Life Teen

  • Thread starter Thread starter tonysales1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
An evening Mass tends to be at a good time for most teenagers to get to, similarly if their friends are going to be there they’re more likely to go … just because teenagers go to a particular Mass doesn’t mean they somehow like the liturgy far more than another …
My youngest child is now 21, and goes to the 5:30 pm mass on Sunday where he lives. He hates the liturgy there, and talks about how goofy it is (not a LifeTeen mass, but similar).

Yet still he attends. Why?

Because attending the 5:30 pm mass allows him to stay out late on Saturday night, sleep in on Sunday, and still fulfill his Sunday obligation.

I used to attend a 10:30 am mass that I absolutely *loathed *because of the music played then; drums, electric guitar, electric piano, and the occasional jazzy saxophone solo. Yet I would often choose it over the 8:00 am mass which was much better musically, simply because of the time.

I have never seen a LifeTeen mass scheduled any other time than in the evening. They often attract older people, too. I wonder if it’s because so many people really love the LifeTeen mass, or they just find the time convenient.

How about scheduling LifeTeen masses at 8:00 am Sunday morning, with the more traditional masses in the usual 10:30-11:30 am slots. I bet the attendance level at LifeTeen would dive precipitously and teens would suddenly find a whole new appreciation for Gregorian chant. LOL

One definitely can’t discount the mass time when making assumptions about how “popular” a particular mass is.
 
There is a huge difference between a 13-year-old and a 24-year-old.

Generally speaking (and I do mean GENERALLY!), many 13-year-olds and even older teenagers do not possess the ability to think abstractly. A recent study of algebra has made this clear–not all teenagers are ready for abstract thinking. However, most 24-year-olds are capable of thinking abstractly.

I personally think this could explain why teenagers don’t “get” many traditional hymns, which are loaded with imagery. Some of those simplistic “fluffy” contemporary songs that many of you condemn are actually very appropriate for a teenager who truly doesn’t understand “higher” music.

(There are teens who CAN think abstractly. If you are one of these, great. But you can’t expect all your peers to be at the same place you are, right? Just like some teenaged girls have a bosom and others are flat. We all develop differently.)



I could list many more differences. The fact is, there is a huge difference between you and teens.
There is also a huge difference between a 13 and an 18 year old. But either that difference, or the one between a 13 and 24 year old is nothing like that great as between an 18 year old and someone in their 50s.

I’d better tell my Maths class that, after all almost all of us will have degrees of some sort in Pure or Applied Maths before we’re 24, while still not being able to think abstractly, generally speaking of course.

Without going too far off track that has far more to do with the American curriculum and the way it’s taught than the children. Many countries have children doing equations involving fairly difficult polynomials before they’re out of Primary, even doing a straight comparison one DHT who taught at my high school had been involved in a exchange programme with an America high school, he said that material wise they were at least a year or more behind what was being covered at our school. Mainly because of different educational and pedagogical philosophies but behind nonetheless.

Again teenagers do not need the words dumbed down for them, surprising as it may be to you most teenagers have a literacy level above the average 5 year old. I don’t know quite what literature is taught in American schools but by the time we’re teenagers we’ve generally done at least some Shakespeare, various other authors, essay writing, critical evaluation etc.

In addition if what you are saying is true it would be an argument against using songs which refer to the Bread/Bread of Life rather than Body and Blood, otherwise it confuses the issue by using imagery for the Body of Blood while to their, apparently ‘fluffy’, minds it may be bread is bread, not the Body and Blood of Christ.

I guess this is just one of those things where we have to agree to disagree. I can understand if other teenagers don’t catch on if we’re talking about General or Special Relativity, but in the Scottish system we expect just about everyone to understand some algebra. Similarly I wouldn’t necessarily expect all Scottish teenagers to be able to do an in depth discussion of imagery in King Lear, but the expectation would be that they would pick up on some of it.

If you like I could start listing the differences between a 51 year old and an average teenager. I can assure you there’s probably far more than between a teenager and a 24 year old. The point of course is not age but understanding, some insist that what they liked during their youth, and what they might have wanted the Church/their parents to do for them is also what teenagers today want. Some insist on ridding roughshod over whatever teenagers might say, others will accept that just maybe teenagers know what they want better than people who were the same age 30 or 40 years ago.
 
