Main Differences between Eastern and Western Spirituality

  • Thread starter Thread starter PatienceAndLove
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bishop John Ireland, the fater of Orthodoxy in America!
History behind it:

In 1889 Fr. Toth’s bishop sent him to America to minister to Ruthenian Greek Catholics in Minneapolis, MN.

1884 - 1889 = 5 years from first priest to the schism, many priests did not schism.
1890 Letter that permanent priests in the USA must be celibate. *
1902 Apostolic Visitator Canon Hodobay arrives (May 8)

The Ruthenians that immigrated knew that they did not have jurisdiction of their own. **

And they knew in 1890 that they had to avoid scandal of married priests. *

  • According to Sacred Oriental Congregation, Prot. No. 572-30, Rome, July 23, 1934:
    But your Excellency knows well how, under the appearance of vast questions, there lies prevalently that much more restricted question, which has its origin in the regulation of article XII of the Decree Cum Data Fuerit of March 1,1929, and by which was again decreed what had already been prescribed since 1890; that is to say, “that Greek Ruthenian priests who desire to betake themselves to the United States of America and to remain there must be celibates.”
… the Ruthenian population in the United States of America. There it represents an immigrant element and a minority, and it could not, therefore, pretend to maintain there its own customs and traditions which are in contrast with those which are the legitimate customs and traditions of Catholicism in the United States, and much less to have there a clergy which could be a source of painful perplexity or scandal to the majority of American Catholics.

And, moreover, when the Holy See recognized the peculiarities of the Greek Ruthenian Church and guaranteed them, it intended principally - as is evident from the Decree of Union of 1596, during the Pontificate of Clement VII, and of the Brief of Paul V of 1615 - to recognize and guarantee the ritual traditions of the Ruthenians.

As regards their particular canonical discipline, the Holy See could not have affirmed its integral application at all times and in all places without taking into account the different exigencies and circumstances. Thus one can well understand how a married clergy, permitted in those places where the Greek Ruthenian Rite originated and constitutes a predominant element, could hardly be advisable in places where the same Rite has been imported and finds an environment and mentality altogether different.

You can read that here: stlouis.byzcath.org/links.htm
** From the first Catholic bishop in the United States in 1789 until 1908, all the Catholic Churches there fell under the jurisdiction of the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith as missionary territory. Then from 1908 to 1917, only the Eastern Catholic Churches remained under the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith, until the Congregation for the Oriental Churches was established in 1917.
 
https://i.imgsafe.org/fbc898d.jpg

I don’t support Latinization by any means.
But one can’t deny the beauty of this. The Mass of All Time surrounded by the beauty of Eastern iconography and architecture. I love our Church. :crossrc::byzsoc:
Can’t deny? As a priest who has been a professor of liturgy, I have no hesitancy to say this image leaves me quite cold – and that for a variety of reasons looking to the past, the present, and the future.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top