Life Teen

  • Thread starter Thread starter tonysales1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree with the first, but I usually see much greater devotion to the Eucharist a youth and charismatic Masses, when recipients are fully aware of just what it means to receive the Body of Christ into their own bodies. I contrast this with so many traditional (not TLM) Masses I have attended where many sit down and talk after Communion, or rattle their rosary beads during the homily. Where is the reverence in that?

Now, I’m not saying all traditionalists are like that, or that all youth choirs (bands) are reverent, but I am saying that more contemporary music can be every bit as reverent as what some believe to be “traditional.” As I’ve said elsewhere, let’s bring back harps, lutes, and songs only in Aramaic if we want to celebrate the liturgy as the early church did.
I am afraid that you might be generalizing things a bit too much. While you did clarify some things, I don’t think that quite a few people are chattering up a storm after receiving Holy Communion, either at an EF Mass (or even an OF Mass, for that matter). As far as reciting the Rosary during the Mass, that has not happened much in the few TLM that I have attended, although, I have seen it at an OF Mass on occasion, especially when a member of the assembly doesn’t understand the language in which the homily is preached (eg. an exclusive Spanish speaker attending an English-language Mass–praying, in this case, is certainly understandable). In fact, people are absorbed in prayer because they recognize the profundity of the sacred mysteries unfolding before them

Remember, too, that the bodies in the pews are not the only ones partaking of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. The entire Church is present: the Church Triumphant (the saints in heaven), the Church Suffering (the souls in purgatory) and the Church Militant (those of us here on earth) unite together. The contemporary music does not reflect this particularly important aspect of our faith. It centers around “Me”, “I” and “We” and how grand and glorious the community is. This is not the message we should be sending to young people. Contemporrary music is more about the feel-good here and now aspect and not about the mysteries of our Faith. It doesn’t have the Sensus Fideum that is found in much of the Church’s rich treasury of Sacred Music.

Have you looked through the texts of hymns such as Attende Domine, O Sun of Justice, Creator of the Stars of Night, Pangia Lingua, O Salutaris and Laud Sion? These songs contain rich kernels of our faith. “Lord I Lift Your Name on High” and “Shine, Jesus Shine” don’t even come close.
 
I am afraid that you might be generalizing things a bit too much. While you did clarify some things, I don’t think that quite a few people are chattering up a storm after receiving Holy Communion, either at an EF Mass (or even an OF Mass, for that matter). As far as reciting the Rosary during the Mass, that has not happened much in the few TLM that I have attended, although, I have seen it at an OF Mass on occasion, especially when a member of the assembly doesn’t understand the language in which the homily is preached (eg. an exclusive Spanish speaker attending an English-language Mass–praying, in this case, is certainly understandable). In fact, people are absorbed in prayer because they recognize the profundity of the sacred mysteries unfolding before them

Remember, too, that the bodies in the pews are not the only ones partaking of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. The entire Church is present: the Church Triumphant (the saints in heaven), the Church Suffering (the souls in purgatory) and the Church Militant (those of us here on earth) unite together. The contemporary music does not reflect this particularly important aspect of our faith. It centers around “Me”, “I” and “We” and how grand and glorious the community is. This is not the message we should be sending to young people. Contemporrary music is more about the feel-good here and now aspect and not about the mysteries of our Faith. It doesn’t have the Sensus Fideum that is found in much of the Church’s rich treasury of Sacred Music.

Have you looked through the texts of hymns such as Attende Domine, O Sun of Justice, Creator of the Stars of Night, Pangia Lingua, O Salutaris and Laud Sion? These songs contain rich kernels of our faith. “Lord I Lift Your Name on High” and “Shine, Jesus Shine” don’t even come close.
These are your personal opinions about contemporary music. They are not facts.

These statements are especially questionable: *The entire Church is present: the Church Triumphant (the saints in heaven), the Church Suffering (the souls in purgatory) and the Church Militant (those of us here on earth) unite together. The contemporary music does not reflect this particularly important aspect of our faith. It centers around “Me”, “I” and “We” and how grand and glorious the community is. *

You admonish the poster against generalizing; these statements are a massive generalization.

It is MY personal opinion that of all the styles of music, rock music unites people. I recognize that it is only my personal opinion, not a fact.

BTW, I recognize that the two contemporary hymns you mentioned Lord I Lift Your Name On High and Shine Jesus Shine are not rock music, IMO, but they can be played and sung with a rock band accompaniment, as can any hymn, actually.

Here is the chorus to Shine Jesus Shine:

Shine Jesus shine
Fill this land with the fathers glory
Blaze, spirit blaze,
Set our hearts on fire
Flow, river flow
Flood the nations with grace and mercy
Send forth your word
Lord and let there be light.

This doesn’t seem to be emphasizing the greatness and grandness of the community at all, but rather praying that the Lord would have mercy on the NATIONS, send forth His Word, and bring light and grace to these nations. Are you against that?

IN fact, the words to this chorus remind me of the Holy Spirit prayer that Catholics pray.

The hymns that you listed as good–as long as they are in a language that I understand, yes, they will help create unity as we sing them together. But when they are in a foreign language, a lot of us are left out. I personally don’t have the ability to read music, sing the Latin, and follow the translation all at the same time, so I sing the Latin and wonder what I’m saying. OR I read the English words and don’t sing–how does that contribute to our unity? Yes, you personally are blessed by these hymns and led to a greater sense of unity in the Body of Christ. Others aren’t. Although you and others love singing the Latin hymns, I don’t. I really don’t. I just don’t get what you all get out of it.

