No. All we have is now and the present moment. The real line extends without bound into the past and future and yet there is a point on the line corresponding to 2016, the present year.
The resolution of Zeno’s paradox shows that this is not true.
Wrong.
The statement was that it is not possible to reach the end of an infinite series. There is no proof that time is not continuous, and it is assumed to be continuous even in quantum mechanics. Lattice gauge theory does assume discreteness, but it fails because it is not Lorentz invariant. People want the universe to act like a binary digital computer so that everything can be calculated nicely by the computer.
Please tell us how you expect to preserve Lorentz invariance and even translational invariance in a discrete formulation of physics in Minkowski space time (Do not assume Euclidean space time as I agree it might be possible there if you throw in a lot of other assumptions to begin with.)
I can’t, because I don’t know what most of that means.
Actually, if you are slicing that infinitely divisible hamburger and eating the pieces, you would have a problem there. You would have to assume that the whole thing goes into your mouth before it divides.
