A
Allegra
Guest
Where is the love? 
Hey, I’m prone to wordiness too. By itself, it’s not the worst thing in the world.I have exceeded the time limit for editing my posts. The best I can hope for is that a Moderator can do something about my word vomit.
Wait, am I the only one who wooed his wife with the “Horst Wessel” song?And, just in general, if the words “Mein Kampf” appear in a love letter…it’s still in need of editing. Most women don’t find discussions of Hitler to be the most romantic thing in the world.
I ask this question repeatedly because I have never received an answer I want to hear. I lie awake at night trying to reconcile Thomistic Soteriology with what I feel to be just. I don’t want to believe in anything but Catholicism because of St. Thomas Aquinas’ excellent Moral Theology. However the Systematic Theology seems to be an Ouroboros that is consuming itself. I want an explanation that will enable me to truly accept Catholicism without being a Doctrinal Cafeteria Catholic. I reiterate, if the totality of the elect is chosen before the creation of the Universe, whether in the Dominican’s Thomism or the Jesuit’s Molinism, how can those not chosen by God have any chance at salvation. Arminianism offers a solution to all the mentioned problems with Resistible Grace, Conditional Election, Libertarian Free Will, Equal/Impartial/Undifferentiated love for all but the Catholic Church seems to not consider it correct. The inkling of a desire to convert to Arminian Protestantism is welling up within me.Here you go again! Really, what is this in response to? It is not relevant to anything anyone said. It’s like you have no filter.
Stop, please. This is not the topic of your thread. You need, on this thread and in life to stay on topic. Unsubscribing.I ask this question repeatedly because I have never received an answer I want to hear. I lie awake at night trying to reconcile Thomistic Soteriology with what I feel to be just. I don’t want to believe in anything but Catholicism because of St. Thomas Aquinas’ excellent Moral Theology. However the Systematic Theology seems to be an Ouroboros that is consuming itself. I want an explanation that will enable me to truly accept Catholicism without being a Doctrinal Cafeteria Catholic. I reiterate, if the totality of the elect is chosen before the creation of the Universe, whether in the Dominican’s Thomism or the Jesuit’s Molinism, how can those not chosen by God have any chance at salvation. Arminianism offers a solution to all the mentioned problems with Resistible Grace, Conditional Election, Libertarian Free Will, Equal/Impartial/Undifferentiated love for all but the Catholic Church seems to not consider it correct. The inkling of a desire to convert to Arminian Protestantism is welling up within me.
That’s all well and good, but do you see how that thought just sort of came out of left field with no apparent connection to what we had been talking about? Serious question: has anyone ever raised the possibility with you that you might be bipolar?I apologize for hijacking the thread. I am also sorry if you read something you didn’t want to read. I cannot within good conscience accept an entire way of life if I am not certain beyond a reasonable doubt that it is correct. I trust in the Grace and Providence of God but I sincerely believe he would want us to meticulously analyze His Revelation and determine the truth, nothing less. I want to believe the Magisterium, but until I receive an answer to this Doctrinal question that has plagued me for years, I will not be satisfied.
CAF does have a Philosophy forum. You may find good conversation about this topic there, or additional resources to address this particular issue.I apologize for hijacking the thread. I am also sorry if you read something you didn’t want to read. I cannot within good conscience accept an entire way of life if I am not certain beyond a reasonable doubt that it is correct. I trust in the Grace and Providence of God but I sincerely believe he would want us to meticulously analyze His Revelation and determine the truth, nothing less. I want to believe the Magisterium, but until I receive an answer to this Doctrinal question that has plagued me for years, I will not be satisfied.
The DSM V might as well be my life story. The therapist that my family’s insurance plan provides turns out to be a nominal Catholic who would rather not consider Doctrinal Issues. I don’t have the heart to ask my Hindu parents to pay out of pocket for a Catholic therapist.That’s all well and good, but do you see how that thought just sort of came out of left field with no apparent connection to what we had been talking about? Serious question: has anyone ever raised the possibility with you that you might be bipolar?
Very confusingTo me, it read like it was part resume, part biography, part musing, and part confusing.
Nothing like a love letter at all.
Why would your therapist’s religious beliefs be relevant in the slightest? The purpose of a therapist is to treat any mental health/social interaction issues, not debate doctrinal issues. If you want to discuss theology, seek out a theologian. Presumably you wouldn’t abstain from going to the dentist just because the dentist won’t discuss Thomist theology with you.The DSM V might as well be my life story. The therapist that my family’s insurance plan provides turns out to be a nominal Catholic who would rather not consider Doctrinal Issues. I don’t have the heart to ask my Hindu parents to pay out of pocket for a Catholic therapist.
The link between my question and brassring’s analysis of my situation is that I strongly associate that question with the struggle within myself to find meaning for my life.
Medical science used to believe that leeches would drain sickness out of the blood. As recently as the 18th century, doctors would attempt to cure stuttering by cutting off half the patient’s tongue. The fact that there were some kooky ideas in the past does not mean that medical science as a whole should be discarded.Thank you for the responses. I want to begin by saying what I am going to post is heretical and contains graphic imagery and any one who does not wish to read objectionable content should not.
I very well could be on the Autism Spectrum, but I stopped believing in the DSM when I learned it used to classify Same Sex Attraction as a mental disorder. I could go into an entire debate about how psychiatric classifications, while they have much good, lead to great stigma and harm.
Right.Medical science used to believe that leeches would drain sickness out of the blood. As recently as the 18th century, doctors would attempt to cure stuttering by cutting off half the patient’s tongue. The fact that there were some kooky ideas in the past does not mean that medical science as a whole should be discarded.
So too with psychiatric medicine. The fact that the DSM has evolved does not mean that psychiatric medicine is useless.
I strongly urge you to seek some treatment. I’m not saying that you’re crazy or you need to be locked in a padded room. But I do think you’d benefit from talking to someone professional and seeing if some treatment might be advantageous to you.
i’m your counter-part. i almost didn’t read all the title, instead.I did read all of this.
I’m not sure I fully understand your purpose in posting this here, but whatever happens, I do not recommend you share it with any special ladies who might cross your path. It does not read much like a love letter, despite your thread title.
Please be assured of my prayers as you complete your studies.
Why would you discuss doctrinal issues with your therapist?The DSM V might as well be my life story. The therapist that my family’s insurance plan provides turns out to be a nominal Catholic who would rather not consider Doctrinal Issues. I don’t have the heart to ask my Hindu parents to pay out of pocket for a Catholic therapist.
The link between my question and brassring’s analysis of my situation is that I strongly associate that question with the struggle within myself to find meaning for my life.