Bottom line: we can’t generalize about music.
 
actrually, Cat, the notion that the entire Church is present at every Mass is a true statement The Church is not just composed of the 1 billion people living in this earth, nor are the ones inside the church assisting at Mass the only ones worshipping. At every Mass the angels saints in heaven and the Church suffering join us in worship.

I would suggest that next time you are at Mass that you pay close attention to the prefaces the priest prays before the Sanctus. The preface mentions that our voices blend in with the angels and saints in their song of praise. So, if, based on your assertion, it is questionable that they are there, why, then, would the Church ask us to blend our voices with theirs for the Sanctus?

I have read the lyrics to “Shine, Jesus, Shine”. Perhaps they are more appropriate to a retreat or an event apart from the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, but, the lyrics themselves do not lend usage of the song to the sacred liturgy.

Let All Mortal Flesh Keep Silence, which is based on the Liturgy of Saint James, is certainly more appropriate for the Mass because it fully encapsulates the sacred mysteries unfolding before us. Have you read the lyrics to Let All Mortal Flesh Keep Silence?
Let all mortal flesh keep silence,
And with fear and trembling stand;
Ponder nothing earthly minded,
For with blessing in His hand,
Christ our God to earth descendeth,
Our full homage to demand.
King of kings, yet born of Mary,
As of old on earth He stood,
Lord of lords, in human vesture,
In the body and the blood;
He will give to all the faithful
His own self for heavenly food.
Rank on rank the host of heaven
Spreads its vanguard on the way,
As the Light of light descendeth
From the realms of endless day,
That the powers of hell may vanish
As the darkness clears away.
At His feet the six wingèd seraph,
Cherubim with sleepless eye,
Veil their faces to the presence,
As with ceaseless voice they cry:
Alleluia, Alleluia
Alleluia, Lord Most High!
There is also another hymn, “Father, We Thank Thee Who Has Planted”, which is taken directly from the Didache.
Father, we thank thee who hast planted
thy holy Name within our hearts.
Knowledge and faith and life immortal
Jesus thy Son to us imparts.
Thou, Lord, didst make all for thy pleasure,
didst give us food for all our days,
giving in Christ the Bread eternal;
thine is the power, be thine the praise.
Watch o’er thy Church, O Lord, in mercy,
save it from evil, guard it still,
perfect it in thy love, unite it,
cleansed and conformed unto thy will.
As grain, once scattered on the hillsides,
was in this broken bread made one,
so from all lands thy Church be gathered
into thy Kingdom by thy Son.
The Didache, or the teaching of the Apostles, is one of the oldest records of the Church’s concerning liturgy and other matters.

What is wrong with teaching young people these hymns, hymns which bear authentic Catholic doctrine and dogma and aren’t just pop and feel-good songs?
 
Has Spirit of the Liturgy been mentioned here yet?

Ratzinger does a masterful job of arguing for the place of Gregorian chant in the liturgy over folk music.

As a former Charismatic Evangelical, it seriously irks me to hear Vineyard songs at mass. The shallowness of P&W is part of what made me re-examine my Catholic roots. But beyond that, this music is never played how it’s meant to be played when it’s at a mass. It’s supposed to be free form, spontaneous - these things don’t fit with the liturgy. So it just sounds silly. (Just like our “whitey” versions of spirituals.)

Anyhow, Benedict Gal, so cool to hear you were a former Austinite like me! I’m pretty sure I know the parish of which you speak. It has my favorite grotto. I didn’t know they changed the name of Town Lake! Amazing what can change in 3 years. St. Mary’s Cathedral, by the way, was transformational in my journey home.
 
I agree with the first, but I usually see much greater devotion to the Eucharist a youth and charismatic Masses, when recipients are fully aware of just what it means to receive the Body of Christ into their own bodies. I contrast this with so many traditional (not TLM) Masses I have attended where many sit down and talk after Communion, or rattle their rosary beads during the homily. Where is the reverence in that?

Now, I’m not saying all traditionalists are like that, or that all youth choirs (bands) are reverent, but I am saying that more contemporary music can be every bit as reverent as what some believe to be “traditional.” As I’ve said elsewhere, let’s bring back harps, lutes, and songs only in Aramaic if we want to celebrate the liturgy as the early church did.
I go to the ‘youth Mass’ in my Parish, not out of a particular choice but because I served the Mass at that time before they started a ‘youth’ Mass, and despite the fact it’s the ‘youth’ Mass there’s seldom more than one or two servers.

To give you a few examples of the things that I see each week, the group providing the music regularly traipse around the Sanctuary before and after Mass, if any of them are genuflecting or making a reverence of any description to the Eucharist reserved in the Tabernacle I certainly haven’t seen it. The same people lead a variety of hymns, almost all of which are loud. Since they have started doing the music the number of people who actually sing the hymns has decreased, the number making the responses at the Psalm has also decreased. If it can be as/more reverent than Gregorian Chant and more traditional hymns then I’ve certainly never seen it happen.

