Little help please?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lost_Again
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

Lost_Again

Guest
I have always found those that frequent this forum to be very helpful so now is your chance to prove it once again.

I had this question pop up in one of my classes and after straining my brain for a way to answer it I thought I’d throw it out here.

Is faith in God possible without the acceptance, as true, of certain propositional facts – can you have faith devoid of knowledge?

NO, The instructor didn’t elaborate on what he meant by “certain propositional facts”, but I am working on getting some hints from him.

In the meantime would appreciate any (name removed by moderator)ut.

P.S. I am not asking you to help me with cheat with my homework as this class is taught locally in my church and is not graded.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
 
Yes, you can have faith without knowledge (depending on how you define knowledge) this is the base of Natural Moral Law. All souls are infused with a moral code, and knowledge of a divine presence. Some will answer that call even without training or education. This maybe the biggest problem atheists struggle with, they know right from wrong *yet they deny any reason exists *to know right from wrong.
 
Yes, you can have faith without knowledge (depending on how you define knowledge) this is the base of Natural Moral Law. All souls are infused with a moral code, and knowledge of a divine presence. Some will answer that call even without training or education. This maybe the biggest problem atheists struggle with, they know right from wrong *yet they deny any reason exists *to know right from wrong.
Good points…

However wouldn’t that sort of faith (without knowledge) be nothing more than a “blind faith”?
If I don’t know God, cannot prove his existence but still believe he exists, does that make him or my faith real?
It has been said that the more educated you are the less likely you are to have faith or believe in the existence of God. So, to believe in God must I remain ignorant?

My head is starting to hurt…😃 but I’m glad I’m taking this class… its making me think about my faith in ways I never did before.
 
Good points…

However wouldn’t that sort of faith (without knowledge) be nothing more than a “blind faith”?
If I don’t know God, cannot prove his existence but still believe he exists, does that make him or my faith real?
It has been said that the more educated you are the less likely you are to have faith or believe in the existence of God. So, to believe in God must I remain ignorant?

My head is starting to hurt…😃 but I’m glad I’m taking this class… its making me think about my faith in ways I never did before.
I agree with TEXAS ROOFER. God exists whether we know Him or not. God has chosen to reveal Himself to us in several ways: The Natural Moral Law each of us can sense. The Bible. Jesus Christ, His Son.

Cultural Anthropology documents that virtually all societies have a “spirit” that they acknowledge is greater than they are. They reverence that spirit which we call God. This is part of the Natural Law God has written in our hearts.

I would not call an uneducated faith a “blind” faith. I would call it “Instinctive” faith. Or “Natural” faith.

It is false that the more educated one becomes the less likely he is to believe in God. History is replete with extremely well educated men and women who fully believe in God. Pope Benedict XVI and Pope John Paul II come to mind. St Thomas Aquinas (1200 AD?) and St Augustine (500 AD?) also to name two more. A faulty education often causes such disbelief but a better education does not.

Also, mankind has Free Will. Thus, we can choose to ignore our education, to put ourselves FIRST and reject any notion of a higher power to whom we owe our very existence and therefore should want to know, love, and serve out of gratitude.

If you can, get a copy of the 1 hour DVD, “The Case for a Creator.”
 
I agree with TEXAS ROOFER. God exists whether we know Him or not. God has chosen to reveal Himself to us in several ways: The Natural Moral Law each of us can sense. The Bible. Jesus Christ, His Son.

Cultural Anthropology documents that virtually all societies have a “spirit” that they acknowledge is greater than they are. They reverence that spirit which we call God. This is part of the Natural Law God has written in our hearts.

I would not call an uneducated faith a “blind” faith. I would call it “Instinctive” faith. Or “Natural” faith.

It is false that the more educated one becomes the less likely he is to believe in God. History is replete with extremely well educated men and women who fully believe in God. Pope Benedict XVI and Pope John Paul II come to mind. St Thomas Aquinas (1200 AD?) and St Augustine (500 AD?) also to name two more. A faulty education often causes such disbelief but a better education does not.

Also, mankind has Free Will. Thus, we can choose to ignore our education, to put ourselves FIRST and reject any notion of a higher power to whom we owe our very existence and therefore should want to know, love, and serve out of gratitude.

If you can, get a copy of the 1 hour DVD, “The Case for a Creator.”
Good to know… I’ll look for the DVD

My comments were based loosely on what the “Secular” world states about Knowledge and faith. *** for the people you point out, they were all learned men. I especially admire Augustine because he was a convert from a somewhat hedonistic lifestyle.

These quotes came up in our class as well from another student and I thought they were worth mentioning.

In his book, Dear Agnos, Arlie J. Hoover stated that “…faith, by standing between knowledge and ignorance, certainty and credulity, in a sense partakes of the essence of both. It has some evidence, which relates it to knowledge, yet it has some uncertainty, because the evidence is indirect” (1976, p. 28). Roy F. Osborne has suggested that “faith of any sort is based on probability… In a world of fallible beings, imperfect senses, and partial experience, absolute certainty is only a theoretical concept” (1964, p. 132).

