W
wumpiesmommy
Guest
These 2 I know nothing about. Just wondering what’s different from us.
Lutheran belief is summed up in the unaltered Augsburg Confession.These 2 I know nothing about. Just wondering what’s different from us.
Yes, except there are 3 main Lutheran Denominations in the US alone, plus many smaller ones. There are some major differences between the three major ones, take women and communion for example:Lutheran belief is summed up in the unaltered Augsburg Confession.
Indeed. But the differences of the LCMS and WELS have nothing to do with how we interpret the confessions. We are on the same page in this regard. The confessions don’t address unit or pulpit fellowship so it’s up to the synods to decide which one they want.Yes, except there are 3 main Lutheran Denominations in the US alone, plus many smaller ones. There are some major differences between the three major ones, take women and communion for example:
Wisconsin Synod (WELS): Women cannot teach or lead men in church. Communion is generally quite closed, often requiring the permission of each pastor to participate.
Missouri Synod (LCMS): Women are not ordained, but can lead or teach otherwise. Communion is more open, but generally limited to LCMS members.
ELCA: Women can be ordained and communion is open to anyone believing the bread or wine contains the real presence of Jesus,
Lutheran worship is often Liturgical, closely resembling a Catholic Mass. Communion beliefs are about as close to the Catholic teaching as Protestants get. Lutherans teach real presence meaning Jesus is present in the bread and wine compared to the Catholic teaching of transubstantiation which says the bread and wine are also Jesus physically.
In my opinion and experience the LCMS reflects the typical US Catholic congregation socially the most. The ELCA can attract a decent numbers of people raised Catholic but didn’t like the Church structure or wanted a church that was more socially/female liberal.
Care to identify exactly where the ELCA, as a member of the World Lutheran Federation, is “Lutheran in name only”? Where do the Confessions point out the WELC and LCMS, comprising maybe 5 million Lutherans in north America, as the sole heir’s of the Augsburg Confession?Indeed. But the differences of the LCMS and WELS have nothing to do with how we interpret the confessions. We are on the same page in this regard. The confessions don’t address unit or pulpit fellowship so it’s up to the synods to decide which one they want.
The ELCA is Lutheran in name only although there might be a few folks left interested in fidelity to historical confessional Lutheranism.
Thanks, but I was hoping to avoid bickering about who is more Lutheran than others.Indeed. But the differences of the LCMS and WELS have nothing to do with how we interpret the confessions. We are on the same page in this regard. The confessions don’t address unit or pulpit fellowship so it’s up to the synods to decide which one they want.
The ELCA is Lutheran in name only although there might be a few folks left interested in fidelity to historical confessional Lutheranism.
Exactly.Indeed. But the differences of the LCMS and WELS have nothing to do with how we interpret the confessions. We are on the same page in this regard. The confessions don’t address unit or pulpit fellowship so it’s up to the synods to decide which one they want.
The ELCA is Lutheran in name only although there might be a few folks left interested in fidelity to historical confessional Lutheranism.
True, although north American Lutherans didn’t associate “based on doctrine” but rather, practice. The doctrine of the Lutheran Church is summarized in the Augsburg Confession. An example of ‘practice’ could be the number of times the holy Sacrament is celebrated. The WELC probably does not have a Mass each Sunday and holy day as the Confessions claim of Lutherans. A good number of Wisconsin Synod parishes don’t allow other Lutherans to partake of holy Communion; where is that in the Augsburg Confession?The WELS and LCMS churches don’t belong to the World Lutheran Federation. The short of it is that Lutherans came over to this country and originally worshiped together based on their country of origin. This was mainly Germans and Scandinavians. As the language of worship became English, churches started combining based on doctrine. There has never been complete agreement and so never one Lutheran church in this country. For some these disagreements remain heated to this day.
How do you figure? They have a set liturgy and follow the Divine Service just like all Lutherans. Wouldn’t an AoG member be more likely to find any Confessional Lutheran service to be terribly “Catholic”?Since this topic is on the difference between Lutherans and the Church of God, it could be suggested that the Wisconsin Synod worships in a manner more like a typical ‘Protestant’ denomination that Catholic.