As for the reverence with which they might or might not receive Communion I can’t say for sure, my mind is on other things than their conduct at that point in the Mass. I also attend the youth group though, recently we were given the opportunity to go into groups and make up some questions to ask the Priest, one of them came up with ‘do we really believe the bread and wine are the body and blood of Christ?’. Quite how they are can be aware of what it means to receive the Body of Christ when many of them don’t even believe it is is beyond me, the question by the way was echoed by others in the group most of whom seemed to hold to the Protestant view that it was merely symbolic of the Body of Christ.

Regarding Cat’s point about songs, you might not know Latin, but I’m also betting there are a few other languages you don’t know. Either we all learn one universal language, the language of the Church, Latin or we end up going around the world hoping to find a Mass in English wherever we might be and having little to no contact with anyone outwith that narrow circle of English speaking Catholics. If you ask me whether it’s better to have one language to learn or dozens I can certainly tell you which is easiest and to me seems preferable. As for Shine Jesus Shine, for kids at a school assembly it’s a great song but there are far more appropriate hymns for the Mass, and lets remember that even those hymns are not the ideal.
 
It is MY personal opinion that of all the styles of music, rock music unites people. I recognize that it is only my personal opinion, not a fact.
Respectfully, I would ask you to consider that the very fact that the “rock music vs. traditional music” arguments rage on endlessly among Catholics is evidence that rock music in a liturgical setting is not unitive, but ultimately very divisive. I think rock music is indeed unitive among certain Protestant sects, but that this is not the case among Catholics, and as long as we have access to the great musical heritage of the Church that developed over the 1900 years prior to the invention of rock music, it will continue to be divisive.
 
I wanted to chime in (again).

I recently was blessed with the ability to attend Mass at Our Lady of Atonement in San Antonio. My DH (Protestant-raised) is never all that fond of attending Mass with me, especially since most of the songs are “so [darned] hard to sing” and it’s “boring”.

Well, imagine my surprise when 1) he sang all the songs (“chants really make it easy to participate!”) and 2) couldn’t stop talking about how different Mass was (“it was like nothing you experience outside Church!”).

All I could think was “Well, duh! Mass is supposed to be Heaven on Earth- how else could we transcend the secular and enter into Heaven if we are tying ourselves to the world???”
 
As for LifeTeen-

This is from “The Pope’s New Youth Mass” by Jeffery Tucker
Meanwhile, there is the persistent problem that many parishes that some Sunday Mass has been set aside as the Mass designed to appeal to the youth. Ironically, it is precisely these Masses that are most open to reform in the direction the Benedict XVI is calling for—much more so that the main Sunday Mass. These are the Masses where a dignified ordinary setting can be used, either in Latin or English. The new schola can sing propers, again in either Latin or English. They should be encouraged to sing all music without instruments, as a way of clearing the air, encouraging participation, and emphasizing a core truth that the primary liturgical instrument is not the guitar or piano or even organ but the human voice itself. The celebrant can do his part by singing the parts of the Mass that belong to him. The Mass can be said ad orientem and use incense and bells, all of which today’s youth find intriguing precisely because these symbols of holiness are not available in the secular world. Here we have the basis of a new Youth Mass, and perhaps the approach of this Mass will have a meritorious influence on the other Masses of the parish.
The goal of such a reform is not to appeal to a certain demographic but to use an opportunity presented by the existence of such Mass times to institute a new pattern of liturgical use that defers to the tradition and puts a premium on the idea of sacred space. What we find in such spaces is something completely unlike what the rest of the world offers: actions designed to reach outside the passage of time and into eternity. Here we should find a form of beauty for which the world itself offers no parallel. To attend Mass and be part of this mystical action is a privilege of the highest order. It can be offered to today’s youth so that they can be part of something much larger and infinitely greater than their own times and their own generation.
And a poem from a student to his priest:
A Student’s Plea

No, no, Father, please don’t toss the mike
like a DJ when you preach. Please don’t be cool.
Please don’t ride a Harley motorbike
when you come to school.

Don’t wear red cowboy boots for Pentecost,
and tell dumb jokes to be our pal. Please don’t ‘high five’,
say, “Sweet!” “Awwsome!” “You suck!” “You’re toast!”
or teach us how to jive.

Don’t sing along to the latest pop band;
you don’t need to be hip and up to date,
or come to our parties with a drink in your hand,
trying to relate.

Play it straight. Say the black and do the red.
Refrain from politics and rainbow pins.
Pray for all of us, the living and the dead,
and listen to our sins.

We want you to keep the faith, you see,
but keep it as it was. We want it old.
We want it to be waiting there when we
come in from the cold.

We want you to be our Father, not our mate.
We want a solid rock; so when we roam,
we know you’ll be there, waiting at the gate,
to welcome us home.
 
actrually, Cat, the notion that the entire Church is present at every Mass is a true statement The Church is not just composed of the 1 billion people living in this earth, nor are the ones inside the church assisting at Mass the only ones worshipping. At every Mass the angels saints in heaven and the Church suffering join us in worship.

I would suggest that next time you are at Mass that you pay close attention to the prefaces the priest prays before the Sanctus. The preface mentions that our voices blend in with the angels and saints in their song of praise. So, if, based on your assertion, it is questionable that they are there, why, then, would the Church ask us to blend our voices with theirs for the Sanctus?

I have read the lyrics to “Shine, Jesus, Shine”. Perhaps they are more appropriate to a retreat or an event apart from the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, but, the lyrics themselves do not lend usage of the song to the sacred liturgy.