My youngest child is now 21, and goes to the 5:30 pm mass on Sunday where he lives. He hates the liturgy there, and talks about how goofy it is (not a LifeTeen mass, but similar).

Yet still he attends. Why?

Because attending the 5:30 pm mass allows him to stay out late on Saturday night, sleep in on Sunday, and still fulfill his Sunday obligation.

I used to attend a 10:30 am mass that I absolutely *loathed *because of the music played then; drums, electric guitar, electric piano, and the occasional jazzy saxophone solo. Yet I would often choose it over the 8:00 am mass which was much better musically, simply because of the time.

I have never seen a LifeTeen mass scheduled any other time than in the evening. They often attract older people, too. I wonder if it’s because so many people really love the LifeTeen mass, or they just find the time convenient.

How about scheduling LifeTeen masses at 8:00 am Sunday morning, with the more traditional masses in the usual 10:30-11:30 am slots. I bet the attendance level at LifeTeen would dive precipitously and teens would suddenly find a whole new appreciation for Gregorian chant. LOL

One definitely can’t discount the mass time when making assumptions about how “popular” a particular mass is.
I have an even better one for you. The “young adult” Mass in my parish is 1PM on Sundays. The children’s chior performs at the 11AM. Now, the choir for the 1PM Mass, which is supposed to target the teens, doesn’t have a single person under the age of 30 in the group. In fact, the one who sings the psalm is in his 50s. Most of the group is in the Philharmonic chorale. But, instead of hearing genuine sacred music, the music director chooses stuff from Spirit and Song. When I asked her about this, she told me that it’s done to attract the teens. There aren’t even young (relatively speaking) people in the choir (the assumed targeted audience)! The children sing the stuff from the OCP kiddie songbook, which is really bad (not the kids, the selections they sing).

Our pastor gave the choirs the weekend off the second Sunday of Easter. My parochial vicar had a field day at the 1PM Mass and led the folks in singing traditional hymns like Jesus Christ is Risen Today and Alleluia, Sing to Jesus, as well as At the Lamb’s High Feast We Sing. Everyone was singing. The same phenomena occurred at the other Masses (English and Spanish). And yes, the teens and the kids were singing as well, although the young cantor for the Children’s Mass looked a little confused with the music, but, that is the fault of the music director for not exposing these kids to genuine Sacred Music.
 
Our lifeteen mass is at noon and it is packed with all ages. (including about 50-70 teens).
 
snhs,

You live in Scotland?

How much time have you spent in the United States?

Thank you.

BTW, most people develop the ability to think abstractly in their young teens. For me, it was around age 15. For some, it’s earlier, for some, it’s later. I’m not sure if I gave an incorrect impression that 24-year-olds can’t think abstractly yet. If I did, I apologize.
 
snhs,

You live in Scotland?

How much time have you spent in the United States?

Thank you.

BTW, most people develop the ability to think abstractly in their young teens. For me, it was around age 15. For some, it’s earlier, for some, it’s later. I’m not sure if I gave an incorrect impression that 24-year-olds can’t think abstractly yet. If I did, I apologize.
Cat, perhaps you’ve not looked at the name of this forum for a while. To give you a hand it’s Catholic Answers, not American Catholic Answers or Answers given only by American Catholics. If we’re to believe you on this topic I can’t give a valid comment because I’m not American, another’s isn’t worthwhile because he’s 24 and can think abstractly whereas apparently (in your view) teenagers can’t and Benedictgal’s comments can be dismissed because she generalises and because in your Diocese X, Y, Z has happened.

To remind you of what the first poster in this thread asked way back in September 2007 it was “As a youth minister running Life Teen in a parish… i wish to hear from you as to what your thoughts are if you have experienced a Teen mass or life nights?”, notice that he didn’t say if you are an American national and have attended an officially sanctioned Lifeteen Teen Mass. Honestly if someone had told me I needed a Green Card before I could post on a topic I wouldn’t have bothered registering in the first place.

