Literal or Symbolic?...

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_GreyPilgrim
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jesus is God. God can be more than one place at the same time.

To quote St. Augustine:

“How this ‘And he was carried in his own hands’] should be understood literally of David, we cannot discover; but we can discover how it is meant of Christ. FOR CHRIST WAS CARRIED IN HIS OWN HANDS, WHEN, REFERRING TO HIS OWN BODY, HE SAID: ‘THIS IS MY BODY.’ FOR HE CARRIED THAT BODY IN HIS HANDS.” (Psalms 33:1:10)
Careful, for some said Augustine was a switch hitter, batting from both sides of this plate .He said by believing we eat, “leave your teeth and bellies behind”. The bible also says we are His temple, and does not allude to RP as Him getting inside us . He tabernacles in us by regeneration, by faith, the gift of God.
 
Careful ,for some said Augustine was a switch hitter , batting from both sides of this plate .He said by believing we eat ,“leave your teeth and bellies behind”. The bible also says we are His temple,and does not allude to RP as Him getting inside us .He tabernacles in us by regeneration ,by faith ,the gift of God.
Augustine was quite clear regarding his belief in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist.

I think the bible is quite explicit:

John 6
53Jesus said to them, “I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. 55For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink.

More from St. Augustine:
Code:
"That Bread which you see on the altar, having been sanctified by the word of God IS THE BODY OF CHRIST. That chalice, or rather, what is in that chalice, having been sanctified by the word of God, IS THE BLOOD OF CHRIST. Through that bread and wine the Lord Christ willed to commend HIS BODY AND BLOOD, WHICH HE POURED OUT FOR US UNTO THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS." (Sermons 227)

"The Lord Jesus wanted those whose eyes were held lest they should recognize him, to recognize Him in the breaking of the bread [Luke 24:16,30-35]. The faithful know what I am saying. They know Christ in the breaking of the bread. For not all bread, but only that which receives the blessing of Christ, BECOMES CHRIST'S BODY." (Sermons 234:2)

"What you see is the bread and the chalice; that is what your own eyes report to you. But what your faith obliges you to accept is that THE BREAD IS THE BODY OF CHRIST AND THE CHALICE [WINE] THE BLOOD OF CHRIST." (Sermons 272)

"How this 'And he was carried in his own hands'] should be understood literally of David, we cannot discover; but we can discover how it is meant of Christ. FOR CHRIST WAS CARRIED IN HIS OWN HANDS, WHEN, REFERRING TO HIS OWN BODY, HE SAID: 'THIS IS MY BODY.' FOR HE CARRIED THAT BODY IN HIS HANDS." (Psalms 33:1:10)

"Was not Christ IMMOLATED only once in His very Person? In the Sacrament, nevertheless, He is IMMOLATED for the people not only on every Easter Solemnity but on every day; and a man would not be lying if, when asked, he were to reply that Christ is being IMMOLATED." (Letters 98:9)

"Christ is both the Priest, OFFERING Himself, and Himself the Victim. He willed that the SACRAMENTAL SIGN of this should be the daily Sacrifice of the Church, who, since the Church is His body and He the Head, learns to OFFER herself through Him." (City of God 10:20)

"By those sacrifices of the Old Law, this one Sacrifice is signified, in which there is a true remission of sins; but not only is no one forbidden to take as food the Blood of this Sacrifice, rather, all who wish to possess life are exhorted to drink thereof." (Questions on the Heptateuch 3:57)

"Nor can it be denied that the souls of the dead find relief through the piety of their friends and relatives who are still alive, when the Sacrifice of the Mediator is OFFERED for them, or when alms are given in the church." (Ench Faith, Hope, Love 29:110)

"But by the prayers of the Holy Church, and by the SALVIFIC SACRIFICE, and by the alms which are given for their spirits, there is no doubt that the dead are aided that the Lord might deal more mercifully with them than their sins would deserve. FOR THE WHOLE CHURCH OBSERVES THIS PRACTICE WHICH WAS HANDED DOWN BY THE FATHERS that it prays for those who have died in the communion of the Body and Blood of Christ, when they are commemorated in their own place in the Sacrifice itself; and the Sacrifice is OFFERED also in memory of them, on their behalf. If, the works of mercy are celebrated for the sake of those who are being remembered, who would hesitate to recommend them, on whose behalf prayers to God are not offered in vain? It is not at all to be doubted that such prayers are of profit to the dead; but for such of them as lived before their death in a way that makes it possible for these things to be useful to them after death." (Sermons 172:2)