Let All Mortal Flesh Keep Silence, which is based on the Liturgy of Saint James, is certainly more appropriate for the Mass because it fully encapsulates the sacred mysteries unfolding before us. Have you read the lyrics to Let All Mortal Flesh Keep Silence?

There is also another hymn, “Father, We Thank Thee Who Has Planted”, which is taken directly from the Didache.

The Didache, or the teaching of the Apostles, is one of the oldest records of the Church’s concerning liturgy and other matters.

**What is wrong with teaching young people these hymns, hymns which bear authentic Catholic doctrine and dogma and aren’t just pop and feel-good songs?/**QUOTE]

Nothing’s wrong with teaching young people traditional Catholic hymns.

Here’s a question for some of you. A Catholic Church offers a traditional Mass. A few teens come. The same church offers a reverent LifeTeen Mass, with none of the hoo-hah that some of you have witnessed at Life Teen Masses. Hundreds of teens and their parents come.

This is a real-life scenario, BTW. What do you think should be done? Dump the Life Teen Mass and embark upon a campaign to get the hundreds of teenagers interested in Traditional Mass? How would you do this? What do you say to parents who tell you that their kids will only attend Life Teen Mass?

My opinion is–offer the Traditional Mass for those who prefer it, and offer the Life Teen mass for those who prefer it. Keep all Masses reverent and follow the rubrics. If you don’t like a certain Mass, then don’t go to it unless you are forced to by a whacky schedule.
 
Nothing’s wrong with teaching young people traditional Catholic hymns.

Here’s a question for some of you. A Catholic Church offers a traditional Mass. A few teens come. The same church offers a reverent LifeTeen Mass, with none of the hoo-hah that some of you have witnessed at Life Teen Masses. Hundreds of teens and their parents come.

This is a real-life scenario, BTW. What do you think should be done? Dump the Life Teen Mass and embark upon a campaign to get the hundreds of teenagers interested in Traditional Mass? How would you do this? What do you say to parents who tell you that their kids will only attend Life Teen Mass?

My opinion is–offer the Traditional Mass for those who prefer it, and offer the Life Teen mass for those who prefer it. Keep all Masses reverent and follow the rubrics. If you don’t like a certain Mass, then don’t go to it unless you are forced to by a whacky schedule.
Actually, if you re-read the posts in this thread, many of the ones coming from the younger crowd indicate that they would rather have music that is solidly grounded in Church teaching and tradition and that is truly sacred as opposed to the rock genre that is currently offered today. They want something out of the ordinary because they perceive that Something greater than themselves is there. They want to be enveloped and enfolded into that sacred mystery. The P&W stuff just doesn’t work for that because it comes from a style of worship that is not at all based on the Holy Sacrifice by only in the Word. It is not conducive to appropriate liturgical worship.

Incidentally, if you noticed at the Australian WYD Mass that the Holy Father celebrated, noen of the P&W stuff was used. We didn’t hear “Lord, I Lift Your Name on High” nor was “Shine, Jesus, Shine” performed. The music, for the most part, was rooted in tradition. While the settings for the parts of the Mass may have been a tad operatic and performance driven, it wasn’t pop culture. It was more along the lines of Pope culture.

Young people are craving a sense of the divine, a sense of something greater than themselves. The pop and rock genre doesn’t offer that. I believe one of the posters asked if the Holy Fahter’s book, Spirit of the Liturgy was referenced. It probably was, about a dozen or so pages ago on this thread. But, it bears repeating when he notes that:
Then there are two developments in music itself that have their origins primarily in the West but that for a long time have affected the whole of mankind in the world culture that is being formed. Modern so-called “classical” music has maneuvered itself, with some exceptions, into an elitist ghetto, which only specialists may enter – and even they do so with what may sometimes be mixed feelings. The music of the masses has broken loose from this and treads a very different path.
On the one hand, **there is pop music, which is certainly no longer supported by the people in the ancient sense (populus). It is aimed at the phenomenon of the masses, is industrially produced, and ultimately has to be described as a cult of the banal. "**B]Rock", on the other hand, is the expression of elemental passions, and at rock festivals it assumes a cultic character, a form of worship, in fact, in opposition to Christian worship.
People are, so to speak, released from themselves by the emotional shock of rhythm, noise, and special lighting effects. However, in the ecstasy of having all their defenses torn down, the participants sink, as it were, beneath the elemental force of the universe. The music of the Holy Spirit’s sober inebriation seems to have little chance when self has become a prison, the mind is a shackle, and breaking out from both appears as a true promise of redemption that can be tasted at least for a few moments.

The Holy Father has pretty much describvd, in the passages highlighted in red and dark blue, a lot of the style of performance for the P&W music used in these so-called Youth Masses. He doesn’t call it by name, but the descriptions fit the bill. In fact, the Fathers of the 2005 Synod on the Eucharist echoed this same concerned when they deemed such music “problematic.”
 
Respectfully, I would ask you to consider that the very fact that the “rock music vs. traditional music” arguments rage on endlessly among Catholics is evidence that rock music in a liturgical setting is not unitive, but ultimately very divisive. I think rock music is indeed unitive among certain Protestant sects, but that this is not the case among Catholics, and as long as we have access to the great musical heritage of the Church that developed over the 1900 years prior to the invention of rock music, it will continue to be divisive.
This sounds like a reason that music, period, is divisive, not unitive. Why reading the Bible is divisive, not unitive. As I’m sure you’re aware, many people have gotten the opinion that, by their observations, religion itself is divisive, not unitive! They would point out that if the Catholic Church were so unitive, there wouldn’t be Protestants in the first place! It’s like the private school that brags that their discipline record is better than the public school of the town, ignoring the fact that the public school gets stuck with all the students that the private school expelled!