To understate, your numbers are grossly inflated. We’ve been over this before. :banghead: Heck, even the Wiki page notes the inflation. I hope you will consider revising your positions.One certainly couldn’t make that claim for Lutherans who are part of the Lutheran World Federation, approximately 90% of all world Lutherans.
Sometimes I get so weary of the synod vs synod warfare I am ready to swim the Tiber. Or the Bosphorus.Can we be Christian to each other first before we try to define what a “real” Lutheran is?
Any WELS or LCMS parish would suffice. I would say once the ELCA started accepting to the ministry folks actively, and proudly practicing “pornea” they ceased to be Lutheran.Care to identify exactly where the ELCA, as a member of the World Lutheran Federation, is “Lutheran in name only”? Where do the Confessions point out the WELC and LCMS, comprising maybe 5 million Lutherans in north America, as the sole heir’s of the Augsburg Confession?
Maybe you could highlight one of your Wisconsin Lutheran parishes to show us what real Lutherans look like?
Just curious, when you were a “real” Catholic and then became a “real” Lutheran, did you exert as much energy figuring out who are not “real” Lutherans?Any WELS or LCMS parish would suffice. I would say once the ELCA started accepting to the ministry folks actively, and proudly practicing “pornea” they ceased to be Lutheran.
I don’t need to exert any energy at all. God says that those actively practicing “pornea” are not worthy to be ministers of the gospel. Your denomination disagrees and celebrates that particular sin. I will simply go with what God says, no effort on my part necessary.Just curious, when you were a “real” Catholic and then became a “real” Lutheran, did you exert as much energy figuring out who are not “real” Lutherans?![]()
Indeed the WELS and the LCMS are in active talks, and I pray they are fruitful. We are on the same page in terms of how we view the confessions and that’s a huge step towards unity. I admit my communion can be a bit insular and clannish, this is to our shame. But I have high hopes for our reunion.Exactly.
Here’s a bit more info about how similar WELS, LCMS and our little sister the ELS truly are. Frankly, it’s a matter of time before the three Confessional synods rekindle full fellowship.
As for the ELCA, I agree entirely. The difference between Lutherans and those that call themselves Lutherans is as simple as quia or quatenus. That is - are the Lutheran Confessions worth following because they are a correct interpretation of Scripture (Sola Scriptura, a practice of the church), or only insofar as they are a correct interpretation of Scripture (Personal Interpretation, and “I” can pick and choose what to believe).
Well, as Catholics, we know and confess that all the Baptized (in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit) are Catholic - fellow citizens with us in the Kingdom established by God and his Christ. It is our rebirth as new creatures, as his People.These 2 I know nothing about. Just wondering what’s different from us.
I think it is safe to say that there is no real comparisons between Lutherans and the Church of God, per Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_GodI quickly tired of all the intra-Lutheran squabbling. (Let the REAL Lutheran stand up).
So I did some research on the Church of God to see if they and the Lutherans were somehow related. They are only connected tangentally in that the COG came from pietism.
Just wondered why the OP connected the two?
I kind of see the Lutherans who proudly call them selves ‘confessional’ as being some how related to the political ‘tea party’. Please hear me out. The political tea party is very, very conservative, so are the ‘confessional’ Lutherans to at least some degree. The PTP has great animus for homosexauals, so do many confessional Lutherans. The PTP sees women to be kept in their place, so do many confessional Lutherans and that place is not in a pulpit or at an Altar.
I could be completely wrong in all of this, as I am not Lutheran and not in on all the debates. When I was checking out Lutherans there was no ELCA, only LCMS, the ALC, and the LCA. If WELS existed at the time I was not aware of them, they did not exist in my city.
First I went to the ALC and then the LCMS. The LCMS was already caught up in the church growth movement and eschwed Liturgical worship. So that ended my relationship with LCMS.