"...I turn to Christ, because it is He whom I seek here; and I discover how the earth is adored without impiety, how without impiety the footstool of His feet is adored. For He received earth from earth; because flesh is from the earth, and He took flesh from the flesh of Mary. He walked here in the same flesh, AND GAVE US THE SAME FLESH TO BE EATEN UNTO SALVATION. BUT NO ONE EATS THAT FLESH UNLESS FIRST HE ADORES IT; and thus it is discovered how such a footstool of the Lord's feet is adored; AND NOT ONLY DO WE NOT SIN BY ADORING, WE DO SIN BY NOT ADORING." (Psalms 98:9)
philvaz.com/apologetics/num30.htm
 
Uh oh…Call the Pope, I think you guys got this one wrong. It just hit me…When Jesus was on Earth, he took the bread, broke it and said "take, eat, this is my body, broken for you. And poured the wine and said Take, drink, this is my blood, shed for you for the forgiveness of sin. He passed around bread and wine. He didn’t hack off one of his limbs and pass it around. It was symbolic. See. Will somebody call the Pope and let him know, you got it all wrong. Gimme the number, I’ll call him!😃
So which part of “This IS my body”, “This IS my blood” that you did not understand?
 
I am sorry ,I thought you said the apostles ,who remained ,took it literally. It is inferred that “many” disciples murmured and said it was a hard saying ,and left -“many” .Then he turned to the “12”. There is no indication that the 12 murmured or said it was a hard saying.
When they were asked if they will leave too , their answer did not indicate that they believed contrary to what the others believed. They were Jews same as those who have been following Jesus but left. They did not get Jesus either that is why all they could say was “To whom shall we go?’ That’s like saying if there is any other credible Rabbi out there they would have given it a shot. But the thing is they knew that Jesus had the “words of eternal life”.

Some equate this scene to Peter’s confession of faith in Matthew 16. Jesus had the words of eternal life so no matter how hard this is they are keeping with Him.
I imagine in any culture it is not good to say" eat my flesh".That doesn’t limit the possibilities of it’s figurative use , unless you want to limit God’s use of speech .Shall I say, as CC does on RP, that God can do it and does do it( RP) ,that God can speak figuratively here,and does ?(you know ,because He can , He did ). It is just as possible for it to be figurative,even with your good point, as to say He was speaking of RP, that would take another 1200 years to finally define as transubstantiation…Again ,the intention was twofold :elucidate Himself to the believers ,and to "blind " the unbelievers. "Eat my flesh " was perfect language ,accomplishing both.The unbelievers left ,from following Jesus in the flesh ) ,and the believers beautifully confessed, “you have the words of eternal life ,and art the Son of God”. RP is not in this context.
Eat my flesh is simply that. Eat my flash. If Jesus was speaking figuratively, He would have been speaking figuratively in the manner of the Jews of His time. And the figurative meaning is the one I have already explained. So no, it definitely IS not figurative .

Secondly, as I have explained the apostles would have passed on their understanding of this to their successors. These first successors have taught the RP. So if you want to know how the apostles understood it, ask the Church that was founded on them.
 
Uh oh…Call the Pope, I think you guys got this one wrong. It just hit me…When Jesus was on Earth, he took the bread, broke it and said "take, eat, this is my body, broken for you. And poured the wine and said Take, drink, this is my blood, shed for you for the forgiveness of sin. He passed around bread and wine. He didn’t hack off one of his limbs and pass it around. It was symbolic. See. Will somebody call the Pope and let him know, you got it all wrong. Gimme the number, I’ll call him!😃
Who is it?
Some guy named rturner, you know that Catholic Answers forum?
Why is he calling me?
Says he wants you to know about his opinion on the Eucharist?
Ich bete für ihn, aber erkläre ihm, daß dieses bereits mit dem Methodists besprochen worden ist
Your holiness, I don’t know if he understands German,
Well then tell him to go to this website and see if he can do as I asked the other Wesleyans…

cliftondiocese.com/assets/media/churches_aug.pdf

From their side, Catholics acknowledge the commitment of Methodism to holiness and to the connectional understanding and practice of Church. They recognise the emphasis common to both traditions upon ‘responsible grace’. They accept that they can learn much from Methodism about the value of Scriptural devotion, hymnody and lay ministry. They believe that they can find inspiration in the example of the Wesleys. They commend to Methodists a re-examination of many of the issues that were divisive at the Reformation and subsequently, such as the nature of eucharistic sacrifice, priesthood and the issue of ‘absolute confidence in Christ’s work through the ministry of word and sacrament’.