What is called “rock” when it comes to liturgical music includes a very broad genre of music. Some of it is reflective and appropriate for prayer. Some of it is so agitated as to be arguably inappropriate as a background for any civilized activity. (That’s just the music, forget the lyrics.) But then, I don’t think I’d want the first movement of Beethoven’s 5th played during Mass, either, or Liszt’s Totentanz (based on Dies Irae, but definitely not worship music! 😉 ), or any number of classical pieces.
I’m a teen - and while I have no problem with life night I wouldn’t recommend a “teen mass”. Instead of praise and worship music, try some tradition. Try getting the choir or maybe just one cantor to sing the Kyrie in Greek, the Sanctus in Latin, and the Agnus Dei in Latin. If it is Sunday a Gloria in Latin as well.

You can view the Kyriale Romanum here.

Catholig
Now here you are hitting the nail on the head. Youth don’t want music with words that praise but a tempo that sounds like a dirge…but who does? That doesn’t mean it takes a snare drum to lure them in. This is an age where a person has had just about enough of “the kid’s table”, both at Thanksgiving and at church. A Mass for young people should be of the highest quality, especially the music.

This is a idealistic and active time of life, too. Young adults don’t want to sit around and accomplish nothing. I’m wondering if the answer isn’t to a) give young people credit for being the most able-bodied and energetic people in the parish, and helping them find and do what suitably substantial thing they want to accomplish and b) realize that this is a time when we start needing a real adult spirituality, with a real adult prayer life. This is when life is getting more complicated, not less. They need permission to want more depth, not less…but with the understanding that within that, they can choose and organize what they want to do. They aren’t little kids any more.

The main thing, though, is to not sell them short, to not even let them sell each other short. That is insulting.
 
As a youth minister running Life Teen in a parish… i wish to hear from you as to what your thoughts are if you have experienced a Teen mass or life nights? What about the idea of modern praise and worship music in a mass and during the Eucharistic Prayer having youth around the altar?
I just started doing research on lifeteen because I’m trying to become a youth minister in my parish. So far it looks sketchy. I attended a lifeteen mass at a nearby parish that made me very uncomfortable. It seemed to be too dramatized and less holy and sacred. Afterward, I attended a youth group meeting which seemed actually really great. It looks like it could be good as long as it doesn’t get it’s fingers too much into the mass and benediction/adoration. Modern praise and worship music is beautiful…but doesn’t seem worthy for mass.
 
Actually, if you re-read the posts in this thread, many of the ones coming from the younger crowd indicate that they would rather have music that is solidly grounded in Church teaching and tradition and that is truly sacred as opposed to the rock genre that is currently offered today. They want something out of the ordinary because they perceive that Something greater than themselves is there. They want to be enveloped and enfolded into that sacred mystery. The P&W stuff just doesn’t work for that because it comes from a style of worship that is not at all based on the Holy Sacrifice by only in the Word. It is not conducive to appropriate liturgical worship.

Incidentally, if you noticed at the Australian WYD Mass that the Holy Father celebrated, noen of the P&W stuff was used. We didn’t hear “Lord, I Lift Your Name on High” nor was “Shine, Jesus, Shine” performed. The music, for the most part, was rooted in tradition. While the settings for the parts of the Mass may have been a tad operatic and performance driven, it wasn’t pop culture. It was more along the lines of Pope culture.

Young people are craving a sense of the divine, a sense of something greater than themselves. The pop and rock genre doesn’t offer that. I believe one of the posters asked if the Holy Fahter’s book, Spirit of the Liturgy was referenced. It probably was, about a dozen or so pages ago on this thread. But, it bears repeating when he notes that:

The Holy Father has pretty much describvd, in the passages highlighted in red and dark blue, a lot of the style of performance for the P&W music used in these so-called Youth Masses. He doesn’t call it by name, but the descriptions fit the bill. In fact, the Fathers of the 2005 Synod on the Eucharist echoed this same concerned when they deemed such music “problematic.”
You’re making some huge generalizations about teenagers and young people (and boomers, too–a lot people my age do not enjoy “traditional” music).

I hardly think that the teenagers who post in the Traditional Section of Catholic Answers Forums are representative of the broad spectrum of teenagers. Try Face Book.

The scenario that I described is real, in my city, at my parish.

We HAVE a TLM in our city (and have had one for years), and it is not populated with large crowds of teenagers and their families. OTOH, the LifeTeen Mass is quite full, usually standing room only, and many of the attendees are teenagers and young people.

So apparently not all young people crave the ancient.

Yes, there are teenagers who like traditional and ancient music. I have not suggested that we get rid of traditional music in Mass. What I am saying is that as long as Life Teen Mass is reverent and done according to the rubrics, it should be done. It provides a great draw for many teenagers who are NOT interested in Traditional music, and who have gotten to a place in their families where their parents can’t or won’t just say, “You go to Mass because I say so!”

