Liturgy of the Word or Eucharist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hcbcsd
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

hcbcsd

Guest
In the eyes of the Church, what is more important or of higher significance in the Mass, the Liturgy of the Word or the Liturgy of the Eucharist, or are they equal? In the parish that I attend, and even in many threads on this site, it seems like the Eucharist is paramount. For example, our parish priests’ homilies are increasingly diluted and devoid of anything based on the readings for the Mass. I agree with the Eucharist’s significance given that it is truly the body and blood of Christ, but I am concerned about this perception and what I perceive to be many Catholics’ ignorance of Scripture. As St. Jerome said, if you don’t know Scripture, you cannot know Christ. Curious on the Church’s position and what others’ perception is in their parishes? Thank you.
 
As a lector, I don’t enjoy saying this.

The Liturgy of the Eurcharist is the heart and soul of the Mass. You can read Scripture without having a Mass, but you can’t have a Mass without transubstantion.

I’m willing and ready to be corrected on this.
 
They are of equal significance but in a heirarchy of value. The Mass is invalid if there is no Consecration. The same can’t be said of any other part of the Mass.

The Liturgy of the Word is also important but the homily is only one part of it. As long as the readings are being read and you are attending to the Word of God, you are getting the most important part of the LotW. Not that the homily isn’t important but a bad homily doesn’t make a bad Mass.
 
hcbcsd said:
In the eyes of the Church, what is more important or of higher significance in the Mass, the Liturgy of the Word or the Liturgy of the Eucharist, or are they equal? In the parish that I attend, and even in many threads on this site, it seems like the Eucharist is paramount. For example, our parish priests’ homilies are increasingly diluted and devoid of anything based on the readings for the Mass. I agree with the Eucharist’s significance given that it is truly the body and blood of Christ, but I am concerned about this perception and what I perceive to be many Catholics’ ignorance of Scripture. As St. Jerome said, if you don’t know Scripture, you cannot know Christ. Curious on the Church’s position and what others’ perception is in their parishes? Thank you.
Click to expand...
The Eucharist is paramount, in its own way, as it the summit and source of the Mass and of the Church. But this in no way takes away the value we place on Sacred Scripture, on the contrary it increases our appreciation of it.

The Eucharist is the beating heart of Scripture, as the Eucharist is the source of all sacred scripture (The Eucharist is Jesus, the incarnate Word of God Himself who is the source of all Sacred Scripture). In addition the true nature of the Eucharist is revealed in scripture and the therefore it is incorrect to completely separate the liturgy of the Word and the Liturgy of the Eucharist during Mass, rather they are two great streams of grace and an outpouring of the love of God.
 
hcbcsd said:
In the eyes of the Church, what is more important or of higher significance in the Mass, the Liturgy of the Word or the Liturgy of the Eucharist, or are they equal? .
Click to expand...
don’t understand the question
without the Liturgy of the Eucharist there is no Mass, and the the Eucharist is the source and summit of all worship.
 
Actually, did you know that within the mass, the length of both liturgies is supposed to be equal, without one being significantly greater in length or in emphasis than the other? In other words, if the liturgy of the word is 25 minutes, then the liturgy of the eucharist ought to be roughly the same amount of time. Interesting, no? This is because each liturgy is to be given equal importance within the Mass.
 
The two parts which, in a certain sense, go to make up the Mass, namely, the liturgy of the word and the eucharistic liturgy, are so closely connected with each other that they form but one single act of worship. Accordingly this sacred Synod strongly urges pastors of souls that, when instructing the faithful, they insistently teach them to take their part in the entire Mass, especially on Sundays and feasts of obligation. (Sacrosanctum Concilium 56)

“The two parts which in a sense go to make up the Mass, namely the Liturgy of the Word and the Eucharist Liturgy, are so closely connected that they form but one single act of worship.” A person should not approach the table of the Bread of the Lord without having first been at the table of His Word. Sacred Scripture is therefore of the highest importance in the celebration of Mass. (Inaestimabile Donum 1)
That being said… the Eucharist is the source and summit of our faith and of our liturgy. The Eucharist Itself is a sacrament – reading/hearing the Scriptures is not. Jesus’ presence in the Eucharist is presence “par excellence” (Paul VI, Mysterium Fidei).
 
mwb85611 said:
Actually, did you know that within the mass, the length of both liturgies is supposed to be equal, without one being significantly greater in length or in emphasis than the other? In other words, if the liturgy of the word is 25 minutes, then the liturgy of the eucharist ought to be roughly the same amount of time. Interesting, no? This is because each liturgy is to be given equal importance within the Mass.
Click to expand...
Do you have a source for that? The time period for the Liturgy of the Eucharist is largely driven by the number of communicants not the level of importance given it since the words are all scripted in the Liturgy of the Eucharist.
 
