G
garysibio
Guest
I suspect that “bosom of Abraham,” Paradise" and “Sheol” are all the same place.I believe the thief was in the bosom of Abraham which is also referred to in scripture as paradise.
Gary
I suspect that “bosom of Abraham,” Paradise" and “Sheol” are all the same place.I believe the thief was in the bosom of Abraham which is also referred to in scripture as paradise.
True, but they would have to be venial sins. If a person died in a state of mortal sin, he would not go to Purgatory.Along with 1 Cor 3:15, Mt 12:32 has also been cited as a reference to purgatory (purgation). “…whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.”…introducing the possibility that some sins are forgiven in the next life.
Let me get this straight. Before the Ascension no-one could go to Heaven, they had to go to Sheol? And when Christ ascended into Heaven the chaps in Sheol could go to Heaven, and Christians could go to Heaven too?Eph 4:8 reads, “Therefore it says, ‘When he ascended on high he led a host of captives, and he gave gifts to men.’” I suspect that, even though Jesus was the first to enter Heaven, He did not do so alone. He led the captives in Sheol to Heaven.
Gary
I believe it’s also called Limbo of the Fathers.I suspect that “bosom of Abraham,” Paradise" and “Sheol” are all the same place.
Gary
First of all, what definition of PARADISE is your friend using?Luke 23:43
Vulgata
Douay-Rheims
My protestant friend used this quote to try to disprove Purgatory, saying this was his biggest problem with it.
He said that if Purgatory was true then this man wouldn’t be in Paradise “this day” it would be several days in the future.
He thinks it means Heaven (actually my dictionary says that too, but the dictionary’s not written by theologians, is it), but I know now were talking about sheol, or Limbo of the Fathers. So it seems that verse has nothing to do with Purgatory at all.First of all, what definition of PARADISE is your friend using?
Remember, purgatory is for the “saved.” Hell is for the damned.
This was the first verse I looked up in my protestant “Strong’s Concordance” and I thought it proved purgatory, rather than disproved it. Your friend needs to realize that he doesn’t know all the definitions of every word in the Bible, even if he thinks he does. We assume we know more than we do. Upon closer look, we surprise ourselves.
Look up PARADISE.
=AlanF;4974905]Luke 23:43
Vulgata
Douay-Rheims
My protestant friend used this quote to try to disprove Purgatory, saying this was his biggest problem with it.
He said that if Purgatory was true then this man wouldn’t be in Paradise “this day” it would be several days in the future.
Scripture Catholic says there was no punctuation in the original language so it said “I say to you this day” rather than “I say to you, this day…”; but I’d rather not have to refer to other translations.
Cute, but your friend does not win a “Cuppy doll”!So, how is this verse to be interpreted? How can I prove that Purgatory does exist despite this?
Here’s how I understand it:Let me get this straight. Before the Ascension no-one could go to Heaven, they had to go to Sheol? And when Christ ascended into Heaven the chaps in Sheol could go to Heaven, and Christians could go to Heaven too?
What do you mean when you say “He led the captives in Sheol to Heaven.”? Did they ascend at the same time from Earth? Or did they go straight from Sheol? Heiscominginthe seems to be suggesting the former because he says Jesus led the captives out of Sheol when he was in there, perhaps that is what Matthew 27:52 means: “And the graves were opened: and many bodies of the saints that had slept arose”.
This is quite confusing to me.
no time to read all posts…Luke 23:43
Vulgata
Douay-Rheims
My protestant friend used this quote to try to disprove Purgatory, saying this was his biggest problem with it.
He said that if Purgatory was true then this man wouldn’t be in Paradise “this day” it would be several days in the future.
Scripture Catholic says there was no punctuation in the original language so it said “I say to you this day” rather than “I say to you, this day…”; but I’d rather not have to refer to other translations.
So, how is this verse to be interpreted? How can I prove that Purgatory does exist despite this?
Jesus was the first to get to heaven, and then all the righteous dead followed and await to return with him on the day of resurrection to be reunited with the mortal bodies that sleep in the earth and will be resurrected from corruptible to in corruptible.The question now is what happened to the Good Thief. We know he went to Limbo but when did he finally get to Heaven? When did the other Old Testament Saints get into Heaven? What happened to a Christian who died immediately after Christ’s death?
