Looking for information on Ustasha

  • Thread starter Thread starter Polaris
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Polaris

Guest
Hello, I just read a pro serb book about Pope Pius the XII and Ustasha and it was pretty convincing, I was wondering if anyone knows a book showing the catholic viewpoint of this or its defense. I haven’t found one yet but would like to see both sides as always.
 
What was the name of this book? Most of the things I know about the Ustasha isn’t good or flattering. They were the pro-Nazi fascist government of Serbia during World War II. Unfortunately, many Serbian Church officials participated in the forced conversions of Orthodox christians, the killing of Orthodox priests and the rounding up and handing over of Jews to the Nazis. If what I remember is correct there were many Church officials and priests that opposed the Ustasha and suffered at their hands, too.

ChadS
 
What was the name of this book? Most of the things I know about the Ustasha isn’t good or flattering. They were the pro-Nazi fascist government of Serbia during World War II. Unfortunately, many Serbian Church officials participated in the forced conversions of Orthodox christians, the killing of Orthodox priests and the rounding up and handing over of Jews to the Nazis. If what I remember is correct there were many Church officials and priests that opposed the Ustasha and suffered at their hands, too.

ChadS
Ustasha movement was Croatian, not Serbian.

Anyway, this topic almost always produces nothing but bitter arguments and division. I believe that part of the problem is that much of the anti-Ustasha material comes from the communists who setup a bunch of show trials to try and legitimatize their regime. It is my understanding that a lot of the exaggerations come from the communists who wanted to slander not just the fascists but the Catholics as well, in order to build legitimacy. Sadly, some anti-Catholics like to use the exaggerated material to point out the evils of the Church or some other kind of juvenile exercise of polemics. Certainly some of the Church was guilty, but that is usually used as a pretense to slander the Church as a whole.
 
Hello, I just read a pro serb book about Pope Pius the XII and Ustasha and it was pretty convincing, I was wondering if anyone knows a book showing the catholic viewpoint of this or its defense. I haven’t found one yet but would like to see both sides as always.
but you are not going to tell us the name of the book the author, or cite the areas of concern. great. what kind of answer would you like. how about, I have been reading a lot about Pope Pius XII and his cause for canonization, and read about a lot of false accusations made against him, which grieve me, so would like more info. vague statement, vague question. and not a useful basis for discussion.
 
Ustasha movement was Croatian, not Serbian.

Anyway, this topic almost always produces nothing but bitter arguments and division. I believe that part of the problem is that much of the anti-Ustasha material comes from the communists who setup a bunch of show trials to try and legitimatize their regime. It is my understanding that a lot of the exaggerations come from the communists who wanted to slander not just the fascists but the Catholics as well, in order to build legitimacy. Sadly, some anti-Catholics like to use the exaggerated material to point out the evils of the Church or some other kind of juvenile exercise of polemics. Certainly some of the Church was guilty, but that is usually used as a pretense to slander the Church as a whole.
I apologize for mistakenly attributing the nationality of the Ustasha. It is sometimes difficult to find out how culpable the governments of the occupied lands during WWII were and how much they helped or hindered the Nazis.

I do not think that all or even most of the charges against the Ustasha can be attributed mainly to Communist show trials. One reason is that the Serbs were part of the newly establish Yugoslavia and even though it was a police state it wouldn’t help to antagonize one sizable ethnic group unduly. Secondly, after the war many Croats and Ustasha officials were tried by Allied war crime tribunals and not just Communist show trial commissions. Even to this day Nazis on the Wisenthal Center list still carry Croatian surnames, a testament to the lengths they went to aid the fascist government and the Nazi project.

Sometimes Church officials are slandered using information from this ugly period of history. Unfortunately there is much corroborated information out there that shows the lengths that some priest and monks went to expel and kill the Orthodox in what they considered “Serbian” lands.

