Lord's name in vain Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmfiore
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jmfiore

Guest
For whatever reason today as I was heading to my fridge I blurted out, ‘oh my G–’ in Spanish without thinking of it.

I stopped in my tracks and was like why did I say that? I apologized and said an act of contrition.

I know using the Lord’s name out of context of worship/ praise is a mortal sin, but I don’t think this was cause it came out of left field for no reason…

Did I commit a mortal sin?
Should I go to confession for it?
You think I could still receive communion?

Even though I am unsure if it is a mortal sin or need confession I still feel bad about it even though it was accidental.

Thanks.
 
For whatever reason today as I was heading to my fridge I blurted out, ‘oh my G–’ in Spanish without thinking of it.

I stopped in my tracks and was like why did I say that? I apologized and said an act of contrition.

I know using the Lord’s name out of context of worship/ praise is a mortal sin, but I don’t think this was cause it came out of left field for no reason…

Did I commit a mortal sin?
Should I go to confession for it?
You think I could still receive communion?

Even though I am unsure if it is a mortal sin or need confession I still feel bad about it even though it was accidental.

Thanks.
I don’t think that accidentally using the Lord’s Name in vain is a mortal sin. However, I believe that you are right about it being wrong generally, and in particular when done will full reflection and full consent of the will. Too many Americans today take a lax view of using phrases like OMG and don’t worry about it for one second. The use of God’s Name and His Son’s Name in vain in popular American movies is truly tragic and says a lot about Americans and their culture. By contrast, in Russia, for example, the censors will blank out much cursing or profane language in the movies.
 
I agree with you but what about my scenario and my questions? 🙂
 
Did I commit a mortal sin?
Should I go to confession for it?
You think I could still receive communion?

Even though I am unsure if it is a mortal sin or need confession I still feel bad about it even though it was accidental.
An act of mortal sin requires three ingredients: 1) grave matter, 2) being fully informed about the sinful nature of the act and 3) giving full consent.

Did you commit a mortal sin? No, unless you were just kidding about it being “accidental” – more likely a spontaneous ejaculation. Which tells you something about what may be hidden inside, but it isn’t a mortal sin.

Like if you were thinking “I want to curse using God’s name right now and I really don’t need to but this is a good excuse and I don’t care that God hates it I’m going to do it anyway” – then there may be a problem

Should you go to confession for it? No. You may want to anyway and don’t let me be the one to stop you, but don’t “should” on yourself because only scrupulosity would say you “should”.

Should still receive Communion? I don’t see anything in the OP that even relates to the question.

Unless you believe it was wrong, and you are seeking the words of others to “talk you out of your self-criticism” and build your ego and say what you did was not a problem. In which case that is kind of icky because then you would be trying to deceive or fish for affirmation for what you think is wrong. That would be self-aggrandizing, rather than effacement “deny yourself” Jesus recommends. If that’s the case it may indicate some work to be done not for cursing, but for misrepresenting yourself on behalf of your own ego (carnal mind).
 
An act of mortal sin requires three ingredients: 1) grave matter, 2) being fully informed about the sinful nature of the act and 3) giving full consent.

Did you commit a mortal sin? No, unless you were just kidding about it being “accidental” – more likely a spontaneous ejaculation. Which tells you something about what may be hidden inside, but it isn’t a mortal sin.

Like if you were thinking “I want to curse using God’s name right now and I really don’t need to but this is a good excuse and I don’t care that God hates it I’m going to do it anyway” – then there may be a problem

Should you go to confession for it? No. You may want to anyway and don’t let me be the one to stop you, but don’t “should” on yourself because only scrupulosity would say you “should”.

Should still receive Communion? I don’t see anything in the OP that even relates to the question.

Unless you believe it was wrong, and you are seeking the words of others to “talk you out of your self-criticism” and build your ego and say what you did was not a problem. In which case that is kind of icky because then you would be trying to deceive or fish for affirmation for what you think is wrong. That would be self-aggrandizing, rather than effacement “deny yourself” Jesus recommends. If that’s the case it may indicate some work to be done not for cursing, but for misrepresenting yourself on behalf of your own ego (carnal mind).
I wasn’t kidding about it being accidental, I don’t post on here to pull chains or get reactions.

What would the spontaneous ejaculation tell me about what’s inside? – expand on that please.

Cursing using the Lord’s name was one of the habits I started to break 3 years ago when I came back into my faith, I occasionally slip up out of the blue as I had with this instance.

I planned on bringing it up at my next confession I was just wondering if it had to be sooner than later in the week.

Communion relates to the OP in the sense that I can’t receive it if in a state of mortal sin and thus need to go to confession first…

I do believe it was wrong but I am asking people if I am over-thinking it or if what I did was enough for me to not receive communion and require reconciliation. I’m not trying to deceive or fish for anything, just asking a question.

