R
remoat
Guest
some say the bible should be taken literally, no symbolism, no double-entendre: as is, where is… some say the bible uses symbols to make points not easily understood in other ways… what do you think? should the bible be taken “per se”? or, should it be taken as an allegorical presentation of how man should care for himself, his brothers and his natural world? one of the impressive arguments is revelation… it has been “preached” as the prediction for the end-of-the-world… nowadays, it is being interpreted as a commentary on a previous period in history, within a few hundred years of christ’s death… a documentary on the history channel says the propostion about the “beast’s” number being “666” is a reference to nero caesar… according to the hebrew alphabet, all letters have numerical value… in crurnching names thru the hebrew alphabet, one name has stood out as fitting the configuration, nero’s… much of revelation’s descriptions can be found to fit within the context of nero’s reign…
there are even discussions about whether christ died after crucifixion… some crazy theories say he was in some kind of hibernatory state, or coma, which allowed him time to recover and thereafter “rise”, after never having truly died… of coursed, this is pure rot, but what about other events and description? are they historical or predictive?
there are even discussions about whether christ died after crucifixion… some crazy theories say he was in some kind of hibernatory state, or coma, which allowed him time to recover and thereafter “rise”, after never having truly died… of coursed, this is pure rot, but what about other events and description? are they historical or predictive?