H
HenryV
Guest
Do you think Traditional Catholicism is more appealing to men than the modern variety?
Yes, without question.Do you think Traditional Catholicism is more appealing to men than the modern variety?
I meant the struggle for holiness, the courage to proclaim the truth. The sacrifice to follow in the footsteps of Christ. The adventure of the Saints.I think that in this fast-paced world it offers a view of Catholicism that has not changed according to the words and standards of today. I say view quite deliberately, because I mean that just as a diamond can seem different from different angles, so the different traditions within Catholicism can seem different, but are ultimately all expressions of the same fundamental Truths.
Specifically, for me the version of ascetic spirituality it promotes can be sufficiently contrasted against the world–whereas many modern expressions of Catholicism seem to be quite similar to worldly things.
Again I’d like to emphasise this is not a criticism of modern things, just a comment on personal preferences. Whilst I want my spiritual life to be ‘of the world’ and in the world, I find a comfort and solace in being able to clearly label spiritual things as such.
Hope that ramble made sense!![]()
I think that it goes to how one is called, and I have no knock against either. And of course part of the problem is that the question is loaded to begin with, as it goes to how one defines “holy”. One might find holy in the “as you treated the least of my brothers” while another might find holy in the purely contemplative. For the bulk of us it is some combination of contemplation and action, combined with appropriate piety (another loaded term).I meant the struggle for holiness, the courage to proclaim the truth. The sacrifice to follow in the footsteps of Christ. The adventure of the Saints.
Isn’t it more emphasized in traditional spirituality than in modern Catholic pastorally sensitive ways?