And what does, “That would be self-aggrandizing, rather than effacement “deny yourself” Jesus recommends. If that’s the case it may indicate some work to be done not for cursing, but for misrepresenting yourself on behalf of your own ego (carnal mind).” mean? I don’t understand what you are trying to say here, please explain.

Thanks for the reply.
 
I wasn’t kidding about it being accidental, I don’t post on here to pull chains or get reactions.
I didn’t think you were; I was just trying to cover the bases. 👍
What would the spontaneous ejaculation tell me about what’s inside? – expand on that please.
There is a reference by Jesus about it being about what comes out of the mouth, not what goes in, that defile. My thoughts are that when you aren’t consciously thinking about what you say, there is a certain kind of “honesty” that wouldn’t have shown itself if you were actually trying to control it.
Cursing using the Lord’s name was one of the habits I started to break 3 years ago when I came back into my faith, I occasionally slip up out of the blue as I had with this instance.
I planned on bringing it up at my next confession I was just wondering if it had to be sooner than later in the week.
Well now you’re talking about a pattern it sounds like, and it might be good to discuss with a priest. For myself, I prefer face to face meetings outside the confessional with my pastor, because he’s really great and he can take time to coach me in strategy. If you don’t have that kind of hookup, and I know I’m fortunate to have it because my last pastor was VERY different and kind of untouchable it seemed like, at least by me.

Personally, I have an issue with the whole “name in vain” thing becoming equated to “using dirty language” to the point it becomes an issue for division and separation. I recognize that here you have named “God” specifically, but what’s to say that indicates anything other than God being on your mind, when this happens? What if you had yelled “Rumpelstiltskin” or “Satan” or something?
Communion relates to the OP in the sense that I can’t receive it if in a state of mortal sin and thus need to go to confession first…
Right. My point was that I didn’t see anything in the OP that made me think you were even close to being at a point of mortal sin, so the answer seemed clear. Now with the additional information it’s making more sense why you asked.
I do believe it was wrong but I am asking people if I am over-thinking it or if what I did was enough for me to not receive communion and require reconciliation. I’m not trying to deceive or fish for anything, just asking a question.
Right. You do not sound “paranoid” though to me afa I can tell from here, so I don’t consider this “overthinking” the problem. You’re gathering opinions on something that is important to you.

Actually I get kind of annoyed sometimes when people tell me I’m “overthinking” something. If it is all that simple, then let them give me a simple answer or a simple way to look at it. If I’m paranoid and can’t hear reason because of it, then I’d say “negative overthinking” might be a tempting term to apply.
And what does, “That would be self-aggrandizing, rather than effacement “deny yourself” Jesus recommends. If that’s the case it may indicate some work to be done not for cursing, but for misrepresenting yourself on behalf of your own ego (carnal mind).” mean? I don’t understand what you are trying to say here, please explain.
Thanks for the reply.
I’m pretty sensitive to very subtle interior things, and for me I suggest my “Dark Night” experiences have made me so. Sometimes I pick up on things that aren’t there, but more likely I miss things that are – whether they come out of my own mouth or others.

The “self-aggrandizing” is kind of indirect, and I’m a bit surprised I used that word. I’m trying to remember the flavor the triggered its recall and use. It probably came from my mind running all the ways I could imagine that you would be intentionally deceiving. These kinds of things are described in the first sections of the book Dark Night, discussing the nuances and behavior of pride in a soul.

If there was “deception” I was looking for very subtle and almost hidden things, and having found one (not applied to you but potentially for anyone) it occurs to me that one can know something is wrong, and look for others to make them feel better about it. So if you let others convince you that it’s OK, (informational conformity – see the Asch conformity experiment) then you have insulated yourself from your own belief. If you believe it’s OK but are still raising the issue – there is a possibility a soul in that situation may be running a meme “see I care about every detail”. I see none of this in your OP, but include them so as not to come across denying that it’s an issue, simply on the basis that from looking at the outside, I don’t see a sin here.

So if you want to talk to the priest about it, that’s great – I encourage you to find a time to discuss outside the confessional but since this is a pattern then maybe you’d better go anyway. Some think that several venial sins add up to a mortal sin, but I don’t think it’s a math formula as much as an inventory of the inner state that may be showing themselves on the outside.

Please consider a Christian comedian talking about swearing. It kinds of explains the “spontaneous” aspect of the remarks. I agree with almost all he says, except for that Protestant-ish bit about the rapture… :rolleyes:

Christians Don’t Have curse Words

That said, Jesus said to be perfect even as our Father in heaven is perfect. Personally I don’t have a problem using “Bad Language” except to the degree it offends others around me, and what it indicates about the way I think of things if it is hard for me to control.

