Brother JR, you could not be more wrong about this being “silly”, and the Vatican is obviously the first to disagree with you.
Actually, the Vatican and agree on this, if you take my meaning from what I said. By too many cooks in the kitchen I’m referring to too many people trying to dictate and opine how to fix this problem. I’m not denying the problem. By silly, I’m referring to the assumptions that people make about several thousand sisters when the Vatican did not make such statements. The Vatican’s statement is about the LCWR. Not about every congregation in the USA. To imply that this is the case is silly. To imply that 80% of American sisters buy into this nonsense is also silly. It cannot be proven.
The LCWR alleges to represent 80% of American sisters. If they get one person from 80% of the religious congregations, they can pin up on their data that they have the support of 80% of those congregations. One person does not make up a congregation. When you go to their functions, you find 200 or 300 sisters out of several thousand and you’re not even sure how many of those who attended the function buy into what was presented. Therefore, the Vatican has to deal with the organization that sponsors these dissenting activities, not with the individual congregations. That’s what the Vatican is doing. The Vatican is not sounding the alarm that 80% of American sisters are a problem. The blogs are and forums like this are, not the Vatican. That’s the silly part. That what is being said on the internet and what is being said at the Vatican and at religious houses is not the same thing. No one is keeping secrets. It’s just that people are reading into things what is not there or that which is being misrepresented by the LCWR.
Not quite correct. From the
LCWR website
:
The Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) is an association of the leaders of congregations of Catholic women religious in the United States.
The conference has more than 1500 members, who represent more than 80 percent of the 57,000 women religious in the United States. Founded in 1956, the conference assists its members to collaboratively carry out their service of leadership to further the mission of the Gospel in today’s world.
Jeanine Gramick: co-foundress of
the homosexual, lesbian
activist organization
New Ways Ministry mentioned in
the Vatican document.
I already spoke about the numbers issue above. This came out very clearly when they wrote their support for the HHR mandate. There was a rebuttal by the superiors saying that the support had come from 60 to 80 sisters who are on the leadership team of the LCWR, not from the Conference of Major Superiors who actually govern women religious and have the authority to speak for them. The LCWR is a medium for the sisters, not an authoritative voice to make decisions for the sisters. The press and the bloggers don’t understand the function of the Conference.
The Vatican understands it and is rightfully concerned, because of several reasons.
- The LCWR is providing ongoing education and formation that is non compliant with Church teaching.
- The LCWR is speak against Church policy allegedly in the name of thousands of sisters, which misleads the faithful, like yourself in two ways. It leads one to believe that several thousand sisters are out to lunch and it leads us to believe that they have the authority to speak for the sisters, which they do not. This is hurtful to the community. We don’t disagree on that.
- The LCWR does not have the oversight of the bishops, so if the Vatican does not provide oversight, the LCWR or any other conference can derail, as the report suggests.
I don’t belong to the LCWR nor am I a member of the Holy See. I can only repeat what the Vatican says. If it says that the Conference has derailed, that’s all I can repeat. I can’t say that several thousand sisters have derailed, because I know that the Conference DOES NOT represent that many sisters. Just because someone signs a card and mails in $50 a year does not mean that the person is actively involved. The HHR issue proved it. When the superiors spoke they contradicted what the LCWR was saying about whom they represented.
The problem with the Conference is not silly. What’s silly is the explosive interpretation that people are giving this, while the Vatican and the Conference of Major Superiors of Women Religious is being very calms and very intellectual about this. They’re saying to the LCWR, “Let’s help you get back on track.” That’s a good thing. I pray that everyone does get back on the same page for the good of God’s people.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, FFV