And as I said, I have no problem teens learning the ancient music. But how practically, other than in Catholic school music class, which I believe is usually an elective at the junior high and high school level. Perhaps in the elementary schools? Well, our large and thriving Catholic school just hired the best music teacher they could find who was interested in the job, and she definitely doesn’t teach ancient music to children.

Right now, I am accompanist for two projects in our city. Mozart’s Requiem Mass and Handel’s Messiah. Both are offered to Catholics; in fact, our Cathedral’s music director is producing the Mozart Mass. There are teenagers involved, but very few. I think most of them prefer to be part of teenaged activities.

We do have a world-renowned boys’ choir in our city, and this is extremely popular, but they do a mix of music, and it costs a fortune to be part of (they do international tours). But even thought a certain group of teenaged boys wants to be part of it, it’s definitely not turning away
hundreds or even dozens of auditioners.

I am chair of a classical music competition in my city. The “Vocal” Division is available for 9th-12th grades and college through age 25. These Divisions are very small. The voice teachers in the area tell us that teenagers simply aren’t interested in learning the classics. They want to be Mariah Carey or Kelly Clarkson.

Again, I’m not saying that teenagers are never interested in the classics and tradition. Of course there are “classical” teens–I know them. However, they are quite unusua compared to the teenagers who prefer rock music, even in church.

I believe, based on personal experience with Life Teen Mass and also in Protestant churches, that most teenagers are NOT interested in Traditions. And rather than seeing them avoid Mass and start going to the very lively Protestant megachurches in our city featuring very talented rock bands (not pop), I would rather see a Life Teen Mass available for these Catholic teenagers. Yes, of course, it’s pretty lame rock compared to the Protestant churches. But it’s rock and to many teens, that’s the only kind of music.

I do think that many teenagers grow into more traditional styles of music and develop broader tastes in music and Mass as they grow in their faith and grow up in their bodies and minds. But there’s nothing wrong with having a "teenaged "faith and enjoying “teenaged music” and “teenaged life.” After all, that’s what they are–teenagers.

I’m going to repeat it again–I’m NOT saying that all the traditions and traditional music should be trashed. There are teenagers who do prefer this.
 
Do I still count as a young person at 24?
Yes, of course you are a “young” person. But no, you are not a teenager, which is the topic of this thread Llife TEEN Mass. Life TEEN Mass is designed to appeal to TEENS, not 20-somethings. There are many people who are not teens who like Life Teen Mass (I’m 51, a boomer). But the fact remains–the program “Life Teen” is for teenagers.

There is a huge difference between a 13-year-old and a 24-year-old.

Generally speaking (and I do mean GENERALLY!), many 13-year-olds and even older teenagers do not possess the ability to think abstractly. A recent study of algebra has made this clear–not all teenagers are ready for abstract thinking. However, most 24-year-olds are capable of thinking abstractly.

I personally think this could explain why teenagers don’t “get” many traditional hymns, which are loaded with imagery. Some of those simplistic “fluffy” contemporary songs that many of you condemn are actually very appropriate for a teenager who truly doesn’t understand “higher” music.

(There are teens who CAN think abstractly. If you are one of these, great. But you can’t expect all your peers to be at the same place you are, right? Just like some teenaged girls have a bosom and others are flat. We all develop differently.)

There are many others differences. Most 24-year-olds have made their peace with the families and other authority figures and have passed through the “rebellious” growing up stage. However, many teenagers are “rebelling” one way or another. Not all are into drugs and sex, but many teenagers are “breaking away” from their parents and experiencing conflict at home.

Most 24-year-olds are working and live on their own, not at home. Yes, more and more are staying home because it’s cheaper. But most still have left home and live separate lives from their parents. However, most teenagers are still dependant on their parents for food, shelter, and other basics.

Most 24-year-olds have come to terms with the necessity of working to earn a living. They have given up dreams of being wealthy without working at a regular job. However, teenagers still have dreams and hopes, and many have not internalized the relationship between “money” and “job.”

Many 24-year-olds have education beyond high school, either technical or college. Many have military experience. Most teenagers are still in high school.

Most 24-year-olds have started to broaden their horizons a little and have more eclectic tastes in fashion, music, entertainment, leisure time, etc. Most teenagers are “peer-driven”; i.e., they make selections based on what their friends are doing.

Many 24-year-olds are working on life relationships. They either date seriously, wish they were dating seriously, or are working through the decision to answer a call to singleness. But most teenagers are still dating “for fun” or “for something to do” and of course, for sex.

Most 24-year-olds realize that they are not the center of the universe. But many teenagers are still very much inwardly-focused, as they try to grow up and figure out who they are and how they fit into the world. (This is NORMAL, BTW.)

I could list many more differences. The fact is, there is a huge difference between you and teens.
 
Actually, I never brought up the TLM in my recent posts. That is not a bone of contention here. What is at the heart of this discussion, of late, is the music.

As I said in my previous thread, if you read what many of those who are in the targeted age group have posted, you will find a strong preference for Traditional, Sacred music and not the P&W stuff that is performed at Mass.

P&W may be fine for a rally, but, it does not fit the solemnity and dignity of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Very few, if any, of these songs focus on the sacred mysteries that unfold before us at every Mass.
 
