(Yeah I remembered how to quote things

)
I wasn’t attempting to hurt feelings by anonymously responding on an internet forum. I am serious. If you find yourself imagining about babies or even yourself being withdrawn from or denied treatment to die, have you considered the guidance of someone in the professional field? Please remember that the idea of professional guidance in my generation is considered a beneficial thing and not a stigma or insult.
Thank you for your concern. Sometimes I forget on board that people can’t always read the tone of a post. I really don’t spend an excessive amount of time on this topic. My original post was written over a year ago. When my SIl was going through this, I was simply going through the thought process of what I might do in the same situation and the morality of it. That is all. I know when we post on these boards we don’t know what the person is thinking or their intentions, and we can’t see the tone of the letter. It is natural for us to try and read between the lines. I know when I read posts I have to be careful. I think we all read posts through the blinders of our own personal experiences. Hopefully no hard feelings. I am sorry that I said your post was mean.
Thinking about the cost of maintaining a life versus just letting that life die, or even accelerating that death, has been maintained as a symptom of suicidal ideation and can come from a multitude of issues, such as depression.
It is Not just letting a life die. It is knowing when excessive intervention is futile and when to leave it soley up to God. That’s a tough decision and I personally don’t want to ever have to make a decision like that. Unfortunately there are people every day having to make decisions and face issues like that. I can assure you that I am not depressed and do not have any suicidal intentions. But thanks again for your concern.
It is only very recently that the media in America has picked up the issue of killing newborns or euthanising the elderly or handicapped as a moral good. Before that popular change, wanting to kill or die was a symptom that the mind and/or body needed healing.
Actually it is a very old idea in many cultures. (Not Christian) Ancient Rome and Greece come to mind.
Also, you mentioned wondering if it would be wrong to deny extreme treatment. Can you define your interpretation of that?
No, every case is different and since we are talking hypotheticals no. I gave two scenarios of baby Kolby and baby Samuel and I can’t pass judgement on either one.
Do you consider providing oxygen to a person to be an extreme form of treatment? Is intubation extreme treatment?
Again hypothetical. Maybe in some cases.
If you experienced a severe allergic reaction, would you refuse intubation?
No, not if that was the only issue.
In the case of a newborn or child below the general age of reason, do you consider it okay to rule on the side of death?
Again go to Kolby’s story.
angelfire.com/hero/kolbysstory/index.html
I do not believe his parents ruled on the side of death, nor committed a mortal sin of murder
I was asking all my questions to try to find out what you were looking for in posting. What are you hoping to find out? Where do you see lines of thought ending?
Thats ok. Hopefully I’ve been clearer. When I originally posted I wanted to know would it be wrong to withhold extreme invasive aggressive treatment in some cases from a Catholic viewpoint. As I said I have already gotten the answer.
I am thankful I haven’t had to make these type of decisions. For people that do they need lots of prayer. Again hopefully no hard feelings.
Deana