Did I forget to mention that the Anglican communion can not agree on Consubstantiation.
"Consubstantiation is a theory which (like the competing theory of
transubstantiation, with which it is often contrasted) attempts to describe the nature of the
Christian Eucharist in terms of philosophical metaphysics. It holds that during the
sacrament the
substance (a technical philosophical term which refers to the fundamental reality of a thing) of the body and blood of Christ are present alongside the substance of the bread and wine, which persists. This view is often incorrectly attributed to the
Lutheran church, which, although its writings often refer to the body and blood of Christ as “in, with, and under” the bread and wine, refuses to describe the Eucharist in terms of any philosophical theory.
In
England in the late
14th century, there was a political and religious movement known as
Lollardy. Among much broader goals, the Lollards affirmed a form of consubstantiation – that the Eucharist remained physically bread and wine, while becoming spiritually the body and blood of Christ. Lollardy was effectively ended with the execution of
John Badby for heresy by
burning at the stake.
In literature the conflict between Consubstantiation and
Transubstantiation was satirically described in
Jonathan Swift’s “
Gulliver’s Travels” as war between
Lilliput and Blefuscu."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consubstantiation
