Luther & NT Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter DVina
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

DVina

Guest
As I am not very familiar with any of Luther’s writings, I am hoping someone can give me a reference…

Many Protestants claim that the Reformation was an attempt to return the Church to its New Testament forms and foundations. I am sure that is not so regarding the Church of England, but am wondering if Luther made any such assertions. It just seems unlikely to me and I thought this line of thought was a much more recent development in Protestantism.
 
One thing of interest is Luther got married and Henry the Eight got remarried.

Both John the Baptist and Thomas More died defending Marriage. Jesus said John was a great prophet.

I hope marriage will come back from 50%. Only non contracepting catholics are over 90%. I guess Jesus could see John the Baptist was a prophet for our day.

Brother John
 
Here are some quotes from Luther showing that he believed the Catholic Church was a false Church and his followers comprised the true, ancient Church. These quotes are from this website:

socrates58.blogspot.com/2006/06/did-martin-luther-regard-roman.html

… . . they lead all the souls in the world astray . . . just as they reject all the fathers and theologians from their canons, so we reject them from the Church and the Scriptures . . . Now they want to put us out of the Church and the Scriptures, and they cannot get in themselves! . . .

Indeed, since there is nothing in-between, we must be the church of Christ and they the devil’s church, or vice versa. Therefore it all turns on proving which is the true church . . . One part must be false and untrue . . . The Lord Christ commands us not to embrace the false church.

They allege that we have fallen away from the holy church and set up a new church . . . since they themselves boast that they are the church, it is for them to prove that they are . . . But if they cannot prove it . . . they are not the church and . . . we cannot be heretics since we have fallen away from what is not the true church. Indeed, since there is nothing in-between, we must be the church of Christ and they the devil’s church, or vice versa. Therefore it all turns on proving which is the true church . . . One part must be false and untrue . . . The Lord Christ commands us not to embrace the false church. (pp. 193-194)

We have proved that we are the true, ancient church . . . Now you, too, papists, prove that you are the true church or are like it. You cannot do it. But I will prove that you are the new false church, which is in everything apostate, separated from the true, ancient church, thus becoming Satan’s synagogue. (p. 199)

You do not hold to the original, ancient baptism, for you have invented many other new baptisms, teaching that the original baptism is subsequently lost through sin . . . For where there is no baptism, the sacraments, the keys, and everything else are of no avail. (p. 199)

Who can tell all the abominable innovations you have devised in the sacred and holy sacrament of the body and blood of Christ? . . . You have silenced and obliterated the remembrance of Christ . . . [this] makes you a new apostate heretical church, yes, the arch-whore of the devil and the synagogue of hell. For this thing is so hopelessly and abysmally evil . . . the vilest cesspool that the devil has on earth. (pp. 201-202)

We are certainly the true, ancient church, without any whoredom or innovation. (p. 205)

We too were formerly stuck in the behind of this hellish whore, this new church of the pope . . . we regret having spent so much time and energy in that vile hole. But God be praised and thanked that he rescued us from the scarlet whore. (p. 206)

We acknowledge not only that you have, with us, come from the true church and been washed and made clean in baptism . . . but also that you are in the church and remain in it . . . But you are no longer of the church, or members of the church, for in this holy church of God you are building your own new apostate church, the devil’s brothel, with limitless whoredom, idolatry, and innovation. (pp. 209-210)
 
As I am not very familiar with any of Luther’s writings, I am hoping someone can give me a reference…

Many Protestants claim that the Reformation was an attempt to return the Church to its New Testament forms and foundations. I am sure that is not so regarding the Church of England, but am wondering if Luther made any such assertions. It just seems unlikely to me and I thought this line of thought was a much more recent development in Protestantism.
Hello DVina,

Luther quotes Jesus in New Testament scriptures as his “opponant”.

Martin Luther
The doctrine of our opponents
is similar to that of the false apostles in Paul’s day.Our opponents teach, "If you want to live unto God, you must live after the Law, for it is written, Do this and thou shalt live."

Quoted from Project Wittenberg, Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians, (1535) by Martin Luther, Chapter 2 v 19
iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/wittenberg/luther/gal/web/gal2-17.html
NAB MAT 19:16

“Teacher, what good must I do to possess everlasting life?” He answered, “Why do you question me about what is good? There is One who is good. If you wish to enter into life, keep the commandments.” “Which ones?” he asked. Jesus replied “You shall not kill”; ‘You shall not commit adultery’; ‘You shall not steal’; ‘You shall not bear false witness’; ‘Honor your father and mother’; and ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’" NAB LUK 10:25
"Teacher, what must I do to inherit everlasting life?" Jesus answered him:
"What is written in the law? How do you read it?" He replied:

"You shall love the Lord your God
**with all your heart, **
**with all your soul, **
**with all your strength, **
**and with all your mind; **
and your neighbor as yourself."
Jesus said,
“You have answered correctly. Do this and you shall live.”
 
Many Protestants claim that the Reformation was an attempt to return the Church to its New Testament forms and foundations. I am sure that is not so regarding the Church of England, but am wondering if Luther made any such assertions. It just seems unlikely to me and I thought this line of thought was a much more recent development in Protestantism.
Though I am no historian, I don’t think there is any reason to disbelieve that Luther sincerely felt that he was restoring the Church to its old purity.

Had his program succeeded he would now be a very great saint. Had it failed only a few specialist would have heard of him. In fact Luther was partially successful, which has given us a huge problem which remains until this day.

Luther was no historian either, and so his views about the first century church were often either wrong or hopelessly naive. However an intelligent Protestant could say “we are not a Reformed church, we are a reforming church”. Protestants themselves are divided, some want a return to the first century, others see history as a gradual progression to an equal rights model of ethics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top