This sounds like a reason that music, period, is divisive, not unitive. Why reading the Bible is divisive, not unitive. As I’m sure you’re aware, many people have gotten the opinion that, by their observations, religion itself is divisive, not unitive! They would point out that if the Catholic Church were so unitive, there wouldn’t be Protestants in the first place! It’s like the private school that brags that their discipline record is better than the public school of the town, ignoring the fact that the public school gets stuck with all the students that the private school expelled!

What is called “rock” when it comes to liturgical music includes a very broad genre of music. Some of it is reflective and appropriate for prayer. Some of it is so agitated as to be arguably inappropriate as a background for any civilized activity. (That’s just the music, forget the lyrics.) But then, I don’t think I’d want the first movement of Beethoven’s 5th played during Mass, either, or Liszt’s Totentanz (based on Dies Irae, but definitely not worship music! 😉 ), or any number of classical pieces.

Now here you are hitting the nail on the head. Youth don’t want music with words that praise but a tempo that sounds like a dirge…but who does? That doesn’t mean it takes a snare drum to lure them in. This is an age where a person has had just about enough of “the kid’s table”, both at Thanksgiving and at church. A Mass for young people should be of the highest quality, especially the music.
What is unitive though, for Catholics at least, is surely what the Church has said on it? The guidelines that are set are often ignored or simply neglected by Parishes, and we often have the same people wheeling out the one or two verses in the Bible where drums are mentioned as a justification for having a drum kit set up to play rock music during the Mass. I wouldn’t say that the standard teen Mass follows those guidelines, indeed they probably follow them even less than in most Parishes. It’s been brought up before but at least one survey conducted in America has shown that teens of almost all faiths and none have a preference for traditional scared music (hymns, chant etc) over other genres which they consider less suitable.

Shouldn’t all Masses be of the highest possible quality in every regard? (And not so much for the congregation).
 
What is unitive though, for Catholics at least, is surely what the Church has said on it? The guidelines that are set are often ignored or simply neglected by Parishes, and we often have the same people wheeling out the one or two verses in the Bible where drums are mentioned as a justification for having a drum kit set up to play rock music during the Mass…

Shouldn’t all Masses be of the highest possible quality in every regard? (And not so much for the congregation).
Yes:
All Masses should be of the highest possible quality in every regard.

That the Bible mentions the use of drums and cymbals to praise God does not imply that drums belong at Mass. Let us hope that Mass is not the only time during the week that we praise God. Even if one were to concede the use of drums, that would not make every type of performance on a drum suitable for worship.

Nevertheless, there is music played on stations that call themselves “all rock” which is not the throbbing, agitated stuff that the Church has declared unsuitable for Mass. It is a big genre. It is theoretically possible to compose music that would be simultaneously considered “rock” and “liturgical”, just as it is possible to compose music that is both “classical” in style and yet not remotely liturgical.
Yes, of course you are a “young” person. But no, you are not a teenager, which is the topic of this thread Llife TEEN Mass. Life TEEN Mass is designed to appeal to TEENS, not 20-somethings. There are many people who are not teens who like Life Teen Mass (I’m 51, a boomer). But the fact remains–the program “Life Teen” is for teenagers.

There is a huge difference between a 13-year-old and a 24-year-old.

Generally speaking (and I do mean GENERALLY!), many 13-year-olds and even older teenagers do not possess the ability to think abstractly. A recent study of algebra has made this clear–not all teenagers are ready for abstract thinking. However, most 24-year-olds are capable of thinking abstractly.

I personally think this could explain why teenagers don’t “get” many traditional hymns, which are loaded with imagery. Some of those simplistic “fluffy” contemporary songs that many of you condemn are actually very appropriate for a teenager who truly doesn’t understand “higher” music.

(There are teens who CAN think abstractly. If you are one of these, great. But you can’t expect all your peers to be at the same place you are, right? Just like some teenaged girls have a bosom and others are flat. We all develop differently.)

There are many others differences. Most 24-year-olds have made their peace with the families and other authority figures and have passed through the “rebellious” growing up stage. However, many teenagers are “rebelling” one way or another. Not all are into drugs and sex, but many teenagers are “breaking away” from their parents and experiencing conflict at home.

Most 24-year-olds are working and live on their own, not at home. Yes, more and more are staying home because it’s cheaper. But most still have left home and live separate lives from their parents. However, most teenagers are still dependant on their parents for food, shelter, and other basics.

Most 24-year-olds have come to terms with the necessity of working to earn a living. They have given up dreams of being wealthy without working at a regular job. However, teenagers still have dreams and hopes, and many have not internalized the relationship between “money” and “job.”

Many 24-year-olds have education beyond high school, either technical or college. Many have military experience. Most teenagers are still in high school.

Most 24-year-olds have started to broaden their horizons a little and have more eclectic tastes in fashion, music, entertainment, leisure time, etc. Most teenagers are “peer-driven”; i.e., they make selections based on what their friends are doing.

Many 24-year-olds are working on life relationships. They either date seriously, wish they were dating seriously, or are working through the decision to answer a call to singleness. But most teenagers are still dating “for fun” or “for something to do” and of course, for sex.

Most 24-year-olds realize that they are not the center of the universe. But many teenagers are still very much inwardly-focused, as they try to grow up and figure out who they are and how they fit into the world. (This is NORMAL, BTW.)

I could list many more differences. The fact is, there is a huge difference between you and teens.
That it is normal for us to have some particular attitude or misconception about our place in the universe does not mean that Mass should be changed around to accomodate that misconception.