The homily is supposed to be based on at least one of the readings. The direction about the parts of the Mass being fairly equal in length is probably to prevent homilies from being excessively lengthy, so that the celebration of the liturgy of the Eucharist would seem to take second place. However, ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ, and the liturgy of the Word is an integral part of the Mass.

We come together at Mass to hear God’s word and reflect on how to apply it in our lives, to worship the Father by joining ourselves to Jesus’ sacrifice made present for us by the power of the Holy Spirit through the words and actions of the priest, and to receive Him as the Bread of Life. The Eucharist is Jesus Himself. But we need to hear and understand the scriptures to understand who it is that we are receiving and what He desires of us.

In a way the question divides something which shouldn’t be separated. It would be like going home to visit your father and someone asking you which was more important, the physical presence of your father or the words of love and encouragement he was speaking to you while you were with him.

My pastor carefully prepares a homily, even on weekdays. Most of the time it’s based on the scripture readings but sometimes on the saint or feast of the day. On Sundays it’s always about the readings.
 
Corki said:
Do you have a source for that? The time period for the Liturgy of the Eucharist is largely driven by the number of communicants not the level of importance given it since the words are all scripted in the Liturgy of the Eucharist.
Click to expand...
Yep! I don’t have the time to read through it all currently, but if you haven’t read it, I would recommend reading the entire document anyways. Read “Sacrosanctum Concilium,” one of the constitutions from Vatican II. You can find it on the vatican website.

vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19631204_sacrosanctum-concilium_en.html

The other source would be Instruction Redemptionis Sacramentum, also at the vatican website. I want to say that this is covered in Chapter 3, which is about the right celebration of the Mass.

vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20040423_redemptionis-sacramentum_en.html

If you have not read any of the constitutions or declarations that came out of vatican II or later, I would highly recommend reading them. They will give you a much better understanding of the Catholic church.
 
hcbcsd said:
In the eyes of the Church, what is more important or of higher significance in the Mass, the Liturgy of the Word or the Liturgy of the Eucharist, or are they equal? In the parish that I attend, and even in many threads on this site, it seems like the Eucharist is paramount. For example, our parish priests’ homilies are increasingly diluted and devoid of anything based on the readings for the Mass. I agree with the Eucharist’s significance given that it is truly the body and blood of Christ, but I am concerned about this perception and what I perceive to be many Catholics’ ignorance of Scripture. As St. Jerome said, if you don’t know Scripture, you cannot know Christ. Curious on the Church’s position and what others’ perception is in their parishes? Thank you.
Click to expand...
Theres a very good book on the mass by Dom Prosper Gueranger, the author lists what we should have in mind whilst assisting at mass in order of importance ‘*In the holy Eucharist there are three things for us to ever hold in view; First, the sacrifice whereby glory is given to God; secondly, the Sacrament which is the Food of our souls; thirdly, the possession of Our Lord personally in his Real Presence… *’

The highest significance of a mass according to the author is ‘The sacrifice whereby Glory is given to God’, holy scripture is used throughout the liturgy in order to raise the mind to God and help effect this aim. The homily could therefore be called the least important part of Mass, not that it is umimportant but that compared to the act of sacrifice to God it is infinitely less important. Homilies aren’t compulsory for all Mass’s for example I attend the Tridentine Mass where there are virtually only homilies on a sunday.

That said, Priests should not neglect the homily as we are told that [BIBLEDRB]‘The word of God is like a double edged sword’[/BIBLEDRB] but we must always keep the primary ‘purpose’ if I may be so crude, in mind.
 
Without the Liturgy of the Word, there is no Mass. Without the Liturgy of the Eucharist, there is no Mass.

Seems pretty cut-and-dried to me, but that’s the funny thing about humans, you always want to have things in conflict or superlative.
 
The most important part of the Mass is the Most Holy Sacrifice. That’s coming from an FSSP priest.

In the NO, the Liturgy of the Eucharist is actually longer when the short Eucharistic Prayer isn’t used, and it’s sung from the Sursum Corda right to the Agnus Dei. This is how it used to be done at the majority of churches I went to growing up in the 90s. After I returned to the Church I noticed the actual Mass part of the Mass was shorter than I remembered, and it was never sung. Personally I felt the priests were slacking and getting lazy with that part.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top