If these writers are correct, faith is something based on little substantive proof, or, for that matter, no proof at all. Faith also allows men to “act like” they know something when, in fact, they do not. Further, at best faith is a probability proposition that may, or may not, have anything to do with truth. And, faith is seen as an entity composed of a small amount of knowledge and a big dose of uncertainty. Is it any wonder then that there is so much confusion in today’s world regarding the concept of faith and its relationship to knowledge.

Your thoughts…
 
Good to know… I’ll look for the DVD

My comments were based loosely on what the “Secular” world states about Knowledge and faith. *** for the people you point out, they were all learned men. I especially admire Augustine because he was a convert from a somewhat hedonistic lifestyle.

These quotes came up in our class as well from another student and I thought they were worth mentioning.

In his book, Dear Agnos, Arlie J. Hoover stated that “…faith, by standing between knowledge and ignorance, certainty and credulity, in a sense partakes of the essence of both. It has some evidence, which relates it to knowledge, yet it has some uncertainty, because the evidence is indirect” (1976, p. 28). Roy F. Osborne has suggested that “faith of any sort is based on probability… In a world of fallible beings, imperfect senses, and partial experience, absolute certainty is only a theoretical concept” (1964, p. 132).

If these writers are correct, faith is something based on little substantive proof, or, for that matter, no proof at all. Faith also allows men to “act like” they know something when, in fact, they do not. Further, at best faith is a probability proposition that may, or may not, have anything to do with truth. And, faith is seen as an entity composed of a small amount of knowledge and a big dose of uncertainty. Is it any wonder then that there is so much confusion in today’s world regarding the concept of faith and its relationship to knowledge.

Your thoughts…
First, the caveat: I am not a scholar. But I have done my best to find ways to explain why I remain a Catholic. If I write incorrectly or misleadingly, I trust others will speak up.

God’s ways are far above man’s ways. Faith is a gift from God. Many of us got that gift very early in life; some got it later, some not yet, and some have rejected it. None of us has complete understanding as we are not in Heaven yet. Yet many have a much better understanding than we do and they are trying to teach us, if we but choose to listen and try to learn.

Developing a stronger Faith does take effort and sometimes we get confused and have to find our way back to the path. We may learn much, but there will still be areas where we just have to TRUST that, based on what we already know, the area is indeed TRUE even if we cannot explain it.

There is much more than “little substantive proof or no proof at all.” If one doubts or rejects the reports of Jesus Christ, then one must also reject the reports of George Washington as we have seen neither man, we have only reports of them. If one doubts or rejects God then one should also reject air as we have seen neither, but only their effects.

I have not studied Hoover. He has placed FAITH between knowledge and ignorance. I am not sure at all that that is Faith’s proper place. He has put it there to make his point. God transcends everything including knowledge and ignorance. So, for me, Faith in God cannot be placed between knowledge and ignorance, but rather above knowledge. Faith is suported by knowledge and knowledge chases out ignorance.

Likewise, Osborne’s “absolute certainity is only a theoretical concept” seems an attempt to make another point that may be misleading. What about 2+2=4? Absolute certainity here only a theory? We also have scientific LAWS that are so well proven as to transcend theory. So I think there are absolute certainities. Whether an individual accepts these or not depends on his personal knowledge and his free will to accept the Truth or not.

Yet, I think it is also true that none of us has absolute complete knowledge of God. But we do have enough of God’s revelation in words and deeds (miracles) to be absolutely certain that God does exist and He wants to have a loving relationship with each of us if we but choose to accept His offer.

If I go to bed and wake up the next morning to see 6 inches of snow that was not there the night before, I am absolutely certain it snowed even thought I did not see it snow. I may be ignorant of why and how it snowed, but I have reliable evidence.
 
I have always found those that frequent this forum to be very helpful so now is your chance to prove it once again.

I had this question pop up in one of my classes and after straining my brain for a way to answer it I thought I’d throw it out here.

Is faith in God possible without the acceptance, as true, of certain propositional facts – can you have faith devoid of knowledge?

NO, The instructor didn’t elaborate on what he meant by “certain propositional facts”, but I am working on getting some hints from him.

In the meantime would appreciate any (name removed by moderator)ut.

P.S. I am not asking you to help me with cheat with my homework as this class is taught locally in my church and is not graded.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
Certainly there is a point in a continuum with faith on one end and knowledge on the other where the two are mutually exclusive. Sufficient knowledge obviates faith.

While it is not correct to say that faith is the converse of knowledge, it is fair to say that faith is the converse of sufficient knowledge.
 
