Levels of heaven and hell

  • Thread starter Thread starter Roger12345
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Roger12345

Guest
Is it heretical to believe that hell and heaven have different levels? The individual who has been truly evil like Hitler is in a different level of hell than, say, someone who died when they were just over the age of reason and had committed one mortal sin. Or on the other hand someone who repented on their deathbed is in a different level of heaven than Mother Theresa.
 
Dante certainly believed it.
Or on the other hand someone who repented on their deathbed is in a different level of heaven than Mother Theresa.
Well, without getting into specific examples of uncanonized people, the visions on heaven given to John the Revelator indicate divisions in heaven between consecrated virgins and the multitudes, for example. Also my Benedictine friends are fond of saying that while all in heaven enjoy the same beatific vision, the consecrated life is designed to prepare one’s soul to more fully enjoy the vision in heaven.
 
There seems to be warrant in the NT for the existence of graduations of punishment for sin.

ICXC NIKA
 
Is it heretical to believe that hell and heaven have different levels? The individual who has been truly evil like Hitler is in a different level of hell than, say, someone who died when they were just over the age of reason and had committed one mortal sin. Or on the other hand someone who repented on their deathbed is in a different level of heaven than Mother Theresa.
gradations of punishment for gradations of evil is the only thing that makes any sense to me.
 
While I do think that there will be levels of punishment in Hell, because justice demands it, I don’t think that there will be levels of reward in Heaven. I present two reasons for this.

1: Levels / variations in amount imply a finite source. The only reasons that there would need to be levels is if there were something preventing everyone from sharing in the source equally. Since God is infinite, there would be no reason for levels.

2: Justice doesn’t demand it. Examples have been given about how a person who lives a consecrated life may experience a greater version of the beatific vision than someone else. This doesn’t really make sense for one main reason: If the consecrated life were available equally to all people, then maybe I could see it; but as Catholics we understand it to be a calling, and one which not all people are called to. Why should someone who is called to a consecrated life be rewarded more fully than someone who is called to the life of a parent?

As evidence, I present:

[BIBLEDRB]Matthew 20:1-16[/BIBLEDRB]

As for Hell, I stated that I think Justice demands it. I present this reasoning:

Hell is, ultimately, the result of rejecting God and His Truth in our lives. Rejection, however, takes many forms. There is the rejection that comes from fear, say of a Muslim who wishes to convert, but fears the pain it will likely cause him, and the ill effects his family will also probably suffer. I would argue that this rejection, born of prudence, is not the same as, say, a man who kills for hire. The latter has rejected the natural law out of greed, and so his rejection is far worse than the other’s.

Even within this latter example, there is probably a spectrum. Consider someone who kills out of desperation, for food or other necessities… While this action is still an abhorrent reject of God, and could not be justified through natural law, the reasons behind it are far superior to those of the man who kills for money, and so I would argue that the one killing out of desperation would suffer a lesser punishment than the one who kills for hire.

At the other end of the spectrum, what of a person who was never baptized. Perhaps there is someone who has heard the word of God, and is in the process of considering it / considering conversion. They have not made the final decision because they simply have not learned enough to do so. Otherwise, however, this person is a good person and lives a good life that would make any Christian proud. If this person were to die before their baptism, is it just for them to suffer the same torments as the man who kills for hire?

So, there’s my two cents on the subject.
 
That is the Catholic doctrine. The actual torments of Hell are due to actual sins and so are proportionate to the number and gravity of the sins. Likewise, the bliss of those in Heaven is proporionate to their merits.

From the Council of Florence:

Also, the souls of those who have incurred no stain of sin whatsoever after baptism, as well as souls who after incurring the stain of sin have been cleansed whether in their bodies or outside their bodies, as was stated above, are straightaway received into heaven and clearly behold the triune God as he is, yet one person more perfectly than another according to the difference of their merits. But the souls of those who depart this life in actual mortal sin, or in original sin alone, go down straightaway to hell to be punished, but with unequal pains.
ewtn.com/library/councils/florence.htm
 
The Bible also.

“Behold, I am coming soon! My reward is with me, and I will give to everyone according to what he has done” (Revelation 22:12).
 
Even on Earth in this life there exist varying degrees of holiness.

Some seek to do God’s will more than others.

It’s like working out. The more you do it, the more results you will see.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top