Major Arch Bishop /Catholicose

  • Thread starter Thread starter ninan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

ninan

Guest
The head of Syro Malankara Catholic church (sui juris) holds the title Major Arch Bishop Catholicose which is almost equivalent to that of a Patriarch.
The present Head is His Beatitude Moran Mor Baselios Clemis,
Major Arch Bishop- Catholicos.

malankaracatholicchurch.net
 
The head of Syro Malankara Catholic church (sui juris) holds the title Major Arch Bishop Catholicose which is almost equivalent to that of a Patriarch.
The present Head is His Beatitude Moran Mor Baselios Clemis,
Major Arch Bishop- Catholicos.

malankaracatholicchurch.net
Do some of the Easter Catholic Churches refer to the heads of their Churches as “Major Archbishops” because they believe the true line of Patriarchs to still be outside of the Church? If this isn’t the reason, what is?
 
Do some of the Easter Catholic Churches refer to the heads of their Churches as “Major Archbishops” because they believe the true line of Patriarchs to still be outside of the Church? If this isn’t the reason, what is?
I think Patriarch is a title specific to Rome, Constantinople, Antioch, Alexandria, and Jerusalem, is it not? (Although Rome has set it aside, and there are a few Patriarchs of particular places in the West…)
 
Of the 22 Eastern Catholic Churches *sui juris *, 6 are Patriarchal (Melkites, Maronites, Chaldean, Syrians, Armenians, and Copts) and 4 are Major Archbishoprics. The remaining 12 are from Metropolitanates down.

The 4 MAs are the UGCC, the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church, the Romanian Byzantine Catholic Church, and the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church, the subject of the OP.

In the Catholic communion of churches and in the CCEO, the chief hierarch of each of the 4 Major Archbishoprics is officially known and titled “Major Archbishop,” although it is recognized that Major Archbishops function akin to Patriarchs.

However, the faithful of the UGCC feel that they should have the dignity of a Patriarchal Church, being the largest of the Eastern Cathoic Churches with about 6 million adherents. The Holy Synod of the UGCC thus declared their Church to be patriarchal and endowed their chief hierarch, Major Archbishop Lubomyr Husar (also a Cardinal), the title of Patriarch and submitted their decision to Rome requesting approval. The late Pope John Paul II did not act on their request and it remains unacted by Pope Benedict XVI.

Internally, Cardinal Husar is referred to as Patriarch by both the faithful and clergy. Officially and in communications with Rome, however, Cardinal Husar does not use the title “Patriarch.”

This state of affairs in the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church, with about 400,000 faithful, mimics that in the UGCC. Rome has not approved the use of the title “Catholicos” by the Major Archbishop of the Syro-Malankaras, although internally he is regarded as their “Catholicos.”
 
Dear Brother Xavier,
Do some of the Easter Catholic Churches refer to the heads of their Churches as “Major Archbishops” because they believe the true line of Patriarchs to still be outside of the Church? If this isn’t the reason, what is?
My impression is that the Catholic Church is not inclined to make any new Patriarchates apart from the Traditional ones that already existed from the early Middle Ages. A special case exists for the Antiochene Patriarchate, where there are three distinct Traditions (Maronite, Syriac, and Melkite).

Blessings,
Marduk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top