And again you failed to answer any of the substantive points. Wherever you’re getting your discussion tactics from I suggest you revise your source, it’s horribly transparent when you attempt to discredit any views contrary to your own by such methods, it’s all the more transparent when it seems to be the only tactic you have other than protracted anecdotal evidence. It does neither you nor your argument any favours, and I think it’s against at least one of the conduct rules I’ve seen on one of the sub boards.

Whatever you may wish to believe an 18 year old in Scotland has more in common with an 18 year old in America than with someone who is 30-40 years older and who has not been through the same experience of growing up in the Catholic Church devoid of many of Her traditional practices and hymns while older youth leaders and parents try to insist they know better than the teenagers what they want.
 
Yes, of course you are a “young” person. But no, you are not a teenager, which is the topic of this thread Llife TEEN Mass. Life TEEN Mass is designed to appeal to TEENS, not 20-somethings. There are many people who are not teens who like Life Teen Mass (I’m 51, a boomer). But the fact remains–the program “Life Teen” is for teenagers.

There is a huge difference between a 13-year-old and a 24-year-old.

Generally speaking (and I do mean GENERALLY!), many 13-year-olds and even older teenagers do not possess the ability to think abstractly. A recent study of algebra has made this clear–not all teenagers are ready for abstract thinking. However, most 24-year-olds are capable of thinking abstractly.

I personally think this could explain why teenagers don’t “get” many traditional hymns, which are loaded with imagery. Some of those simplistic “fluffy” contemporary songs that many of you condemn are actually very appropriate for a teenager who truly doesn’t understand “higher” music.

(There are teens who CAN think abstractly. If you are one of these, great. But you can’t expect all your peers to be at the same place you are, right? Just like some teenaged girls have a bosom and others are flat. We all develop differently.)
Here’s my bone of contention with that-
I teach this age group. I wanted to teach “Of Mice and Men” to my “regular” students, but was told that the students would not understand the book and, therefore, hate it.
Imagine the department’s surprise when the kids not only LOVED the book, but sailed through it, aced the final exam, and created projects that riviled the depth of the Honors students. AND imagine everyone’s surprise when our classes turned into group discussions regarding the book, rather than lecture, because they students (again- SURPRISE!) “got” the book and wanted to discuss it amongst themselves.

So- given the chance to experience something, rather than what a bunch of adults deem as “teen”, teenagers will jump at the chance.
You have the set the bar high and show teens how to get there, not set the bar low and say “we only expect you to understand this much, or like this, because you’re teens”.
 
I am going to quote myself:

"As I have stated over and over again-
We need to make the Mass itself traditonal, and not try imitate our seperated brethern,
P&W has it’s place, just not within the context of Mass. Have a P&W time before the Mass to get spirituality kicked up, segway into the Rosary (perhaps even sing it, like on the Dana and Fr. Scallion CD?), and then into Sacred silence.

I can’t think of anything that would be more fun, for me at least.
Then, go to some sort of “Sunday School” meeting afterward, and elaborate on the readings, have Father come in and give an extended homily and discuss the readings, Church traditon, etc… Like RCIA- only better!

I think that by using the above formula, and perhaps using the Latin NO to epmphasize the Holiness and Specialness of the Mass would be a wonderful way for youngins, like myself, to come back to the Church.

I am, personally, a bizarre mixture of Charismatic and Traditionalist, and I think that scares some people. But I think that is what my generation is- a mixture of the best of V2 (and sometimes the worst) and the desire to return to pre-V2 worship.
 
PatienceAndLove;4335627 said:
I am going to
"As I have stated over and over again-
We need to make the Mass itself traditonal, and not try imitate our seperated brethern,
P&W has it’s place, just not within the context of Mass. Have a P&W time before the Mass to get spirituality kicked up, segway into the Rosary (perhaps even sing it, like on the Dana and Fr. Scallion CD?), and then into Sacred silence.
I can’t think of anything that would be more fun, for me at least.
Then, go to some sort of “Sunday School” meeting afterward, and elaborate on the readings, have Father come in and give an extended homily and discuss the readings, Church traditon, etc… Like RCIA- only better!
I think that by using the above formula, and perhaps using the Latin NO to epmphasize the Holiness and Specialness of the Mass would be a wonderful way for youngins, like myself, to come back to the Church.
I am, personally, a bizarre mixture of Charismatic and Traditionalist, and I think that scares some people. But I think that is what my generation is- a mixture of the best of V2 (and sometimes the worst) and the desire to return to pre-V2 worship.
I think this sounds like a wonderful approach. The only problem I can see with it is that in our parish, the Sunday Masses follow each other with only a half hour break between them, and the set up and tear-down for contemporary music takes some time. But I think the schedule could be worked out.