ChadS
 
I apologize for mistakenly attributing the nationality of the Ustasha. It is sometimes difficult to find out how culpable the governments of the occupied lands during WWII were and how much they helped or hindered the Nazis.
This is especially so in formerly communist lands.
I do not think that all or even most of the charges against the Ustasha can be attributed mainly to Communist show trials.
Of course, the Ustasha was an oppressive barbaric regime, I don’t think anyone would say otherwise.
One reason is that the Serbs were part of the newly establish Yugoslavia and even though it was a police state it wouldn’t help to antagonize one sizable ethnic group unduly
Tito certainly did a great job at keeping the ancient feuds under control. That said, the show trials weren’t meant to antagonize Croatians so much as fascists, the communists themselves had Croatians in their ranks.
Sometimes Church officials are slandered using information from this ugly period of history. Unfortunately there is much corroborated information out there that shows the lengths that some priest and monks went to expel and kill the Orthodox in what they considered “Serbian” lands.
Yes, and no one will deny this evil. My problem is how this information is used, especially when its in the hands of nationalists. I like to participate on various Eastern European forums because of my own heritage, and this topic makes me cringe whenever I see it. I just thought that I should raise some of those concerns before anyone decides to go down that route.
 
I am at a loss to see what this has to do with Eastern Catholicism, but am concearned that it is a topic that as often as not can be used to foment diatribe and ill will against the Catholic Church because individual Catholics were involved in movements that were less than savory. (Surprise, surprise! Catholics who missed the mark and were sinners.)

Why did you choose to post this vague question, without reference to your book you have been reading, or specific chage, in the Eastern Catholic Forum?

I hope this topic gets moved.
 
I am at a loss to see what this has to do with Eastern Catholicism, but am concearned that it is a topic that as often as not can be used to foment diatribe and ill will against the Catholic Church because individual Catholics were involved in movements that were less than savory. (Surprise, surprise! Catholics who missed the mark and were sinners.)

Why did you choose to post this vague question, without reference to your book you have been reading, or specific chage, in the Eastern Catholic Forum?

I hope this topic gets moved.
I too would like to know the name of this book. The OP hasn’t bothered to produce the name of the book in either the first (most logical place) post or any subsequent posts either.

I wonder if the book he is citing is or takes its cue from Daniel Goldhagen’s “A Moral Reckoning.” In my opinion that book was a poorly researched polemic against the Church that conveniently missed several important facts and misinterpreted events in ways that other historians of the era don’t even venture towards. If I remember correctly this book was received even more poorly than his first book “Hitler’s Willing Executioners.”

ChadS
 
but you are not going to tell us the name of the book the author, or cite the areas of concern. great. what kind of answer would you like. how about, I have been reading a lot about Pope Pius XII and his cause for canonization, and read about a lot of false accusations made against him, which grieve me, so would like more info. vague statement, vague question. and not a useful basis for discussion.
Im not attacking the pope I would just like to hear the catholic side. It has not been published because it is from a history professor (Orthodox) that I met at bible study at the local orthodox church, I’m not looking to attack so calm down, I dont know enough about history in that region so I would like more.
 
I posted here because croatians will know more than most westerners.
 
I posted here because eastern catholic’s will know more about this and maybe know a good book or a defense that I can read, english is not a must I can translate with help from friends. Wow you guys are jumpy makes me think you are hiding something 😛
 
Im not attacking the pope I would just like to hear the catholic side. It has not been published because it is from a history professor (Orthodox) that I met at bible study at the local orthodox church, I’m not looking to attack so calm down, I dont know enough about history in that region so I would like more.
I’m Croatian, born and live in Croatia and I will be reading this topic with great interest. Please remember that Croatians are and were always Roman Catholics…after the great schism remained faithful to the Pope till today…What you said it’s true because it is hard to understand anything about this particular part of Europe without basic knowledge of the historical facts…before any futher discussion I suggest you give at least the name of the professor, if that is possible.🙂 .maybe you can provide the name of the local orthodox church…Croatians belong to the Middle- European and Mediterranean cultural heritage with the strong connections to Rome throughout the centuries…
God bless
 
Im not attacking the pope I would just like to hear the catholic side. It has not been published because it is from a history professor (Orthodox) that I met at bible study at the local orthodox church, I’m not looking to attack so calm down, I dont know enough about history in that region so I would like more.
Does this professor have a name or a university affiliation? If the book isn’t published, I can understand why he might not want his conclusions to come out before he finds a publisher, but has he published journal articles or other monographs that may have a bearing on this?

