I’m not sure what you mean. The website of her official cause appears to be this one:
and it looks similar to other cause websites for other persons with an active cause. The cause is operated by an approved Pious Association and contains the usual things like a detailed biography of the saint, activities pertaining to “evidence of cult” (such as retreats, prayers etc) and discussion of the restoration of her home as a pilgrimage site. You see the same type of thing on other websites for Servants of God. The site also has a fairly extensive explanation of her writings, probably because of the past controversy.
I personally am not a big follower of Luisa Piccaretta, not because I don’t think she was holy, but because one can only follow so many saints and holy persons, and other persons are speaking more strongly to me at this point. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with reading her work, but given that the Church is still evaluating it, one must be prepared for whatever the Church may (or may not) pronounce about it in the end…which could take way beyond any of our lifetimes to be honest.
Of course, one is also not required to read it or accept it as it’s private revelation.
But at the same time, if someone has an open cause, which I believe at this point has gone to Rome as of 2005, people are going to be reading and learning about the holy person as part of the natural progression of the cause, if God wills it to progress.
I would expect that even if she were to become a saint, there would still be people expressing discomfort with some part of her writings, just as they currently do with St. Faustina and others. And that’s okay, as long as they don’t insist that everybody else agree with their discomfort.