I reread this to answer your question and saw something I had never seen before: Although the dead apparently came back to life when Jesus died on the cross, they didn’t leave their tombs until after the resurrection. I always thought they came out when Jesus died.
I don’t believe it was the souls of the OT dead that returned to their bodies. I believe it was the righteous who died from the time Jesus died til his ascention. Those who’s bodies were in the tomb but a short time. Yet, the question that remains is did these saints have their eternal bodies? That would mean there would have to be more then one resurrection of the dead, would it not?Apparently the souls of the OT saints returned to their bodies for a time. The Bible does not go into a lot of detail about what happened but, at some point, they must have left their bodies and returned to Sheol or were then led into Heaven by Jesus. This would not have been immediately after the resurrection since they roamed around Jerusalem for a while and Jesus told Mary that He had not yet ascended to the Father (John 20:17).
Why is it any more likely that they died after Jesus? The soul leaves the body quickly after death. Either way, the soul would have to return to the body. I’m not so sure they had to face physical death again in the sense that they had to be killed. It might be that their souls just left their bodies after a while.I don’t believe it was the souls of the OT dead that returned to their bodies. I believe it was the righteous who died from the time Jesus died til his ascention. Those who’s bodies were in the tomb but a short time. Yet, the question that remains is did these saints have their eternal bodies? That would mean there would have to be more then one resurrection of the dead, would it not?
So if these saints did not have their eternal bodies, they may of had to face physical death once more. Yet, having the knowledge of what happened and seeing the power of God, facing physical death a second time would be of little matter.
Why is it any more likely that they died after Jesus? The soul leaves the body quickly after death. Either way, the soul would have to return to the body. I’m not so sure they had to face physical death again in the sense that they had to be killed. It might be that their souls just left their bodies after a while.
Truth is, we are given next to no information about this so it’s difficult, if not impossible, to be dogmatic about the exact events. It’s just speculation and not very profitable speculation at that.
The important thing to remember is Jesus had to defeat death. And how did he do that? By living a life without sin, being the unblemished lamb, by being put to death and by being resurrected.Gary
Jesus defeated death by rising from the dead. His sinless life meant that He was the spotless Lamb whose blood was shed for our redemption. I’m not denying the resurrection when I say that Jesus told Mary He had not yet gone to the Father. He couldn’t be talking to Mary at all if He hadn’t resurrected.The important thing to remember is Jesus had to defeat death. And how did he do that? By living a life without sin, being the unblemished lamb, by being put to death and by being resurrected.
Jesus told Mary not to touch him because he had not ascended unto the Father. But I believe he was resurrected just the same.
I believe those who came back to life were not dead very long which would be logical since the body decomposes with the exception of the Lord.
Yet, there is not much historical proof to assert any conclusion whether those who had been brought back to life were in their newly incorruptible bodies. Yet, I lean toward the notion they were not since biblical reference speaks of one resurrection if I am not mistaken, with the exception of the Lord. He was firstborn from the dead.
Colossians 1:18 He is the head of the body, the assembly, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.
=heiscominginthe;4985574]I don’t believe it was the souls of the OT dead that returned to their bodies. I believe it was the righteous who died from the time Jesus died til his ascention. Those who’s bodies were in the tomb but a short time. Yet, the question that remains is did these saints have their eternal bodies? That would mean there would have to be more then one resurrection of the dead, would it not?
**… The earth quaked. How far this earthquake was extended, is uncertain. — The rocks were rent, and the graves were opened: and many bodies of the saints … **arose. St. Jerome takes notice, that these saints did not rise with their bodies till after Christ was risen; and so it follows, that going out of the graves, after the resurrection, they came into the holy city, (i.e. into Jerusalem) and appeared to many. (Witham) — This event was a prophecy of the fatal destruction that was shortly to fall upon the temple; and also, that it should henceforth give place to things more noble and sublime. It likewise shews that greatness of Christ’s power. (St. Chrysostom, hom. lxxxix.)So if these saints did not have their eternal bodies, they may of had to face physical death once more. Yet, having the knowledge of what happened and seeing the power of God, facing physical death a second time would be of little matter.
Jesus defeated death by rising from the dead. His sinless life meant that He was the spotless Lamb whose blood was shed for our redemption. I’m not denying the resurrection when I say that Jesus told Mary He had not yet gone to the Father. He couldn’t be talking to Mary at all if He hadn’t resurrected.
