Lutherans and the Deuterocanonical Books

  • Thread starter Thread starter TriuneUnity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Great article!
It is. And it is nice to see the confessional Lutheran community returning to viewing the deuterocanonicals as part of common scriptural heritage. Hopefully we will slowly come to realize that we musn’t adopt Luther’s views for Luther’s sake.

It is interesting to note that the Augsburg Confession refers to the DC as scripture (in quoting Sirach).
 
cyberbrethren.typepad.com/cyberbrethren/2008/07/the-apocrypha-missing-in-action-in-the-lutheran-church.html

A really good article on how Lutherans have viewed the deuterocanonical texts of the Old Testament historically, as well as how every non-Catholic or Orthodox should view them.
Maybe Lutherans should call the “usable” parts of the deutero’s Tradition (you know, with a capital “T”).
We wrestled with the question of whether or not to include the Apocryphal books in The Lutheran Study Bible. For three reasons, we finally decided not to. First, the Apocypha is so little known among Lutherans today that simply to include it in TLSB would have caused a ruckus and consternation among most of our fellow English speaking Lutherans who know nothing at all about the Apocrypha. We felt we would be putting something in front of people who have had little, to no, opportunity to learn and understand what these books are, from their pastors. It woudl cause potentially very serious offense and confusion, at this point in time. Second, there was no published translation of the Apocrypha available in English, in the ESV translation when we had to make a decision about this. Unfortunately, the Oxford edition comes too late for our Bible. Third, there are next to no resource materials available on the Apocryphal books from which we can draw notes and commentary. Simply put, English speaking Lutheran pastors, professors and theologians have not done any work on these books. So, for these three reasons they will not be in TLSB. But perhaps a future edition will be able to include them.
The article is interesting, but I’d find it wishy-washy. It’s like trying to get an Orthodox to define their “first among equals” view of the bishop of Rome.
The Roman Catholic, at the Council of Trent, did something never before done in the history of the church: it put the Apocryphal books on the same level of authority as the rest of the books of the Bible.
The above just plain false. How could an article that required so much research have gotten this simple fact wrong?
 
Don’t the Eastern Orthodox have even more books they include in their bibles?
This may be a dumb question, but I was a bit taken aback by visiting one site that mentioned they had more books.
 
Don’t the Eastern Orthodox have even more books they include in their bibles?
This may be a dumb question, but I was a bit taken aback by visiting one site that mentioned they had more books.
Yep.

Not to worry though. Eastern Catholic Churches have some of the same books.

The Catholic Church has no problem with these other books, but bibles without at least the seven deutero’s are deficient.
 
Maybe Lutherans should call the “usable” parts of the deutero’s Tradition (you know, with a capital “T”).
Good idea. I think it’s somewhat firmer than tradition because we at least have it in written form and can establish it to be of ancient origin. I do not believe we should draw direct doctrine from them…but as a liturgical aid to worship and establishing the silence of the time when no prophets were given to Israel, as a bridge between Malachi and John the Baptist, they’re fantastic.
The article is interesting, but I’d find it wishy-washy. It’s like trying to get an Orthodox to define their “first among equals” view of the bishop of Rome.
As to them leaving the DC out of the forthcoming Lutheran Study Bible, I agree it is wishy-washy. On the plus side, Oxford Publishing will print the English Standard Version with the DC included which will be the first English translation from a Protestant publishing company to do so since the KJV.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top