Additionally, no, the word “all” does not always mean “all.” However, in this conversation, there are defenders of Calvin’s position that only the elect are given grace by God, and the reprobate are never given the grace to be saved. So if the word “all” {in Titus 2:11} is only referring to the elect, then it is referring to what is described as the “few who enter the narrow gate.” (
Mt 7:14). That renders this either a highly improbable interpretation of the word “all” or a completely untenable one. The verse would instead read, “for the grace of God has appeared to a few.”
Contrary to this notion of God withholding grace to some of mankind are these examples, some of which I cited earlier to no avail:
Acts 17:30 In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent.
1 Timothy 2:3-4 This is good and pleasing to God our savior, who wills everyone to be saved…
Romans 11:32 For God delivered all to disobedience, that he might have mercy upon all.Everyone has a chance to be saved. Although his exegesis remains absent, our good brother, Reformed, has apparently pitted the analogy of the potter in conflict with these verses and Christ’s mission.
There are at least three reasons why Romans 9 cannot not trump the verses I have cited. The first, is Paul’s musing of the phrases “what if God” made people for good or some for destruction (e.g. v. 22). By this hypothetical language, He simply demonstrates who is in command. The point being no one can supersede His will.
The second is because no two Scriptures cannot conflict. They all must be harmonized.
The third is what I have been articulating for a number of posts now, which is the God’s foreknowledge recognizing in advance from the beginning of time, who would cooperate with His grace and who wouldn’t. Those whom He “foreknew” would cooperate therefore were His “predestined.” (e.g. 1 chapter earlier,
Rm 8:29). And thus, in Romans 9, those whom He foreknew to cooperate correspond to the noble (v. 21) and the those whom He foreknew to not freely cooperate still entered time and served “dishonorable” purposes. The analogy of the clay cannot go so far as to equate man as a completely passive, inanimate blob with no free will. To take the analogy that far would also be to contradict Scripture, especially since Calvinism teaches that those who go to hell go there of their own fault.
No matter how you slice the chapter, it does not refute, but rather is harmonized with, the rest of Scripture, that demonstrates God wills the salvation of all and so provides grace to all.