Ok, your holiness, we’ll tell him
Oh yeah, next time he calls tell him to ask an Apologist:thumbsup:
 
Uh oh…Call the Pope, I think you guys got this one wrong. It just hit me…When Jesus was on Earth, he took the bread, broke it and said "take, eat, this is my body, broken for you. And poured the wine and said Take, drink, this is my blood, shed for you for the forgiveness of sin. He passed around bread and wine. He didn’t hack off one of his limbs and pass it around. It was symbolic. See. Will somebody call the Pope and let him know, you got it all wrong. Gimme the number, I’ll call him!😃
 
Uh oh…Call the Pope, I think you guys got this one wrong. It just hit me…When Jesus was on Earth, he took the bread, broke it and said "take, eat, this is my body, broken for you. And poured the wine and said Take, drink, this is my blood, shed for you for the forgiveness of sin. He passed around bread and wine. He didn’t hack off one of his limbs and pass it around. It was symbolic. See. Will somebody call the Pope and let him know, you got it all wrong. Gimme the number, I’ll call him!😃
We’re getting Close to What Christ Said, Did, all In Sacred Scripture: the Missing Words HERE are REAL PRESENCE = “Body and Blood”".
  • (1) [SIGN] The Mass IS The Last Supper Feast: same basics, (2) Our Lord ‘blessed’ the bread/wine into His Real Presence (Body/Blood); Jesus Christ The Saviour also does The ‘Blessing’, Consecration, Transubstantiation, of the Unleavened Bread (aka Host) and Wine Through the Apostolic Powers Priest,[/SIGN]
(3)
  • Christ’s “Do This in Memory of Me” at The Last Supper is Preciselly the Centerpiece of The Catholic Church, IMMEDIATELLY Begun by The Apostles: “The Last Supper Feast” (aka Mass) and ‘Blessing of Bread Wine’ (Consecration/Transubstantiation) in The Real Presence of Christ, (4) All Done By Christ Himself, through his earthly Priest, (All 7 Sacraments And Mass are done By Christ Himself),

    (5) [SIGN]
  • Why did Our Lord Repeatedly say ‘Unless you Eat My Flesh, Drink my Blood, thou can Not Have Life’, unless He Meant It? NO SYMBOLIZIM, No REMEMBRANCE, But The Mass/Real Presence Eucharist, (6) Several Real Scientific Evidence Eucharistic Miracles Prove Real Presence, Miraculous change of Consecrated Bread/Wine Into Flesh/Blood Verified (UNTOUCHED by Humans), 8th Century Italy on, Unaltered Still Real Flesh/Blood without Preservatives,
[/SIGN] (7)
  • brother Martin Luther Wrote After Calvin, etc, that he Never would have Begun the Reformation if he would have seen the (Thousands) of “Changes” the Reformation brought: Preaching and Singing, Remembrances, Etc., Etc, (8) All within the Last 550 Years, By men, now 33,000 sects claimed for ‘Christiantity’ by Secular sources. (9) We have/do Live Christ, The Bible for 2000 years, Not Men’s new Ideas of 550 years. (10) As Our Lord Taught, The Church Respects Everyone, Every Faith; Only ‘hates’ Sin/Evil.

    In Christ :blessyou: Ref: Mass of The Early Christians; Mike Aquilina, Scott Hahn (Each major Convert Bible Experts)

    Let’s not ignore Christ’s Word: “Blessed”; not just Bread, Wine. :hey_bud::bible1::highprayer:
 
Ref II: Search ** Eucharistic Miracles**, and Cite any Approved ones Refuted by any Science/Facts.
  • 👍 :amen::blessyou:
 
If anyone interested in The Reality of the Living Christ/Living The Bible, RCIA Begining Every Parish Now. No Obligations.
  • It is the Required Since the Catacombs Teachings 1800 years ago, before Qualified to RECEIVE The Real Presence Body/Bloood of Christ: 1.3 Billion Roman/Orthodox Catholics (of 2 Billion “Christians”, of alleged secularly 33,000 sects: only Partial Christ, His Teachings.)

    Live In Jesus/Vivat Jesu
 
Actually those that left believed more in the literal interpretation, somewhat as yourself.
Actually, those that left understood Jesus perfectly but did not want to take Him at His word. They did not accept as did the disciples that Jesus has the words of everlasting life. Much like your self.🙂
 