Oh yes and I don’t buy that “substitute word” thing, because of my view toward the interior. If you suddenly yell something in an angry voice, to me the word at that point is just a tool and not the problem in and of itself.
 
Here is the part about pride from St. John of the Cross. I think you’ll see how this pride really works itself through the entire psyche and can control even very subtle things.

Reference: The Dark Night of the Soul

1.3. The soul finds its joy, therefore, in spending lengthy periods at
prayer, perhaps even entire nights; its penances are pleasures; its fasts,
happiness; and the sacraments and spiritual conversations are its
consolations. Although spiritual persons do practice these exercises with
great profit and persistence, and are very careful about them, spiritually
speaking, they conduct themselves in a very weak and imperfect manner.
Since their motivation in their spiritual works and exercises is the
consolation and satisfaction they experience in them, and since they have
not been conditioned by the arduous struggle of practicing virtue, they
possess many faults and imperfections in the discharge of their spiritual
activities. Assuredly, since everyone’s actions are in direct conformity
with the habit of perfection that has been acquired, and since these
persons have not had time to acquire those firm habits, their work must of
necessity be feeble, like that of weak children.

1.3.(2). For a clearer understanding of this and of how truly imperfect
beginners are, insofar as they practice virtue readily because of the
satisfaction attached to it, we will describe, using the seven capital
vices as our basis, some of the numerous imperfections beginners commit.
Thus we will clearly see how very similar their deeds are to those of
children. The benefits of the dark night will become evident, since it
cleanses and purifies the soul of all these imperfections.

CHAPTER 2
  1. Some of the imperfections of pride possessed by beginners.
2.1. These beginners feel so fervent and diligent in their spiritual
exercises and undertakings that a certain kind of secret pride is generated
in them that begets a complacency with themselves and their
accomplishments, even though holy works do of their very nature cause
humility. Then they develop a somewhat vain – at times very vain – desire
to speak of spiritual things in others’ presence, and sometimes even to
instruct rather than be instructed; in their hearts they condemn others who
do not seem to have the kind of devotion they would like them to have, and
sometimes they give expression to this criticism like the pharisee who
despised the publican while he boasted and praised God for the good deeds
he himself accomplished [Lk. 18:11-12].1

2.2. The devil, desiring the growth of pride and presumption in these
beginners, often increases their fervor and readiness to perform such
works, and other ones, too. For he is quite aware that all these works and
virtues are not only worthless for them, but even become vices. Some of
these persons become so evil-minded that they do not want anyone except
themselves to appear holy; and so by both word and deed they condemn and
detract others whenever the occasion arises, seeing the little splinter in
their brother’s eye and failing to consider the wooden beam in their own
eye [Mt. 7:3]; they strain at the other’s gnat and swallow their own camel
[Mt. 23:24].

2.3. And when at times their spiritual directors, their confessors, or
their superiors disapprove their spirit and method of procedure, they feel
that these directors do not understand, or perhaps that this failure to
approve derives from a lack of holiness, since they want these directors to
regard their conduct with esteem and praise. So they quickly search for
some other spiritual advisor more to their liking, someone who will
congratulate them and be impressed by their deeds; and they flee, as they
would death, those who attempt to place them on the safe road by forbidding
these things – and sometimes they even become hostile toward such
spiritual directors. Frequently, in their presumption, they make many
resolutions but accomplish very little. Sometimes they want others to
recognize their spirit and devotion, and as a result occasionally contrive
to make some manifestations of it, such as movements, sighs, and other
ceremonies; sometimes, with the assistance of the devil, they experience
raptures, more often in public than in private, and they are quite pleased,
and often eager, for others to take notice of these.

2.4. Many want to be the favorites of their confessors, and thus they are
consumed by a thousand envies and disquietudes. Embarrassment forbids them
from relating their sins clearly, lest their reputation diminish in their
confessor’s eyes. They confess their sins in the most favorable light so as
to appear better than they actually are, and thus they approach the
confessional to excuse themselves rather than accuse themselves. Sometimes
they confess the evil things they do to a different confessor so that their
own confessor might think they commit no sins at all. Therefore, in their
desire to appear holy, they enjoy relating their good behavior to their
confessor, and in such careful terms that these good deeds appear greater
than they actually are. It would be more humble of them, as we will point
out later,2 to make light of the good they do and to wish that no one,
neither their confessor nor anybody else, should consider it of any
importance at all.

2.5. Sometimes they minimize their faults, and at other times they become
discouraged by them, since they felt they were already saints, and they
become impatient and angry with themselves, which is yet another fault.

^^^ really the first two chapters are all good. I clipped them to what fit in one post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top