E
Exalt
Guest
Melman:
That’s a very good point. Would you support a LT program if it had this sort of “liturgical education”? We’ve considered having trips to parishes that offer masses in a much different style then our own - ie: traditional Tridentine masses. However, I do want to point out that cantor and organ masses are the norm for most masses - thus, a LT mass with that particular style would be unneccessary. The point, however, isn’t the music surrounding the mass, it’s the Eucharist. Teens know this very well, but as a few people on this thread have pointed out, there needs to be some “fine-tuning” indeed.I am no more able to speak for all teens than you are, but I disagree with that premise. If teens have been educated in the faith by “youth ministers” and “praise and worship and energy and joy” is all they know, then their education isn’t broad enough to make an informed decision. If LT is to provide education, then why doesn’t the format alternate from guitars one week, to organ and chant the next, a quiet mass the next? Then a full education on “liturgical styles” can be had.
Yep, this is the fundamental disagreement. I want to make one appeal, however. It seems that the Bishops have favored the interpretation to consider youth as a seperate culture that is appropriate for having a seperate mass. Check out the USCCB document Renewing the Vision. Particularly, the section on Praise and Worship.I agree with you - this is the impasse of the debate. You interpret the GIRM to say that age-targeted masses are appropriate, and some of us don’t think “culture of the people” and “needs of the listeners” should be interpreted that broadly.