The misconceptions you list are exactly the misconceptions that lead to unhappiness. They are the misconceptions Jesus came to challenge. Sadly enough, they are not misconceptions that go away when one reaches their twenties. These are the misconceptions that people hang onto long enough to have a one type of big fat ugly mid-life crisis. (There are others.)

The truth is, there is good in the teen years that is too often lost. A lot of teenagers still have a willingness to be radically committed to an ideal, a willingness that is too often put away when one reaches a “sensible” age.

As for the ability to think abstractly, it is not an ability one just magically gets. You have to practice it. You may as well think that an uncoordinated child will magically become coordinated if they are simply excused from PE for a few more years. The PE classes need to recognize that not everybody is cut out for varsity sports, but they also need to recognize that exercising and developing the aptitudes we do have at our current level is a generalized need.
 
40.png
Cat:
The Pope spoke to young people at the WYD, I suppose he was making huge generalisations with every comment though.

With respect Cat I think the teenagers who post in any part of this site are more representative of teenagers growing up in the Church and attending Mass than a baby boomer who has had vastly different experiences to most Catholic teenagers.

You keep trying to bring this back to your Diocese, one out of however many the Church has, and where your Bishop made very valid comments about the “dreck” too often played at Mass.

In my Diocese there are no TLMs, there is one on a Sunday morning in the neighboring Archdiocese. However as the trains don’t run to that area on Sundays and I don’t have a car or driver’s license it’s not possible to attend it. I also hold rather stubbornly to the view that as I already attend a Parish of the Latin Rite that it should be possible to attend either the Ordinary or Extraordinary form without having to traipse half way across the city to get to Mass, which appears to be what Pope Benedict hopes for as well eventually.

I think you’ve said previously that you don’t attend the TLM, how would you know how many teenagers attend? In addition is it likely to be at a time when most teenagers will be able to get there? A Mass being full is not always an indication of how worthwhile it is, some controversial Priests get a very large following despite verging on the heretical at times. An evening Mass tends to be at a good time for most teenagers to get to, similarly if their friends are going to be there they’re more likely to go. And that’s leaving aside the fact that it could be quite obvious to their friends if they didn’t attend, I think there’s enough problems already without having peer pressure on which time we attend Mass as well.

So apparently because of some factor teenagers prefer going to one Mass in their local Parish where they’ve grown up/where their friend’s are rather than going to another Mass in a Parish somewhere else in town where they’re likely to know relatively few people and where they’ll probably be a bit lost until they get use to the different Form. Your statements don’t follow one another, just because teenagers go to a particular Mass doesn’t mean they somehow like the liturgy far more than another. I don’t think anyone has said that everyone below 20 loves the TLM and wants Gregorian Chant, what we can say is that the available evidence and responses indicates the majority of young people prefer a more traditional approach than their parents did at their age and quite often do now.

Young people are aware when they are targeted with a cheap gimmick to pack the pews. I’d far rather hear about a Parish offering a decent programme of Catechism/lectures about the Faith than a youth Mass where they get to see some of their mates strumming guitar up front, then again I suppose I’m one of those frightfully abnormal teenagers who think there should be more of an emphasis on the substance of the Mass then on the music.

These same children somehow learnt the “dreck” which is so often sung at Mass without necessarily going to a Catholic school. Chant is not rocket science, it’s just as possible to pick it up over time attending Mass as Shine, Jesus, Shine or any other hymn.

Does that surprise you? Most teenage boys have quite enough problems to deal without adding in the fact they sing in a boys’ choir. Apart from anything else after a boy’s voice has broken it takes a while to settle, become accustomed to it and extend the range a bit, even then it can take years for the voice to gain more depth and power.

Local music festival doesn’t have kids breaking down the doors to sing… hardly seems like headline making news. A lot of people while happy singing, taking singing lessons, doing exams and being a member of choirs would still hate to sing in front of an audience solo. Children emulate what they hear, if the only music they know/know well is Mariah Carey then we can hardly expect them to be demanding to sing pieces they’ve never heard. It is part of a music teachers job to teach a range of music across different periods and genres.

The Catholic Church is not a Protestant church. The majority of your ‘experience’ comes from that background, which very few Catholic teenagers have. The Church has far better to offer than some watered down version of the entertainment at a Protestant mega church. As I’ve said previously the Church cannot compete on this arena if it comes down to following whatever trends pop culture might follow.

And please stop being so patronising, the faith which Catholic teenagers have is the same Catholic Faith which has been handed down since the time of the Apostles. If we are going to Mass it is to participate in our Catholic Faith, it would be nice if we could have Catholic music, and hear about the example from Scripture of how to lead a Catholic life rather than whatever music was written back in the 60s, which was also probably the last time it was popular to mainstream teenagers, if it ever was, and some homily which is often low on substance. Look at the reaction Pope Benedict got at WYD, Homilies should be challenging, the Mass, and every part of it, should be an invitation to grow and deepen involvement in the Faith, superficial music and liturgy doesn’t do that do that.
 
hi my name is maryam 16 years old
my parents are muslim and i’m forced to be like them even if i dont believe in islam…they’e so strict on me as a teenager and they never give me their trust…i feel no body cares about me…i really dont believe in islam,my heart tells me to be a christien but i dont know anything about christiens i want you to help me please…and tell me about everything you do and believe in, tell me about jesus…and what should i do so i can be catholic.??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top