code of canon law they used.

You yourself admit stoning is legal in Islam. Where have you said that stoning was wrong? I haven’t seen it. And if I do the next thing I will ask is “then why did Muhammed do it and command it?”
 
If you can show the Catholic Church approved of this burning and was integrally involved then you would have a point. Please provide the link and the section of the code of canon law they used.

You yourself admit stoning is legal in Islam. Where have you said that stoning was wrong? I haven’t seen it. And if I do the next thing I will ask is “then why did Muhammed do it and command it?”
How convenient. Yet again, you fail to condemn burning people in the name of Jesus.

I guess all this anger directed at other religions is understandable. You probably want to burn them. You support burning people, as proven by the lack of any words of sympathy for victims of these burnings.
 
I invite you to show me where we recently burned someone. In return I will post some stories of more stonings and invite you to condemn them. I would love to see you condemn stonings.
 
I invite you to show me where we recently burned someone. In return I will post some stories of more stonings and invite you to condemn them. I would love to see you condemn stonings.
Just keep up that state of denial cestusdei. It’s more proof that you support burning people.
 
"kellie:
I am so glad they are “legally” stoning people now.

How nice ! :mad:
I agree that it’s inhumane, but the fact is, Iran is not a lawless society and never has been.

So the law that provides this punishment passed supposedly in 1980, wasn’t on the books until 1991. That’s a strong indicator that the letter is a hoax.
You have indicated no problem with Iranian law or Saudi law for that matter. Stoning women is an old Islamic custom. But to be fair they do stone men and children too. Your religion has some interesting traditions.
To give pro a break, he did actually indicate he was against the stoning law.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top