D
Deacon_Ed_B
Guest
Try contemplating "The Mystical Body. "
From the Office of the Readings today, St. Augustine wrote.
“God became man, so that man might become God.”
…
…
St. Therese’s analogy of being a drop of water in the ocean
…
On this subject, check out the book “The Cloud of Unknowing”.…
St. John of the Cross teaches that through perfection in love we “become God by participation.”
…
Same words, different meanings. To Hindus that means losing your identity, your personhood, into the divine, whereas to us Christians we never cease to be individuals even in union with God.There’s also much in Indian spirituality on this subject (adwaita vedanta, and various yogic paths treat this extensively). The “drop of water in the ocean” analogy predates Christianity in Indian spirituality. But I wouldn’t expect loyal Catholics to venture into those areas.

My understanding of Hinduism is that a person definitely does not cease to be an individual even in union with God.Same words, different meanings. To Hindus that means losing your identity, your personhood, into the divine, whereas to us Christians we never cease to be individuals even in union with God.
![]()
My understanding of Hinduism, is similar to what you’re saying here.My understanding of Hinduism is that a person definitely does not cease to be an individual even in union with God.
There are plenty of examples of Hindu teachers claiming full union with God while physically living in a human body and expressing themselves with individual identity. (Just like any other religion there is also no shortage of con artist impostors).
They do refer to states of concsiousness called Nirvikalpa Samadhi and Sahaja Samadhi. Nirvikalpa refers to without form. This could be interpreted as no more individual or simply no more material form.
Since Hinduism is not a centrally directed religion like Catholicism, there really is no set of dogmatic definitions covering everything. (At least not universally accepted across all possible sub groups).
One convert out of millions and millions doesn’t constitute proof any more than my leaving the religion of my birth (Catholicism) to find that the spirituality of India is far beyond Catholicism is proof of anything other than that’s the appropriate spiritual path for me.My understanding of Hinduism, is similar to what you’re saying here.
The main difference of course is we have God revealed to us in Jesus Christ.
Ravi Zacharias has a wonderful book out called, “Jesus Among Other Gods.”
Having been raised in India in a Hindu Family, he eventually converted to Christianity, and made a career of studying religion.
He teaches comparative religion at a university, but which one doesn’t come to mind at the moment.
Anyway, in the book, he gives a good account of Hindu, Buddhism Muslim beliefs, and compares the founders of these religions, to that of Jesus.
The bottom line, there is no comparison. While all these founders had to find the paths and ways they followed, Jesus did not. Jesus without question told us that He is the way, He is the truth and He is the light and that no one goes to the father, except through Him.
Now, to me that does not mean that Hindus, Muslims and Buddhist, won’t make it to heaven, but rather, the fact that they do, is because of Jesus Christ.
Jim
Its not an attempt to prove anything, only to show the supporting evidence, of who Jesus is and this is the faith that we Catholics have.One convert out of millions and millions doesn’t constitute proof any more than my leaving the religion of my birth (Catholicism) to find that the spirituality of India is far beyond Catholicism is proof of anything other than that’s the appropriate spiritual path for me.
I’ve always thought that it was St. Athanasius who said “God became man, so that man might become God”, not St. Augustine!From the Office of the Readings today, St. Augustine wrote.
“God became man, so that man might become God.”
I haven’t digested the meaning of this, has anyone else?
Jim
Maybe it was both, being its Catholic teaching, but I read it from St. Augustine. in the Office of the Readings from the Liturgy of the Hours for that day.I’ve always thought that it was St. Athanasius who said “God became man, so that man might become God”, not St. Augustine!![]()
The Catechism of the Catholic ChurchFrom the Office of the Readings today, St. Augustine wrote.
“God became man, so that man might become God.”
I haven’t digested the meaning of this, has anyone else?
Jim
