Looking at Artificial Contraception from another Perspective

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sierrah
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
CountrySinger said:
I was on the pill for the same reason. I would be crying in bed unable to move because of the pain. Needless to say, I missed a lot of school. My mom would have to carry me because I couldn’t walk without pain, and I was anemic due to blood loss. We had tried natural cures, Catholic doctors, nothing worked.
I was put on painkillers for a while, but they just made me sick. I was on the pill for six months, then I was taken off. And my cramps haven’t been horrible since. They are within the realm of normal pain (ie I can go to work).

For therapeutic purposes, it was a miracle. Better than ending up addicted to painkillers. It is not something I wanted to take, but it worked for me.
Click to expand...
It’s situations like yours that show that in some cases, the pill can be a good option. I guess that’s why a lot of priests aren’t quick to condemn pharmacies for filling the prescriptions. I personally hated being on the pill, and never want to take it again, but for some people in extreme situations, it can actually be a cure.
 
Taking somethign to stop your body doing somethign it does naturally is never a good idea, IMHO.

I’ve read a book called “The Bitter Pill” written by one of the scientists who helped test the pill when it first came along, the book is about 30 years old but full of interesting insights and other scary stuff. She actually mentions a “man pill” that they were looking at, but a few guys got swollen testicles so they pulled it, all the while a lot of women were developing clots and dying.

Obvious who’s life has more value and who has to risk theirs for no strings attached sex.
 
Apollos said:
Ok, so are you opposed to chemotherapy, where you deliberately fill someone’s body with dangerous poison instead of natural hormones?
Click to expand...
Chemotherapy employs poison to kill a pathogen, namely, cancerous issue. The side effects are not intended, and if it were possible to do so, would be avoided completely.

Fertility is normal, natural, and healthy. Cancer is not. The birth control pill treats a woman’s fertility as a pathogen. It is intentionally self-destructive. It is chemical self-mutilation.
 
gferrer said:
Chemotherapy employs poison to kill a pathogen, namely, cancerous issue. The side effects are not intended, and if it were possible to do so, would be avoided completely.

Fertility is normal, natural, and healthy. Cancer is not. The birth control pill treats a woman’s fertility as a pathogen. It is intentionally self-destructive. It is chemical self-mutilation.
Click to expand...
👍 Exactly. As a pharmacist it amazes me that people shrug off the adverse effects of the Pill (or the even worse adverse effects of contraceptive injections, implants and contraceptive-laden IUDs) by saying hey a lot of other commonly used drugs have just as bad adverse effects. But they’re comparing apples with oranges. Other drugs are given to sick people (in the case of chemotherapy, extremely sick or dying people) to try to heal them. Contraceptives are ghiven to perfectly healthy women in order to make them unhealthy with respect to their fertility.

Medically speaking, when a substance has NO therapeutically beneficial effects, nothing less than ZERO adverse effects is, or should be, acceptable. Yet millions of women have been led to believe that having their bodies constantly filled with levels of highly potent synthetic sex hormones thousands of times the natural levels (and often starting from teenage years and continuing continuously for decades) will somehow make them “liberated”!
 
When the pill and other artificial birth control chemicals are advertised, they mention such side effects as breast cancer, blood clots, high blood pressure and heart disease. :eek:

I don’t know of any other drugs on the market that would cause all of these serious side effects. If the pill was not a birth control method, I doubt it would be on the market due to all of the side effects.

Here is something that gripes me. For my daughter to receive so much as a tylenol from the school nurse, I would have to sign a consent paper. Yet, the nurse passes out prescriptions
for birth control like it is candy with no signed consent form. The school says it is legal because the age of consent to have sex in our state is 16. This is twisted.
 
Galnextdoor said:
Here is something that gripes me. For my daughter to receive so much as a tylenol from the school nurse, I would have to sign a consent paper. Yet, the nurse passes out prescriptions
for birth control like it is candy with no signed consent form. The school says it is legal because the age of consent to have sex in our state is 16. This is twisted.
Click to expand...
Surely only a doctor can write prescriptions for hormonal contraceptives?
 
He gives her a perscription pad with the prescriptions all filled out and signed. She puts the student’s name on it then gives it to them.
 
Galnextdoor said:
He gives her a perscription pad with the prescriptions all filled out and signed. She puts the student’s name on it then gives it to them.
Click to expand...
Report them both to the state Medical Board or equivalent. I’d be very surprised if they don’t throw the book at both of them - she for impersonating a doctor, him for issuing prescriptions to patients he hasn’t examined or consulted with (or even met, in fact he doesn’t even know who they are). Then again the authorities sometimes have a blind spot when it comes to contraceptives and don’t enforce the law the way they would if it was any other prescription-only medicine being given out illegally.
 
You sure this isn’t a “nurse practitioner?” They are allowed to wrote prescriptions, IIRC.

Contraception is the only medicine I know of that is intended to transform a healthily functioning body system into a malfunctioning one.
 
This is definitely not a nurse practitioner. Parents have tried to protest, but have only hit a brick wall.
 
Nobody I know recognizes the doctor’s name. I don’t know if the nurse has a medical board that oversees her actions or not. The school’s attitude is that the parents just need to accept the fact that young teenagers are sexually active and that’s part of life.
 
Prescription laws exist precisely to prevent drug use without the supervision of a doctor. If this nurse is filling in blank signed prescriptions, the doctor who signed them is committing malpractice!

Contact the state licensing board and ask how to make a compliant. The state attorney general’s office might be a good starting place too.
 
Artificial contraception is just bad. Nothing else needs to be said really about it. Either you practice it or you dont. If you want to be in the good graces of God, dont do it. Simple as that. No other explanation is needed.
 
Galnextdoor said:
Nobody I know recognizes the doctor’s name. I don’t know if the nurse has a medical board that oversees her actions or not.
Click to expand...
In that case he may not even be a registered doctor. The state Medical Board is able to prosecute ANYONE who “holds out as” or pretends to be a doctor or does things which only a doctor is allowed to do. So they certainly have jurisdiction over this nurse.
 
I am sure he is a doctor somewhere, but I just don’t know where.
 
Galnextdoor said:
I am sure he is a doctor somewhere, but I just don’t know where.
Click to expand...
Just report all the facts you know, or have reason to suspect, to the Medical Board and they will make any further investigation required and take the appropriate action against both the doctor and the nurse. trust me, they will be very interested in what you have said here.

Btw a doctor needs to be registered in the State where he issues prescriptions. If not it doesn’t matter if he is a registered doctor in some other State/s or country/ies, as far as the law is concerned he is no different from any other person who is not a registered doctor in that state.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top