AMEN.Gary
Friends we should accept that:
Isaiah 55:6 “Seek the LORD while he may be found, call upon him while he is near; 7 let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts; let him return to the LORD, that he may have mercy on him, and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. 8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, says the LORD. 9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts”
Wonder post, thanks PJMLove and prayers,
God Bless you!
It’s this ‘Christ leading the saints into Heaven’ business I don’t quite understand. Christ defeated death by his Resurrection, but it is my understanding that He went to Heaven forty days later at His Ascension, if He had to be the first into Heaven and lead everyone else in wouldn’t they have to wait the forty days till the Ascension; but if that is so the Gospels still only speak on Jesus ascending, they don’t mention anyone else to be seen to ascend.Jesus was the first to get to heaven, and then all the righteous dead followed and await to return with him on the day of resurrection to be reunited with the mortal bodies that sleep in the earth and will be resurrected from corruptible to in corruptible.
The thief had to go to the bosom of Abraham with Jesus, but was taken to heaven once Christ defeated death.
And all will return on the day of resurrction with Jesus to be given their eternal body.
1 Thess. 4:14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
The bodies of the righteous dead sleep, but their souls/ spirits are with the Lord.
If the saints were resurrected at the moment Christ died, how would the Good Thief fit into that? Since he died after Christ it seems he would have been alone in Limbo with Christ when all the other saints had resurrected. Which seems odd.I reread this to answer your question and saw something I had never seen before: Although the dead apparently came back to life when Jesus died on the cross, they didn’t leave their tombs until after the resurrection. I always thought they came out when Jesus died.
Apparently the souls of the OT saints returned to their bodies for a time. The Bible does not go into a lot of detail about what happened but, at some point, they must have left their bodies and returned to Sheol or were then led into Heaven by Jesus. This would not have been immediately after the resurrection since they roamed around Jerusalem for a while and Jesus told Mary that He had not yet ascended to the Father (John 20:17).
I hope I have not confused you even further.
Gary
It’s this ‘Christ leading the saints into Heaven’ business I don’t quite understand. Christ defeated death by his Resurrection, but it is my understanding that He went to Heaven forty days later at His Ascension, if He had to be the first into Heaven and lead everyone else in wouldn’t they have to wait the forty days till the Ascension; but if that is so the Gospels still only speak on Jesus ascending, they don’t mention anyone else to be seen to ascend.
Remember that Jesus appeared to Mary and told her not to touch him for he had not yet assended unto his Father.So I’m still confused about whether the Good Thief made it to Heaven three days after his crucifixion or forty three days after.
The saints could not preceed Jesus into heaven. Jesus preceeded them. It is written that Jesus was the firstborn from the dead.If the saints were resurrected at the moment Christ died, how would the Good Thief fit into that? Since he died after Christ it seems he would have been alone in Limbo with Christ when all the other saints had resurrected. Which seems odd.
PJM posted this from St John Chrysostom: "The earth quaked. How far this earthquake was extended, is uncertain. — The rocks were rent, and the graves were opened: and many bodies of the saints … arose. St. Jerome takes notice, that these saints did not rise with their bodies till after Christ was risen; and so it follows, that going out of the graves, after the resurrection, they came into the holy city, (i.e. into Jerusalem) and appeared to many. (Witham) — This event was a prophecy of the fatal destruction that was shortly to fall upon the temple; and also, that it should henceforth give place to things more noble and sublime. It likewise shews that greatness of Christ’s power. (St. Chrysostom, hom. lxxxix.)Remember that Jesus appeared to Mary and told her not to touch him for he had not yet assended unto his Father.
Then he appeared to the apostles and they were able to touch him, especially Thomas who Jesus told to feel the holes in his hands and feet.
The saints could not preceed Jesus into heaven. Jesus preceeded them. It is written that Jesus was the firstborn from the dead.
As for those in hell being resurrected, I am not quite sure that is the word we want to use since it was only their souls/spirits that were rescued from hell. When we talk about those who die in Christ, it is because they died in the flesh, but are alive in spirit and await the day of resurrection when they will reunited with their earthly bodies that have been changed from corruptible to incorruptible.
If the dead saints were already resurrected, we wouldn’t refer to them as the dead in Christ, they would be referred to as the resurrected in Christ.
So in between that time Jesus appeared to Mary and the time he appeared to the apostles, Jesus assended to the Lord and took the once captive souls with him.