Actually ,I have been thinking a lot of your point .Can you tell me how you garnered this “tidbit” of info. I am finding it quite fascinating. Calumny is to attack one’s reputation with falsehoods .As a matter of fact, could an ultimate calumny lead to getting hung on a tree ? Do you and I not have eternal life in Christ because indeed He was attacked and was calumnified ? I have often said ,John 6 is about foretelling of his death ,and ascension,that he would not sit on the Davidic throne ,yet.(and not to follow Him for that reason -overthrow Romans etc ). Did not Jesus say in john 6 that he knew who would betray him while he said, " Gnaw on Me" (heap calumnies)? Was Judas (and Israel) “saved” by this ? Was Jesus being sarcastic ? Was he mad ? (remember he turned to the apostles and said, "Will you leave also ? "Sorry, he was mad ,disappointed. And the apostles said ,“We won’t heap calumnies on you , for you are true and have the words of eternal life,and know who you really are ,the Messiah”. …You have further convinced me of the rightness of the unliteral interpretation . But I would gladly listen to any sharpening ,for you are iron.Thank-you
So let me get this, you are saying that Jesus is indeed saying: if you attack me with calumny you will have everlasting life? So therefore, if you deny Jesus you will have everlasting life? How about you start that now since one must live by what one believes, eh?

And you are right, the apostles said we won’t heap calumnies on you, because if they did, then they would be understanding Jesus figuratively. 🙂

So if you if I have convinced you of the unliteral position, you are obviously have a problem grasping what figurative and literal means.
 
Do Catholics Believe in a Literal Adam and Eve in the Garden, or is it Symbolic?
 
Do Catholics Believe in a Literal Adam and Eve in the Garden, or is it Symbolic?
Catholics believe that there was a first man and first woman, our parents, who "transmitted to their descendants human nature wounded by their own first sin and hence deprived of original holiness and justice; this deprivation is called “original sin”. (from the Catechism).
 
No, he’d say we have an altar, where all are welcome.
Fair enough.

What sacrifice is offered at this altar? Do you have a ritual prayer that offers these sacrificial prayers? And from whence do these prayers come?
He **might **also say he is a bishop, and leads a congregation of priests in that pure offering.
What do you mean “he **might **also say”? Does he or doesn’t he? Is he a bishop or not? :confused:
 
So you noticed .If only you knew the “extra” work I put in to try to make it look as it is.But I laugh, cause I do have trouble with those commas, and that is where I draw the line, on fixing everyone. Sometimes I edit ten times. My initial typing is definitely rough draft .But thanks for noticing, I will try harder.
I appreciate it. 🙂 👍

Incidentally, it shouldn’t be too hard to make this one little change: add a space AFTER the punctuation mark, NOT BEFORE.
 
Do Catholics Believe in a Literal Adam and Eve in the Garden, or is it Symbolic?
Do protestants believe in a real life Jesus Christ or is He just symbolic? Were the apostles real live people or symbolic?
 
Careful, for some said Augustine was a switch hitter, batting from both sides of this plate .He said by believing we eat, “leave your teeth and bellies behind”. The bible also says we are His temple, and does not allude to RP as Him getting inside us . He tabernacles in us by regeneration, by faith, the gift of God.
Code:
                                                                                                                              :bible1: Jesus  Christ  said  at The  Last  Supper:  This  is  My  Body....This  is my  Blood....Unless you  Eat  my  Flesh...Drink   My  Blood,  Ye  can NOT  have  LIFE  Within  You.(Repeatedly.)                                                                                                          (1)    When  did  he EVER  say/suggest  this is a  Symbol,  This is  A  Remembrance???
  • ** (2) Why have ONLY the Apostles**, and those Presbyters they taught, Laid hands on To Annoint Apostolic Powers of Christ on, Said the Last Supper Feast, and “Blessed” Bread and Wine for 1970 Years, as Christ Said: DO THIS IN MY MEMORY
    Code:
                                                                                                                          (3)   Why  did   Christ  Repeat,  Several  Occassions, Several  Times:  Unless ye  Eat  My  Flesh,   Drink  My  Blood, Ye  Can Not Have Life?  
    
                                                                                                                          (4)  Why  did   Jesus   Christ  Himself  put  Qualifiers  on Receiving:  1Corr 11: 29:  "He  who Eats and  Drinks Without  Recognizing   The  Body Eats  and    Drinks a  Judgement  on  himself"                                                                                  
    
                                                                                                                        (5)   The  Judgements  is  Illness or Death:  1  Corr 11: 30  ff.      There  Are Examples of  violent  Illness  occurring  on those who do  Not   Recognize  Real  Presence,  Several  continents:  Japan,  Nigeria,  Europe,  Etc.,  RECENT  Years, Scientifically  Not  explainable  On  Medical  Exam.  The  Church  teaches  Death  in   God,  for Unworthy  Receipt.  
    
                                                                                                                       We Keep  Records  on Most Important Things: (The  Didache,  on Liturgy,  c.  110 AD),  The  Acts of The  Apostles.     :bible1:   And  We  were There,  When  Christ  Taught,  and  At  His  Last   Supper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top