I’ve been in parishes where AFTER the Mass, there is a Praise and Worship time. There was also an Adoration Chapel as you walk out of the church so that those who wished to adore the Lord and pray silently could do so.
 
As a youth minister running Life Teen in a parish… i wish to hear from you as to what your thoughts are if you have experienced a Teen mass or life nights? What about the idea of modern praise and worship music in a mass and during the Eucharistic Prayer having youth around the altar?
I trust that my fellow Catholics have already cited why it is bad (and prohibited) for teens to stand around the altar during the EP.

Also, what is so wrong and horrible about traditional music, such as Gregorian Chant? It worked for 1970 years, and helped create thousands of saints, hundreds of thousands of priests, and helped to inspire the creation of the most beautiful churches ever.
 
Here’s my bone of contention with that-
I teach this age group. I wanted to teach “Of Mice and Men” to my “regular” students, but was told that the students would not understand the book and, therefore, hate it.
Imagine the department’s surprise when the kids not only LOVED the book, but sailed through it, aced the final exam, and created projects that riviled the depth of the Honors students. AND imagine everyone’s surprise when our classes turned into group discussions regarding the book, rather than lecture, because they students (again- SURPRISE!) “got” the book and wanted to discuss it amongst themselves.

So- given the chance to experience something, rather than what a bunch of adults deem as “teen”, teenagers will jump at the chance.
You have the set the bar high and show teens how to get there, not set the bar low and say “we only expect you to understand this much, or like this, because you’re teens”.
I, too, work with teenagers in several different organizations, mainly musical and theater. I also volunteer at my daughters’ school (they are grown up, but I keep helping out the school anyway).

So I think that even if someone like yourself, or me, is not teen-aged, we can still speak with some measure of expertise about teenagers at least in our own locale.

I absolutely agree about setting a high bar. My daughters attended a college prep school, and both took several AP courses during their Junior and Senior years. (It paid off, too. My older daughter graduated from college early. saving us thousands of dollars.)

Their school has the honor of posting the highest scores in the world on the AP World History Exam. The history professor employs a “question and answer” method in his class, rather than just lecturing. He is beloved by the students.

Both girls enjoyed the Of Mice And Men. In fact, it’s the only book that my younger daughter actually read in high school! (She has a slight reading disability, and we didn’t find out about it until she was a Senior, but she still got straight As because she is an excellent listener.)

I happen to think that Life Teen DOES set a high bar for music. It is my personal opinion that there is nothing inferior or fluffy about the various songs that are often done at our Life Teen Mass. I think that the various instruments used–guitar, drums, keyboard–are difficult to play. Finally, I think that the vocal technique required to sing these songs is challenging.

I also think that, depending on the leaders, the Life Teen organization sets a high bar in other areas. The teenagers in our parish are challenged to pursue spirituality over the world. I often see them at the Adoration Chapel. They are very active in various pro-life events. And they do service projects.

So I don’t think “Life Teen” and “low expectations” are necessarily synonymous.
 
Cat, perhaps you’ve not looked at the name of this forum for a while. To give you a hand it’s Catholic Answers, not American Catholic Answers or Answers given only by American Catholics. If we’re to believe you on this topic I can’t give a valid comment because I’m not American, another’s isn’t worthwhile because he’s 24 and can think abstractly whereas apparently (in your view) teenagers can’t and Benedictgal’s comments can be dismissed because she generalises and because in your Diocese X, Y, Z has happened.

To remind you of what the first poster in this thread asked way back in September 2007 it was “As a youth minister running Life Teen in a parish… i wish to hear from you as to what your thoughts are if you have experienced a Teen mass or life nights?”, notice that he didn’t say if you are an American national and have attended an officially sanctioned Lifeteen Teen Mass. Honestly if someone had told me I needed a Green Card before I could post on a topic I wouldn’t have bothered registering in the first place.