I don’t think the reactions seen here are because of anything out there to hide, but because the conclusions of a specific author from a specific book are mentioned. Basically, we’d like to know what the author said and not what you said the author said. For example would this author characterize his book as being pro-Serb? Does he imply or explicitly state a connection between Pius XII and the Ustasha? If he does what was that connection and what exactly does it mean for his argument? What axes does this author have to grind? Is he/she Serb? Whether you may thinks so or not all these questions have a bearing on the way history is written. History books are just a much a product of sober, analytical research as much as they are reflections of the author’s state of mind, beliefs and current situation.

ChadS
 
Wow you guys are jumpy makes me think you are hiding something 😛
In another incarnation of this sub-forum many of us have witnessed first hand how the Ustasha were used as polemic by some parties in an indictment against the Catholic Church as a whole. As this isn’t relevent to Eastern Catholic Churches in particular, and not every Eastern Catholic would, by virtue of his or her affiliation be an expert or well versed in modern 20th century Eastern Euro secular history, we do get jumpy.

Ask more about this in the apologetics forum. You will get more there.
 
Im not attacking the pope I would just like to hear the catholic side. It has not been published because it is from a history professor (Orthodox) that I met at bible study at the local orthodox church, I’m not looking to attack so calm down, I dont know enough about history in that region so I would like more.
My question is, what were you doing at a bible study at an Orthodox Church? :tsktsk: Your profile says “Catholic.” You do know that you are at least in a near occasion to sin if you haven’t already committed a sin.:crying: (I can’t judge as I wasn’t there, but you should know better.)

You need to find a Catholic Bible Study. 👍 If there isn’t one near you, start one with the aid of your local priest or deacon.
 
It could be a near occasion of sin if his Faith is weak.
I go to the Orthodox because they always embrace the early church fathers when discussing scripture and how they understood it. Ideas are always approached from the basis of the Trinity and the Divine Lirturgy. I have also learned quite a bit of Greek besides “Kyrie Elison” just as a bonus.😛 The Orthodox are very much more integrated with the history of the church bringing it life. If you go to a Catholic bible study it is about as deep as children’s wading pool and they suggest you take a theology course if you are really interested. I already know that God loves me and what the scripture means to me. So I dont find a point in going to them. I know that this does not represent the whole catholic church but part of me thinks that there is something wrong with a church that does not want or believe that all it parishioners are worthy of a better understanding and I have had that experience at multiple parishes as has my father who hates the idea of me going to an orthodox church. 😃
 
Croatians were accused of being nazi friends, many were persecuted because of the Ustasha regime, it was sufficient that you were a soldier of the regular Ustasha army, many were accused because they remained faithful to their Catholic faith. President Tito asked the now blessed Alojzije Stepinac to seperate the Church in Croatia from the Rome and to form National Croatian Catholic Church. He refused…he was charged of being Ustasha supporter and helper, died in his home prison…at that time he was the only imprisoned Cardinal of the Church. My point is that many accusations were done without proofs against Croatians and against the Church in general, especially agains Pope Pio XII. I think we should put an end to this and move on. The beatification was a miraculous sign from the Lord who sees evrything and judge everything. With all due respect for the Orthodox brothers and sisters I would never ask information about these historical facts from an Orthodox brother or sister or priest.
Just another thing, as personal testimony: in the late 50’s every student in Zagreb, the capital of Croatia, had to declare wether he/ she thinks that Cardinal was guilty of the charges or not…my father, who was a student at that time, told me about it… This is the proof how this issue was of great importance to the Communists. At school in history class we have been taught about Ustasha regime and its connections with the Church. During the Communist regime we weren’t allowed to talk openly about these things…We carried this Ustasha sign and seal throughout decades until 1990…Also I was at the beatification ceremony of Alojzije Stepinac in 1998, I was chosen to sang in the choir, and it was a deep mystical experience for me. First of all I saw closely JPII and, secondly I was relieved from the burden of dissapointment in the Catholic Church, which I had been carrying since my early childhood , burden of shame for the priests and nuns that, as I had been told and taught, were helping and supporting Ustasha and Nazi regimes…I prayed a lot for the intercession of blessed Alojzije and I received many graces. Sorry for the lenght of this post.:o .won’t happen again…sorry for my English mistakes:blush: , not my mother tongue and God bless you all
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top