Good points…

However wouldn’t that sort of faith (without knowledge) be nothing more than a “blind faith”?
If I don’t know God, cannot prove his existence but still believe he exists, does that make him or my faith real?
It has been said that the more educated you are the less likely you are to have faith or believe in the existence of God. So, to believe in God must I remain ignorant?

My head is starting to hurt…😃 but I’m glad I’m taking this class… its making me think about my faith in ways I never did before.
Here is the problem, faith is all you have. If they tell you they are so smart ask them to prove tomorrow will occur, they cannot do it, yet they have no problem planning for tomorrow. Do they raise children as though tomorrow will not come? Do they save for retirement with no prove they will retire? And on and on it goes. A process engineer has to ask his self a tough question “When do you know?” When do you know this is the cause of the problem?, When do you know this is the solution? When do you know this change had an affect or no affect? In the real world it is not 100% failure followed by 100% success. In the real word improvements occur in small increments hard to see, hard to measure, and hard to prove. Often it takes years to see final affects. So how do scientist make progress under these conditions, it turns out to be faith. They have faith they are making progress and will make progress so they work on progress everyday for years. It is faith simply faith.

Now let’s look at the case for all intelligent people are atheist and all stupid people are religious. So we surely would not have any religious schools under that system, do we have any? Also if a religion tried to form a school it surely convert to a secular school because the intelligent graduates would of course grow to be atheist. Popes, Bishops, USCCB, etc would all have to have limited intelligence to stop them from converting to atheism. So does this describe the real world? How about an alternative theory " It is easier for a camel to fit through the eye of a needle than a rich person to go to Heaven" Maybe that statement was not limited to money?
 
I have always found those that frequent this forum to be very helpful so now is your chance to prove it once again.

I had this question pop up in one of my classes and after straining my brain for a way to answer it I thought I’d throw it out here.

Is faith in God possible without the acceptance, as true, of certain propositional facts – can you have faith devoid of knowledge?

NO, The instructor didn’t elaborate on what he meant by “certain propositional facts”, but I am working on getting some hints from him.

In the meantime would appreciate any (name removed by moderator)ut.

P.S. I am not asking you to help me with cheat with my homework as this class is taught locally in my church and is not graded.

Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
There is an old saying: I do not believe because I understand; I believe so that I may understand. Faith is a gift of God. Understanding is what we conclude because of our faith. Many very simple minded people believe, have faith, but do not have the capacity to fully understand what they believe. And, of course, there are things we believe that none of us will ever be able to fully understand, either here or in heaven, like the Trinity.
 
NO, The instructor didn’t elaborate on what he meant by “certain propositional facts”, but I am working on getting some hints from him.
I’d be interested to know what a " propositional fact" is too. You can have propositional attitudes, but that’s just another term for beliefs.
 
Is faith in God possible without the acceptance, as true, of certain propositional facts – can you have faith devoid of knowledge?
It is possible but it is irrational! If you have no reason whatsoever to believe in something why believe it? We have plenty of knowledge but it is all based on the assumption that we can understand something about reality. So, whether we realise it or not, we have faith in the power of reason and faith that reality is reasonable! Then there is the reality of good and evil. That alone takes us a long way towards God but what clinches the issue is the reality of love. How do you explain that without God?
 
Yes, you can have faith without knowledge (depending on how you define knowledge) this is the base of Natural Moral Law. All souls are infused with a moral code, and knowledge of a divine presence. Some will answer that call even without training or education. This maybe the biggest problem atheists struggle with, they know right from wrong *yet they deny any reason exists *to know right from wrong.
shakes head NO. They do not deny ANY reason exists- there is the small point of what works best for society, survival, and other reasons. This is not an accurate summary of athiest’s beliefs. I do not even have all the athiest’s viewpoints on this but can tell you that much.
 
shakes head NO. They do not deny ANY reason exists- there is the small point of what works best for society, survival, and other reasons. This is not an accurate summary of athiest’s beliefs. I do not even have all the athiest’s viewpoints on this but can tell you that much.
no, that is Kant unfortunately Kant died without being able to explain how people lying and stealing benefited society, or how people could me moral and lie or steal, or if people lie and steal how those people could build the moral society, etc… Kant had a lot of time but just never explained the answer. Kant probably thanks god he lived before the sex habits of people could enter the public discussion.
 
no, that is Kant unfortunately Kant died without being able to explain how people lying and stealing benefited society, or how people could me moral and lie or steal, or if people lie and steal how those people could build the moral society, etc… Kant had a lot of time but just never explained the answer. Kant probably thanks god he lived before the sex habits of people could enter the public discussion.
Isn’t there something in the CCC about withholding information from someone who … does not need to know the information? I remember reading that on a thread re: do you tell the gestapo about the whereabouts of a Jew if they question you and you know where one is? Something like that.
There is another thread a couple days or so old regarding that issue with a anglican? or Episcopalian priest saying “it’s okay to steal” and some catholics are saying he is right if it is in context of them stealing to survive starvation…

So, not sure what you are saying here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top