And again you failed to answer any of the substantive points. Wherever you’re getting your discussion tactics from I suggest you revise your source, it’s horribly transparent when you attempt to discredit any views contrary to your own by such methods, it’s all the more transparent when it seems to be the only tactic you have other than protracted anecdotal evidence. It does neither you nor your argument any favours, and I think it’s against at least one of the conduct rules I’ve seen on one of the sub boards.

Whatever you may wish to believe an 18 year old in Scotland has more in common with an 18 year old in America than with someone who is 30-40 years older and who has not been through the same experience of growing up in the Catholic Church devoid of many of Her traditional practices and hymns while older youth leaders and parents try to insist they know better than the teenagers what they want.
“I can’t give a valid comment because I’m not American”–

I didn’t say this, snhs. I merely asked if you live in Scotland and how much experience you have in the United States. You are the one who jumped to conclusions.

Although as long as you brought it up, I must say that I don’t understand how anyone can draw conclusions about people that they have never met, let alone lived with. I’ve never met Scottish teenagers or visited Scotland, so I have a lot of stereotypes in my mind about them, and I’m sure that I’m totally wrong about all my stereotypes! (e.g., I think that all Scottish teenagers play golf.)

snhs, please keep in mind that I raised two daughters, who were teenagers for several years, and I do a lot of volunteer work in my community with teengers.

“another’s isn’t worthwhile because he’s 24”–

snhs, again, I didn’t say this. I made a list of the differences between most teenagers and most 24-year-olds. I never said that the 24-year-old’s viewpoint isn’t worthwhile.

“and can think abstractly whereas apparently (in your view) teenagers can’t”–

snhs, it is not “my view” that teenagers can’t think abstractly. My husband, a math major, has read several papers about this, stating that the ability to think abstractly develops at different times in teenagers. This information is important to math teachers as they attempt to teach algebra, which requires abstract thinking (n = 8) to young teenagers.

“and Benedictgal’s comments can be dismissed because she generalises”–

snhs, I do not believe that Benedictgal’s comments can be “dismissed.”

“and because in your Diocese X, Y, Z has happened.”–

Yes, and this is what I based my opinions on–real life. I think it is valid to base opinions on what we have actually seen and heard with our own eyes and ears, and what we have learned from others. Certainly the Catholic who has been around for a longer time has a broader experience base than I do and therefore, will probably have the more correct assessment of a situation. But I am certainly not off base to draw conclusions based on what I have seen, books I have read (Catholic), people I have talked to (Catholic), and seminars and workshops (Catholic) that I’ve attended. The alternative is to base opinions on speculation and personal preference.
 
40.png
Cat:
No you asked it because you wanted to add it into the thread, you already know I’m from Scotland hence there was no point in the question except to record it on this thread.

Spending time with teenagers does not equate to being one, nor does it mean that what you think they like/want necessarily bears any resemblance to what they do.

You try to minimise others contribution by finding fault with them, probably because you either can’t or won’t do so with their argument, apart from anything else it’s not a very Christian thing to be doing. For example you raised the point of how on earth children would learn chant when they don’t have Catholic schools to teach them it, instead of responding to Patienceandlove’s post where she says in her experience how much easier someone found it to pick up chant as opposed to modern hymns you start telling us about how different 13 year olds and 24 year olds are.

I’m doing a Maths degree, those concepts were introduced well before the teenage years in our schools and in other countries they are introduced still earlier, the ability to think abstractly is not innate, most of the time it must be taught. If a country decides not to put a lot of effort into teaching it until they’re teenagers then it shouldn’t be all that surprising if they don’t all pick up complex numbers on a whim.

Yet the first comment you felt it worth writing in your last response to her was “You’re making some huge generalizations about teenagers and young people (and boomers, too–a lot people my age do not enjoy “traditional” music)”? And despite the fact you quote her post at the top you almost completely ignored the substantive point, as you’ve done almost every other time I’ve seen you post. And you certainly didn’t seem to take much account of what the quote provided from the Pope said, in which he explicitly mentions the rock genre which you are apparently so in favour of having at Mass.

Yet earlier you were telling us your opinion that teenagers don’t think abstractly was based on studies your husband has read? Does that count as real life? If it does perhaps you could have a go at explaining the study presented on a previous thread where teenagers of almost all faiths and none favoured traditional hymns and Chant ahead of other genres, including P&W and rock, for Mass. I can tell you which is more reliable mathematically when it comes down to Cat’s real life and a study of a few hundred teenagers.

You are still missing the point. Teenagers growing up today are in a completely different situation to that which their parents and grandparents grew up in. For their parents it was often the swinging 60s, the time of VII with the changes that it caused for many people, for their grandparents it was the TLM and traditional practices at least some of which vanished from many Parishes after VII. Coming from those different backgrounds unless you actually comprehend what teenagers are saying and are willing to listen to them then you are almost certainly going to come out with the wrong answer. Falling back on what you like or what you wanted when you were a teenager, either in the Catholic Church or Protestant, is not going to work. And it is far too complex an issue to just say ‘teenagers go to this Mass, hurrah the rock music gets them to Church’.

What you have read? So you read the quote Benedictgal provided from Pope Benedict earlier, right? Perhaps you can give us your view on it, especially the part where he writes "On the one hand, there is pop music, which is certainly no longer supported by the people in the ancient sense (populus). It is aimed at the phenomenon of the masses, is industrially produced, and ultimately has to be described as a cult of the banal. “Rock", on the other hand, is the expression of elemental passions, and at rock festivals it assumes a cultic character, a form of worship, in fact, in opposition to Christian worship. …the participants sink, as it were, beneath the elemental force of the universe. The music of the Holy Spirit’s sober inebriation seems to have little chance when self has become a prison, the mind is a shackle, and breaking out from both appears as a true promise of redemption that can be tasted at least for a few moments.”

Instead of responding to the first parts of this post most of which have resulted from side issues you’ve brought up perhaps you could try responding to something substantive, either from this or previous posts.

In particular I think you’ve said previously that you don’t attend the TLM, how do you know how many teenagers attend? In addition is it likely to be at a time when most teenagers will be able to get there, do you have any evidence that they go to that Mass for the music rather than any other factor? Furthermore if you have time to actually respond to something other than a direct question your response to the following would be appreciated:

“And please stop being so patronising, the faith which Catholic teenagers have is the same Catholic Faith which has been handed down since the time of the Apostles. If we are going to Mass it is to participate in our Catholic Faith, it would be nice if we could have Catholic music, and hear about the example from Scripture of how to lead a Catholic life rather than whatever music was written back in the 60s, which was also probably the last time it was popular to mainstream teenagers, if it ever was, and some homily which is often low on substance. Look at the reaction Pope Benedict got at WYD, Homilies should be challenging, the Mass, and every part of it, should be an invitation to grow and deepen involvement in the Faith, superficial music and liturgy doesn’t do that do that.”
 
No you asked it because you wanted to add it into the thread, you already know I’m from Scotland hence there was no point in the question except to record it on this thread.

Spending time with teenagers does not equate to being one, nor does it mean that what you think they like/want necessarily bears any resemblance to what they do.

In particular I think you’ve said previously that you don’t attend the TLM, how do you know how many teenagers attend? In addition is it likely to be at a time when most teenagers will be able to get there, do you have any evidence that they go to that Mass for the music rather than any other factor? Furthermore if you have time to actually respond to something other than a direct question your response to the following would be appreciated:
I’m sorry I had to delete most of your post. CAF wouldn’t allow me to answer because of the number of characters.

I’m working this weekend. But this is a quick answer to the boldface above. I have a few friends who attend the TLM, and they talk to me about attendance. They know the numbers and demographics.

Also, I honestly didn’t know you were from Scotland. If you told it to me before, I forgot. Old folks like me do that. I’m sorry I forgot. Please don’t rake me over the coals about it, OK?

Honestly, snhs, I don’t know where to begin. I honestly don’t. And it doesn’t really matter, does it? I don’t seem to be able to communicate with you at all, do I? So let’s just end it, OK? If you want to believe that means that I don’t know how to respond to you, you’re right. I have no idea what to say to some of the statements you’ve made in your post to me. If you want to believe that makes you correct, go ahead. You aren’t, but I can’t communicate with you. Maybe someone else can.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top